生物利用度
鼻腔给药
安定
药代动力学
癫痫
医学
麻醉
药理学
遗产管理(遗嘱认证法)
精神科
政治学
法学
作者
Suresh Agarwal,Robert L. Kriel,Richard C. Brundage,Vijay Ivaturi,James C. Cloyd
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2013.02.018
摘要
Diazepam rectal gel (Diastat®) is the only FDA-approved product indicated for acute repetitive seizures. Despite its proven efficacy, most older children and adults object to this route of administration. As a result, many patients do not realize the benefit of a therapy that can improve outcomes and decrease healthcare costs. Intranasal administration of benzodiazepines offers a potential alternative. The primary objective of this study was to compare the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of two novel intranasal (IN) diazepam (DZP) formulations versus intravenous (IV) administration in healthy volunteers. Twenty-four healthy volunteers were randomized into an open-label, three-way crossover study. 10 mg doses of two investigational intranasal DZP formulations (solution, suspension) and a 5 mg IV dose of commercially available DZP injectable, USP were given. A two-week washout period separated treatments. Plasma samples for DZP analysis were collected pre-dose and at regular intervals up to 240 h post-dose. DZP concentration–time data were analyzed using a non-compartmental pharmacokinetics approach. Exposure following administration of DZP IN solution (absolute bioavailability – 97%) was greater than the IN suspension (absolute bioavailability – 67%). Mean Cmaxvalues for the suspension and solution formulations were 221 ng/mL and 272 ng/mL, respectively. Median time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was 1 h and 1.5 h for suspension and solution formulation, respectively. Both investigational intranasal formulations were well tolerated. The results of this pilot study indicate that development of an intranasal diazepam formulation with high bioavailability, reasonable variability, and good tolerability is feasible.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI