医学
依托泊苷
顺铂
紫杉醇
卡铂
放射治疗
内科学
肺癌
阶段(地层学)
肿瘤科
化疗
生物
古生物学
作者
Lühua Wang,Shixiu Wu,Guangfei Ou,Nan Bi,Wenfeng Li,Hua Ren,Jianzhong Cao,Jun Liang,Junling Li,Zongmei Zhou,Jima Lv,Xiangru Zhang
出处
期刊:Lung Cancer
[Elsevier]
日期:2012-03-13
卷期号:77 (1): 89-96
被引量:75
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.02.011
摘要
To evaluate the activity and safety of concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) plus weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC) regimen compared with widely used cisplatin/etoposide (PE) regimen in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients were randomly assigned to receive the following treatments: PE arm, cisplatin (50mg/m(2)) on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 and etoposide (50 mg/m(2)) on days 1-5 and 29-33 plus 60 Gy of TRT; PC arm, weekly concurrent carboplatin (AUC = 2) and paclitaxel (45 mg/m(2)) plus 60 Gy of TRT.A total of 65 patients were randomized (PE arm, n = 33; PC arm, n = 32). The 3-year overall survival (OS) was significantly better in the PE arm than in the PC arm (33.1% vs. 13%, P = .04). The incidence of Grade 3/4 neutropenia was 78.1% in the PE arm and 51.5% in the PC arm (P = .05). The rate of Grade 2 or greater radiation pneumonitis was 25% in the PE arm and 48.5% in the PC arm (P = .09).Compared to PE regimen, weekly PC regimen cannot be recommended since it failed to achieve an improvement in either OS or PFS.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI