聚乙二醇非格司亭
医学
肿瘤科
乳腺癌
毒性
内科学
佐剂
化疗
髓样
菲格拉斯汀
辅助化疗
癌症
中性粒细胞减少症
作者
Antonio C. Wolff,Richard J. Jones,Nancy E. Davidson,Stacie C. Jeter,Vered Stearns
标识
DOI:10.1200/jco.2006.05.7174
摘要
In the discussion of the article by Hutchins et al 1 it is stated that both the hazard ratios for disease-free survival and overall survival show a narrow advantage for cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil that was not as strong as had been hypothesized.Furthermore, it was stated that the two-sided statistical test was not statistically significant.Later in the discussion, it is stated that the benefit seen in hormone receptor-positive patients was dramatic.It is clear that the disease-free survival is 6% different in favor of tamoxifen in the hormone receptor-positive patients, but this difference appears to be largely due to a reduction in opposite breast recurrences.Moreover, the difference in overall survival is exactly the same as the difference between cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil, which is 82% with no tamoxifen versus 85% with tamoxifen.There was a one-sided P test, which was significant, but there is no discussion of the two-sided P test.In fact, it appears that if you treat hormonepositive, node-negative breast cancer with chemotherapy the effect of tamoxifen on survival is minimal.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI