Posterolateral Versus Posterior Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

医学 Oswestry残疾指数 脊椎滑脱 外科 腰椎 回顾性队列研究 患者满意度 腰痛 病理 替代医学
作者
Jennifer Urquhart,Nabeel Alnaghmoosh,Kevin R. Gurr,Stewart I. Bailey,Corinne Tallon,Shauna Dehens,M. Patricia Rosas Arellano,Christopher S. Bailey
出处
期刊:Clinical spine surgery [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:31 (9): E446-E452 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1097/bsd.0000000000000698
摘要

Study Design: This was a retrospective study of 2 different fusion techniques for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Objective: To determine whether posterior lumbar interbody fusion (IF) is associated with improved patient-rated satisfaction and functional outcome when compared with posterolateral fusion (PLF). Summary of Background Data: IF and PLF are widely used surgical approaches in the treatment of spondylolisthesis. Numerous studies have compared IF and PLF techniques, but inconsistent results, heterogeneous cohorts, and conflicting scientific evidence have made it difficult to reach a consensus on the optimal fusion technique. Materials and Methods: A consecutive cohort of 87 patients who had single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis and either PLF or IF were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Short Form-36 physical and mental component score, Oswestry Disability Index, back and leg pain, and complication rate were assessed to 24 months postoperatively. Patient characteristics, clinical outcome, and complications were compared between groups. Results: Of the 87 patients identified, 29 patients (33%) had PLF and 58 patients (67%) had IF. Patient follow-up was ≥85%. Foraminal stenosis (PLF, 13.8% vs. IF, 34.5%; P =0.046) was more common among the participants in the IF group. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were not different between groups ( P >0.05). The reoperation rate was 3.4% in the PLF group and 10.3% in the IF group ( P =0.416). P atients in the PLF group experienced similar gains in improvement in all outcome measures as those in the IF group ( P >0.05). Four patients in the IF group and 3 in the PLF group were lacking evidence of radiographic fusion. These patients did have increased moderate back pain compared with patients demonstrating radiographic fusion but did not differ in any other postoperative outcomes measures. Conclusions: Type of fusion, IF or PLF, does not affect patient outcome or postoperative complication rates. Level of Evidence Level IV.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
单薄俊驰发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Demon发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
帅哥完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
慕青应助Fengliguantou采纳,获得10
7秒前
Demon完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Bluebulu完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
今后应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
华仔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
萧水白应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
英姑应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
小蘑菇应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
天天快乐应助阳和启蛰采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
戚雅柔完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
15秒前
单薄俊驰完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
那个笨笨完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
晚湖完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
whisper发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
18秒前
18秒前
胡思乱想发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
胖一达完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
bear发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
涂楚捷完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
椒盐鲨鱼皮发布了新的文献求助100
22秒前
罗又柔应助栗子鱼采纳,获得10
23秒前
科研通AI2S应助whisper采纳,获得10
24秒前
xiaoshu发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
高分求助中
Kinetics of the Esterification Between 2-[(4-hydroxybutoxy)carbonyl] Benzoic Acid with 1,4-Butanediol: Tetrabutyl Orthotitanate as Catalyst 1000
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
Rechtsphilosophie 1000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 888
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
XAFS for Everyone 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3137994
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2788986
关于积分的说明 7789404
捐赠科研通 2445432
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1300328
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 625900
版权声明 601046