Posterolateral Versus Posterior Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

医学 Oswestry残疾指数 脊椎滑脱 外科 腰椎 回顾性队列研究 患者满意度 腰痛 病理 替代医学
作者
Jennifer Urquhart,Nabeel Alnaghmoosh,Kevin R. Gurr,Stewart I. Bailey,Corinne Tallon,Shauna Dehens,M. Patricia Rosas Arellano,Christopher S. Bailey
出处
期刊:Clinical spine surgery [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:31 (9): E446-E452 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1097/bsd.0000000000000698
摘要

Study Design: This was a retrospective study of 2 different fusion techniques for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Objective: To determine whether posterior lumbar interbody fusion (IF) is associated with improved patient-rated satisfaction and functional outcome when compared with posterolateral fusion (PLF). Summary of Background Data: IF and PLF are widely used surgical approaches in the treatment of spondylolisthesis. Numerous studies have compared IF and PLF techniques, but inconsistent results, heterogeneous cohorts, and conflicting scientific evidence have made it difficult to reach a consensus on the optimal fusion technique. Materials and Methods: A consecutive cohort of 87 patients who had single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis and either PLF or IF were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Short Form-36 physical and mental component score, Oswestry Disability Index, back and leg pain, and complication rate were assessed to 24 months postoperatively. Patient characteristics, clinical outcome, and complications were compared between groups. Results: Of the 87 patients identified, 29 patients (33%) had PLF and 58 patients (67%) had IF. Patient follow-up was ≥85%. Foraminal stenosis (PLF, 13.8% vs. IF, 34.5%; P =0.046) was more common among the participants in the IF group. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were not different between groups ( P >0.05). The reoperation rate was 3.4% in the PLF group and 10.3% in the IF group ( P =0.416). P atients in the PLF group experienced similar gains in improvement in all outcome measures as those in the IF group ( P >0.05). Four patients in the IF group and 3 in the PLF group were lacking evidence of radiographic fusion. These patients did have increased moderate back pain compared with patients demonstrating radiographic fusion but did not differ in any other postoperative outcomes measures. Conclusions: Type of fusion, IF or PLF, does not affect patient outcome or postoperative complication rates. Level of Evidence Level IV.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
Carol_Wang发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
REXT发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
杨棒棒发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
乐观寻绿完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
平淡睫毛膏完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
自信鞯发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
zhouleiwang发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Lydia完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
REXT完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
杨棒棒完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
13秒前
14秒前
Carol_Wang完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
充电宝应助He采纳,获得10
15秒前
orixero应助11采纳,获得10
15秒前
鲤鱼完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
17秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助114采纳,获得10
18秒前
悦耳诗筠完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
语秋完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
感动的友容完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
bkagyin应助波粒海苔采纳,获得10
20秒前
15248612216完成签到,获得积分20
20秒前
21秒前
熊孩子发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
22秒前
23秒前
温暖元容发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
喵喵喵完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
听寒发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
昏睡的乌冬面完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
27秒前
winter321发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
852应助Yan采纳,获得10
29秒前
29秒前
30秒前
高分求助中
The organometallic chemistry of the transition metals 7th 666
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
Seven new species of the Palaearctic Lauxaniidae and Asteiidae (Diptera) 400
Handbook of Laboratory Animal Science 300
Fundamentals of Medical Device Regulations, Fifth Edition(e-book) 300
A method for calculating the flow in a centrifugal impeller when entropy gradients are present 240
What’s the Evidence? An Investigation into Teacher Quality 200
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3701566
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3251755
关于积分的说明 9876150
捐赠科研通 2963720
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1625279
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 769926
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 742630