心理学
差异(会计)
社会心理学
价值论
道德解脱
心理信息
道德推理
价值(数学)
竞赛(生物学)
道德心理学
认知心理学
认识论
经济
计算机科学
生物
生态学
机器学习
会计
哲学
政治学
法学
梅德林
作者
Dale J. Cohen,Minwoo Ahn
摘要
Current theories hypothesize that moral judgments are difficult because rational and emotional decision processes compete. We present a fundamentally different theory of moral judgment: the Subjective Utilitarian Theory of moral judgment. The Subjective Utilitarian Theory posits that people try to identify and save the competing item with the greatest "personal value." Moral judgments become difficult only when the competing items have similar personal values. In Experiment 1, we estimate the personal values of 104 items. In Experiments 2-5, we show that the distributional overlaps of the estimated personal values account for over 90% of the variance in reaction times (RTs) and response choices in a moral judgment task. Our model fundamentally restructures our understanding of moral judgments from a competition between decision processes to a competition between similarly valued items. (PsycINFO Database Record
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI