Development and Validation of Two Instruments Measuring Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load

认知负荷 可比性 心理学 认知 认知心理学 任务(项目管理) 数学 组合数学 经济 神经科学 管理
作者
Melina Klepsch,Florian Schmitz,Tina Seufert
出处
期刊:Frontiers in Psychology [Frontiers Media]
卷期号:8 被引量:342
标识
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01997
摘要

Cognitive Load Theory is one of the most powerful research frameworks in educational research. Beside theoretical discussions about the conceptual parts of cognitive load, the main challenge within this framework is that there is still no measurement instrument for the different aspects of cognitive load, namely intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Hence, the goal of this paper is to develop a differentiated measurement of cognitive load. In Study 1 (N = 97), we developed and analyzed two strategies to measure cognitive load in a differentiated way: (1) Informed rating: We trained learners in differentiating the concepts of cognitive load, so that they could rate them in an informed way. They were asked then to rate 24 different learning situations or learning materials related to either high or low intrinsic, extraneous, or germane load. (2) Naïve rating: For this type of rating of cognitive load we developed a questionnaire with two to three items for each type of load. With this questionnaire, the same learning situations had to be rated. In the second study (N = between 65 and 95 for each task), we improved the instrument for the naïve rating. For each study, we analyzed whether the instruments are reliable and valid, for Study 1, we also checked for comparability of the two measurement strategies. In Study 2, we conducted a simultaneous scenario based factor analysis. The informed rating seems to be a promising strategy to assess the different aspects of cognitive load, but it seems not economic and feasible for larger studies and a standardized training would be necessary. The improved version of the naïve rating turned out to be a useful, feasible, and reliable instrument. Ongoing studies analyze the conceptual validity of this measurement with up to now promising results.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
章鱼虾发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
zhaoyuyuan发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
5秒前
kingwill发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
998877剑指发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
十一发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
小李博士发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
领导范儿应助博修采纳,获得10
15秒前
998877剑指完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
美丽的访曼关注了科研通微信公众号
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
Aurora发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
Sean完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
欣欣发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
虚度30年发布了新的文献求助30
25秒前
MMY发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
guyu完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
在水一方应助圆圈采纳,获得10
28秒前
28秒前
搜集达人应助小李博士采纳,获得10
30秒前
30秒前
30秒前
章鱼虾完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
汉堡包应助杨洋采纳,获得10
33秒前
墩墩应助高高采纳,获得10
34秒前
鸿十三陵发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
34秒前
35秒前
洁净的幼珊完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
36秒前
stt完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
wykang完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
40秒前
mmb发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
博修发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
大马哥完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
高分求助中
Ophthalmic Equipment Market by Devices(surgical: vitreorentinal,IOLs,OVDs,contact lens,RGP lens,backflush,diagnostic&monitoring:OCT,actorefractor,keratometer,tonometer,ophthalmoscpe,OVD), End User,Buying Criteria-Global Forecast to2029 2000
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
Technical Brochure TB 814: LPIT applications in HV gas insulated switchgear 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3962850
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3508775
关于积分的说明 11142938
捐赠科研通 3241643
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1791625
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 872998
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 803571