医学
分级(工程)
心理干预
随机对照试验
淋巴水肿
系统回顾
包裹体(矿物)
纳入和排除标准
循证医学
数据提取
梅德林
干预(咨询)
物理疗法
家庭医学
替代医学
护理部
心理学
外科
病理
法学
土木工程
乳腺癌
工程类
内科学
癌症
社会心理学
政治学
作者
Bonnie B. Lasinski,Kathryn Mc Killip Thrift,De Courcy Squire,Melanie K. Austin,Kandis M. Smith,Ausanee Wanchai,Jason M. Green,Bob R. Stewart,Janice N. Cormier,Jane M. Armer
出处
期刊:Pm&r
[Wiley]
日期:2012-08-01
卷期号:4 (8): 580-601
被引量:221
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.05.003
摘要
Objective To critically analyze the contemporary published research that pertains to the individual components of complete decongestive therapy (CDT), as well as CDT as a bundled intervention in the treatment of lymphedema. Data Sources Publications were retrieved from 11 major medical indices for articles published from 2004‐2010 by using search terms for lymphedema and management approaches. Literature archives of the authors and reference lists were examined through 2011. Study Selection A research librarian assisted with initial literature searches by using search terms used in the Best Practice for the Management of Lymphoedema , plus expanded terms, for literature related to lymphedema. Authors sorted relevant literature for inclusion and exclusion; included articles were sorted into topical areas for data extraction and assessment of level of evidence by using a published grading system and consensus process. The authors reviewed 99 articles, of which 26 met inclusion criteria for individual studies and 1 case study did not meet strict inclusion criteria. In addition, 14 review articles and 2 consensus articles were reviewed. Data Extraction Information on study design and/or objectives, participants, outcomes, intervention, results, and study strengths and weaknesses was extracted from each article. Study evidence was categorized according to the Oncology Nursing Society Putting Evidence into Practice level of evidence guidelines after achieving consensus among authors. Data Synthesis Levels of evidence were only moderately strong, because there were few randomized controlled trials with control groups, well‐controlled interventions, and precise measurements of volume, mobility and/or function, and quality of life. Treatment interventions were often bundled, which makes it difficult to determine the contribution of each individual component of treatment to the outcomes achieved. Conclusions CDT is seen to be effective in reducing lymphedema. This review focuses on original research about CDT as a bundled intervention and 2 individual components, manual lymph drainage and compression bandages. Additional studies are needed to determine the value and efficacy of the other individual components of CDT.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI