医学
前列腺癌
活检
前列腺活检
随机对照试验
前列腺
泌尿科
生物标志物
临床试验
前瞻性队列研究
内科学
妇科
癌症
生物化学
化学
作者
Ronald Tutrone,Michael Donovan,Phillipp Torkler,Vasisht Tadigotla,Tom McLain,Mikkel Noerholm,Johan Skog,James M. McKiernan
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41391-020-0237-z
摘要
Abstract Background The ExoDx Prostate( IntelliScore ) (EPI) test is a non-invasive risk assessment tool for detection of high-grade prostate cancer (HGPC) that informs whether to proceed with prostate biopsy. We sought to assess the impact of EPI on the decision to biopsy in a real-world clinical setting. Methods We conducted a prospective, randomized, blinded, two-armed clinical utility study that enrolled 1094 patients with 72 urologists from 24 urology practices. Patients were considered for prostate biopsy at enrollment based on standard clinical criteria. All patients had an EPI test; however, patients were randomized into EPI vs. control arms where only the EPI arm received results for their biopsy decision. Results In the EPI arm ( N = 458), 93 patients received negative EPI scores of which 63% were recommended to defer biopsy by the urologist and 74% ultimately deferred. In contrast, 87% of patients with positive EPI scores were recommended to undergo biopsy with a 72% compliance rate to the urologist’s recommendation. This led to detection of 30% more HGPC compared to the control arm, and we estimate that 49% fewer HGPC were missed due to deferrals compared to standard of care (SOC). Overall, 68% of urologists reported that the EPI test influenced their biopsy decision. The primary reason not to comply with EPI results was rising PSA. Conclusion To our knowledge this is the first report on a PC biomarker utility study with a blinded control arm. The study demonstrates that the EPI test influences the overall decision to defer or proceed with a biopsy and improves patient stratification.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI