Development and Validation of Two Instruments Measuring Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load

认知负荷 可比性 心理学 认知 认知心理学 任务(项目管理) 数学 组合数学 经济 神经科学 管理
作者
Melina Klepsch,Florian Schmitz,Tina Seufert
出处
期刊:Frontiers in Psychology [Frontiers Media]
卷期号:8 被引量:342
标识
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01997
摘要

Cognitive Load Theory is one of the most powerful research frameworks in educational research. Beside theoretical discussions about the conceptual parts of cognitive load, the main challenge within this framework is that there is still no measurement instrument for the different aspects of cognitive load, namely intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Hence, the goal of this paper is to develop a differentiated measurement of cognitive load. In Study 1 (N = 97), we developed and analyzed two strategies to measure cognitive load in a differentiated way: (1) Informed rating: We trained learners in differentiating the concepts of cognitive load, so that they could rate them in an informed way. They were asked then to rate 24 different learning situations or learning materials related to either high or low intrinsic, extraneous, or germane load. (2) Naïve rating: For this type of rating of cognitive load we developed a questionnaire with two to three items for each type of load. With this questionnaire, the same learning situations had to be rated. In the second study (N = between 65 and 95 for each task), we improved the instrument for the naïve rating. For each study, we analyzed whether the instruments are reliable and valid, for Study 1, we also checked for comparability of the two measurement strategies. In Study 2, we conducted a simultaneous scenario based factor analysis. The informed rating seems to be a promising strategy to assess the different aspects of cognitive load, but it seems not economic and feasible for larger studies and a standardized training would be necessary. The improved version of the naïve rating turned out to be a useful, feasible, and reliable instrument. Ongoing studies analyze the conceptual validity of this measurement with up to now promising results.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
vxi完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
Akim应助脑残骑士老张采纳,获得10
4秒前
马康辉关注了科研通微信公众号
6秒前
8秒前
混子发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
笑一笑发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
共享精神应助长言采纳,获得10
10秒前
乐观小之应助xuan采纳,获得10
11秒前
Jinna706完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
澄碧星林完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
闪闪的完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
听风完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
zhu完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
Rein完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
有魅力的凡灵完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
orixero应助LUK_采纳,获得10
19秒前
科目三应助孤独的珩采纳,获得10
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
23秒前
无忧无虑完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
预现ls发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
25秒前
呆萌冷风发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
27秒前
28秒前
28秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助30
29秒前
躺在云上看星星完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
长言发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
liu发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
孤独的珩发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
影子完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
yilin完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
高大的水米给高大的水米的求助进行了留言
36秒前
高分求助中
The Mother of All Tableaux Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 2400
Ophthalmic Equipment Market by Devices(surgical: vitreorentinal,IOLs,OVDs,contact lens,RGP lens,backflush,diagnostic&monitoring:OCT,actorefractor,keratometer,tonometer,ophthalmoscpe,OVD), End User,Buying Criteria-Global Forecast to2029 2000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind (Sixth Edition) 1000
Optimal Transport: A Comprehensive Introduction to Modeling, Analysis, Simulation, Applications 800
Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL 600
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 588
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3958225
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3504388
关于积分的说明 11118283
捐赠科研通 3235682
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1788411
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 871211
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 802565