摘要
The article deals with the data of clinical examination of 127 females with neoplasia of the mammary gland (MG) and the results of cytological examination of tumors at the preoperative stage and their pathologist verification after mastectomy. In the primary examination of animals, clinical signs characteristic of breast tumors are found in 102 (80.3%) dogs. According to the criteria of the international clinical TNM classification, in 44 (43.14%) females, I stage of development of the tumor process was established, in 25 (24,51%) - II, in 29 (28,43%) - ??? and 4 (3,92 %) - IV stage of tumors. In 25 (19.7%) of 127 dogs, the signs of neoplasia were fuzzy since symptoms of fibrocystic disease were at the forefront. According to the results of the histological searches, 88 or 69.3% of the animals were diagnosed with neoplasia of malignant nature, 14 or 11.02% were benign tumors, and in 25 or 19.7% of cases, dysplasia was diagnosed. It was also established that 74 (84.1%) episodes of MG tumors were epithelial, and 28 (15.9%) of other origins. Among malignant neoplasms, the most commonly reported were simple carcinoma, which were 27 (21.26%), complex carcinoma - 26 (20.47%), non-infiltrative carcinoma in situ 18 (14,17%), and rarely was found carcinomas of particular types, namely 3 (2.36%), sarcoma - 10 (7.87%), carcinosarcoma - 4 (3.15%). Benign tumors are represented by fibroadenoma (7.87%) and simple adenoma (3.15%). For localization of the primary lesion, in 53 (60.2%) of the studied tumors, duct cancer was recorded; in 21 (23.9%) cases, the primary cells were detected in the lobes and, respectively, 14 (15.9%) lesions captured both the lobules and the ducts. The results of retrospective searches of dogs diagnosed with fibro-cystic disease have shown that in over 40% of these animals, the proliferative form of mastopathy has been verified, as well as signs of its transformation and microfocus tumor growth, which may indicate the direct involvement of this disease in carcinogenesis. According to the results of a comparative analysis of clinical stages and histological types of spontaneous breast tumors in females, it has been found that the magnitude of the tumor and the degree of its malignancy are interrelated, as a tendency is observed, in which, along with the growth of the T index, which according to the clinical TNM classification of the tumor reflects its size, the number of cases of neoplastic neoplasms that are malignant is increasing.
Keywords: dogs, neoplasia of the mammary gland, TNM classification of tumors, cytological and histological research methods.
References
Alleman, A.R., & Bain, P.J. (2002). Rozpoznawanie nowotworow: cytologiczna ocena zlo?liwo?ci. Weterynarya po Dyplomie, 3, 50.
Badowska-Kozakiewicz, A.M., & Milacka, E. (2011). Najcz??ciej rozpoznawane nowotwory pochodzenia nab?onkowego w ro?nicowej diagnostyce histopatologicznej guzow gruczo?u sutkowego u suk. ?ycie Weterynaryjne, 86(7), 531 536.
Chang, S.-C. Chang, C.-C., Chang, T.-J., & Wong, M.-L. (2005). Prognostic factors associated with survival two years after surgery in dogs with malignant mammary tumors: 79 cases (1998–2002). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 227(10), 1625 1629. doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.227.1625.
Gama, A., Alves, A., & Schmitt, F. (2008). Identification of molecular phenotypes in canine mammary carcinomas with clinical implications: application of the human classification. Virchows Arch, 453(2), 123–132. doi: 10.1007/s00428-008-0644-3.
Goldschmidt, ?., Pena, L., Rasotto, R., & Zappulli, V. (2011). Classification and Grading of Canine Mammary Tumors. Veterinary Pathology, 48(1), 117-131. doi: 10.1177/0300985810393258.
Gutyj, B., Grymak, Y., Hunchak, V., Mysak, A., Nazaruk, N., Brezvyn, O., Hariv, I., Shcherbatyy, A., Semeniv, B., Bushueva, I., Parchenko, V., Kaplaushenko, A. (2018). Preclinical searches of the preparation Thireomagnile. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 8(1), 688–695. doi: 10.15421/2018_267
Hildebrand, W. (2007). Przydatno?? biopsji aspiracyjnej cinkoiglowej w diagnostyce onkologicznej. Magazyn weterynaryjny, 16(124), 16–18.
Karpetskaya, N. (2007). Pathomorphological features of tumors and tumor-like diseases of mammary glands in dogs. Veterinary Doctor, 7-8, 23.
