Should rituximab replace splenectomy in the management of splenic marginal zone lymphoma?

SMZL is a relatively rare low grade B-cell lymphoma, characterized usually by an indolent clinical behavior. Since there is no prospective randomized trials to establish the best treatment approach, decision on therapeutic management should be based on the available retrospective series. Based on these data, rituximab and splenectomy appear to be the most effective. Splenectomy represented the standard treatment modality until early 2000s. More than 90% of the patients present quick amelioration of splenomegaly related symptoms along with improvement of cytopenias related to hypersplenism. The median progression free survival was 8.25 years in the largest series of patients published so far, while the median 5- and 10- year OS were 84% and 67%, respectively. Responses to splenectomy are not complete since extrasplenic disease persists. Patients with heavy bone marrow infiltration, lymphadenopathy or other disease localization besides the spleen are not good candidates for splenectomy. Furthermore splenectomy is a major surgical procedure accompanied by acute perioperative complications as well as late toxicities mainly due to infections. For that reasons splenectomy is not appropriate for elderly patients or patients with comorbidities with a high surgical risk. On the other hand rituximab monotherapy displays high efficacy with minimal toxicity. Several published series have shown an ORR more than 90%, with high CR rates (∼50%). The 10-year PFS and OS were 63% and 85%, respectively in a series of 104 SMZL patients. The role of rituximab maintenance has been investigated by only one group. Based on these data, maintenance with rituximab further improved the quality of responses by increasing significantly the CR rates (from 42% at the end of induction to 71% at the end of maintenance treatment), as well as the duration of responses: 7-year PFS was 75% for those patients who received maintenance vs 39% for those who did not (p < 0.0004). However no difference in OS has been noticed between the two groups, so far. Summarizing the above data, it is obvious that Rituximab monotherapy is associated with high response rates, long response duration and favorable safety profile, rendering it as the treatment of choice in SMZL.