Optimal dose of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, venlafaxine, and mirtazapine in major depression: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

文拉法辛 依西酞普兰 米氮平 医学 舍曲林 西酞普兰 氟西汀 荟萃分析 精神科 耐受性 不利影响 内科学 抗抑郁药 焦虑 血清素 受体
作者
Toshi A. Furukawa,Andrea Cipriani,Philip J. Cowen,Stefan Leucht,Matthias Egger,Georgia Salanti
出处
期刊:The Lancet Psychiatry [Elsevier]
卷期号:6 (7): 601-609 被引量:198
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30217-2
摘要

Depression is the single largest contributor to non-fatal health loss worldwide. Second-generation antidepressants are the first-line option for pharmacological management of depression. Optimising their use is crucial in reducing the burden of depression; however, debate about their dose dependency and their optimal target dose is ongoing. We have aimed to summarise the currently available best evidence to inform this clinical question.We did a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of double-blind, randomised controlled trials that examined fixed doses of five selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline), venlafaxine, or mirtazapine in the acute treatment of adults (aged 18 years or older) with major depression, identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, AMED, PSYNDEX, websites of drug licensing agencies and pharmaceutical companies, and trial registries. We imposed no language restrictions, and the search was updated until Jan 8, 2016. Doses of SSRIs were converted to fluoxetine equivalents. Trials of antidepressants for patients with depression and a serious concomitant physical illness were excluded. The main outcomes were efficacy (treatment response defined as 50% or greater reduction in depression severity), tolerability (dropouts due to adverse effects), and acceptability (dropouts for any reasons), all after a median of 8 weeks of treatment (range 4-12 weeks). We used a random-effects, dose-response meta-analysis model with flexible splines for SSRIs, venlafaxine, and mirtazapine.28 554 records were identified through our search (24 524 published and 4030 unpublished records). 561 published and 121 unpublished full-text records were assessed for eligibility, and 77 studies were included (19 364 participants; mean age 42·5 years, SD 11·0; 7156 [60·9%] of 11 749 reported were women). For SSRIs (99 treatment groups), the dose-efficacy curve showed a gradual increase up to doses between 20 mg and 40 mg fluoxetine equivalents, and a flat to decreasing trend through the higher licensed doses up to 80 mg fluoxetine equivalents. Dropouts due to adverse effects increased steeply through the examined range. The relationship between the dose and dropouts for any reason indicated optimal acceptability for the SSRIs in the lower licensed range between 20 mg and 40 mg fluoxetine equivalents. Venlafaxine (16 treatment groups) had an initially increasing dose-efficacy relationship up to around 75-150 mg, followed by a more modest increase, whereas for mirtazapine (11 treatment groups) efficacy increased up to a dose of about 30 mg and then decreased. Both venlafaxine and mirtazapine showed optimal acceptability in the lower range of their licensed dose. These results were robust to several sensitivity analyses.For the most commonly used second-generation antidepressants, the lower range of the licensed dose achieves the optimal balance between efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability in the acute treatment of major depression.Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Swiss National Science Foundation, and National Institute for Health Research.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
cc发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
程勋航完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
HH完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
陆千万完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
我是125应助老疯智采纳,获得10
3秒前
LEE发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Leon完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
愉快的紫丝完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
8秒前
玩命的紫南完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
剁辣椒蒸鱼头完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
牛牛要当院士喽完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
香蕉觅云应助lyt采纳,获得10
12秒前
WJ发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
dbq完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
Owen应助reck采纳,获得10
16秒前
王淳完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
18秒前
高高的天亦完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
追寻书白完成签到,获得积分20
20秒前
晚街听风完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
感觉他香香的完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
牛牛要当院士喽完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
结实的老虎完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
坚强丹雪完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
28秒前
30秒前
WZ0904发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
狂野静曼完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
武映易完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
zzz发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
37秒前
大蒜味酸奶钊完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
Luis Lacasa - Sobre esto y aquello 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527998
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3108225
关于积分的说明 9288086
捐赠科研通 2805889
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1540195
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716950
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709849