Mac Ewen, E., & Withrow, S. (1996). Tumors of the mammary gland. Small animal clinical oncology, 356?372.
Matos, A.J., Baptista, C.S., Gartner, M.F., & Rutteman, G.R. (2012). Prognostic studies of canine and feline mammary tumours: the need for standardized procedures. Vet. Journal., 193(3), 24?31. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.12.019.
Misdorp, W., & Meuten, D. (2002). Tumors of the mammary gland. Tumors of domestic animals, 575–606.
Misdorp, W., Else, R., Hellmen, E., & Lipscomb, T. (1999). Histological classification of mammary tumors of the dog and cat (2nd series). Armed Forces Inst. Pathol. in cooperation with Amer. Registry of Pathol. and World Health Organization Collaborating Center for World Reference on Compar. Oncol. Washington DC.
Morris, J., & Dobson, J. (2003). Onkologia mallych zwierz?t. Sima WLW: Warszawa.
Mouser, P., Miller M.?., Antuofermo, E., & Badve, S.S. (2010). Prevalence and classification of spontaneous mammary intraepithelial lesions in dogs without clinical mammary disease. Vet. Pathology, 47(2), 275?284. doi: 10.1177/0300985809358603.
Murphy, S. (2008). Mammary tumors in dogs and cat. In Practice, 30(6), 334–339.
Mysak, A., Kie?bowicz, Z., Khomyn, N., Pritsak, V., & Gutyj, B. (2018). Graphically x-ray and ultrasound diagnostics for monitoring neoplasia of the mammary gland in bitches. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 8(1), 386–393. doi: 10.15421/2018_226
Novosad, C.A. (2003). Principles of treatment for mammary gland tumors. Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice, 18(2), 107-109. doi: 10.1053/svms.2003.36625.
Owen, L.N. (1980). TNM Classification of Tumors in Domestic Animals. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Potockyj, M., & Shestyaeva, N. (2004). Fibrosis-cystic disease of the mammary gland of dogs. Scientific Bulletin of the Lviv National Academy of Veterinary Medicine. S. Z. Gzhytskyj, 6(3), 79-85.
Rivera, P., & von Euler, H. (2011). Molecular biological aspects on canine and human mammary tumours. Veterinary Pathology, 48(1), 132–146. doi: 10.1177/0300985810387939.
Santos, A.A., Lopes, C.C., Ribeiro, J.R., Martins, L.R., Santos, J.C., Amorim, I.F., Gartner, F., & Matos, A.J. (2013). Identification of prognostic factors in canine mammary malignant tumours: a multivariable survival study. Vet. Res., 9, 1 11.
Sassi, F., Benazzi, C., Castellani, G., & Sarli, G. (2010). Molecular-based tumour subtypes of canine mammary carcinomas assessed by immunohistochemistry. BMC Vet Res, 28(6), 5. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-6-5.
Shestyajeva, N. (2011). The significance of dysplasia in the occurrence of malignant tumors of the mammary glands of dogs. Scientific Bulletin of the Dnepropetrovsk State Agrarian University, 2, 92-93.
Sontas, ?.?., Ozyogurtcub, H., Gurel, A., & Ekici, H. (2009). Evaluation of clinical and pathological characteristics of 155 canines with mammary tumors: a retrospective study. Arch Med Vet., 41, 53–59. doi: 10.4067/S0301-732X2009000100007.
Sorenmo, K.U., Kristiansen, V.M., Cofone, M.A., Shofer, F.S. et al. (2009). Canine mammary gland tumours; a histological continuum from benign to malignant; clinical and histopathological evidence. Vet. and Comp. Oncology., 7(3), 162?172. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5829.2009.00184.x.
Sorenmo, K.U., Rasotto, R., Zappulli, V., & Goldschmidt, M.H. (2011). Development, anatomy, histology, lymphatic drainage, clinical features, and cell differentiation markers of canine mammary gland neoplasms. Vet Pathol, 48(1), 85–97. doi: 10.1177/0300985810389480.
Webster, J. D., Dennis, M.M., & Dervisis, N. (2011). Recommended Guidelines for the Conduct and Evaluation of Prognostic Studies in Veterinary Oncology. Veterinary Pathology, 48(1), 7?18. doi: 10.1177/0300985810377187.
Yamagami, T., Kobayashi, T., Takahashi, K., & Sugiyama, M. (1996). Prognosis for canine malignant mammary tumors based on TNM and histological classifications. J. Vet. med. Sci., 58(11), 1079?1083. doi: 10.1292/jvms.58.11_1079.