善良
订单(交换)
动作(物理)
考试(生物学)
不公平厌恶
心理学
零(语言学)
社会心理学
序列(生物学)
风险厌恶(心理学)
经济
数理经济学
数学
期望效用假设
政治学
法学
古生物学
数学分析
语言学
哲学
物理
遗传学
财务
量子力学
不平等
生物
作者
Charles Bellemare,Alexander Sebald,Sigrid Suetens
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.geb.2016.11.002
摘要
We compare three approaches to test for guilt aversion in two economic experiments. The first approach elicits second-order beliefs using self-reports. The second approach discloses first-order beliefs of matched players to decision makers, which are taken as exogenous second-order beliefs of decision makers. The third approach lets decision makers make choices conditional on a sequence of possible first-order beliefs of matched players. We find that the first and third approach generate similar results, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The second approach, however, generates significantly higher levels of 'kindness' for low levels of beliefs: at a second-order belief of zero, the probability of choosing the 'kind' action is between 43 and 65 percentage points higher than with the other approaches.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI