GRADE concept paper 2: Concepts for judging certainty on the calibration of prognostic models in a body of validation studies

确定性 推论 校准 计量经济学 计算机科学 医学 统计 人工智能 数学 几何学
作者
Farid Foroutan,Gordon Guyatt,Marialena Trivella,Nina Kreuzberger,Nicole Skoetz,Richard D. Riley,Pavel S Roshanov,Ana Carolina Alba,Nigar Sekercioglu,Carlos Canelo‐Aybar,Zachary Munn,Romina Brignardello‐Petersen,Holger J. Schünemann,Alfonso Iorio
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:143: 202-211 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.024
摘要

Abstract

Background: Prognostic models combine several prognostic factors to provide an estimate of the likelihood (or risk) of future events in individual patients, conditional on their prognostic factor values. A fundamental part of evaluating prognostic models is undertaking studies to determine whether their predictive performance, such as calibration and discrimination, is reproduced across settings. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies evaluating prognostic models' performance are a necessary step for selection of models for clinical practice and for testing the underlying assumption that their use will improve outcomes, including patient's reassurance and optimal future planning. Methods: In this paper, we highlight key concepts in evaluating the certainty of evidence regarding the calibration of prognostic models. Results and Conclusion: Four concepts are key to evaluating the certainty of evidence on prognostic models' performance regarding calibration. The first concept is that the inference regarding calibration may take one of two forms: deciding whether one is rating certainty that a model's performance is satisfactory or, instead, unsatisfactory, in either case defining the threshold for satisfactory (or unsatisfactory) model performance. Second, inconsistency is the critical GRADE domain to deciding whether we are rating certainty in the model performance being satisfactory or unsatisfactory. Third, depending on whether one is rating certainty in satisfactory or unsatisfactory performance, different patterns of inconsistency of results across studies will inform ratings of certainty of evidence. Fourth, exploring the distribution of point estimates of observed to expected ratio across individual studies, and its determinants, will bear on the need for and direction of future research.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
weiwei完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
科研通AI2S应助姜凯采纳,获得10
1秒前
孙福禄应助西西采纳,获得10
2秒前
孙福禄应助西西采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
单纯青槐发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
luckbaby完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
方赫然发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
JerryZ发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
今后应助高贵绿真采纳,获得10
3秒前
Ava应助mariawang采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
菜不透发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
纸猫发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
weiwei发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
poli发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
诚心尔琴发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
fgh完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
CipherSage应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
CAOHOU应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
NexusExplorer应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
SYLH应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
Akim应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
SYLH应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
CodeCraft应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
乐乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
爱听歌芝麻完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
峥2发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
上官若男应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
musejie应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
李爱国应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 350
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3988786
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3531116
关于积分的说明 11252493
捐赠科研通 3269766
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1804771
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 881870
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 809021