Randomized Prospective Trial of Epidural Analgesia after Open Hepatectomy

医学 肝切除术 麻醉 随机对照试验 外科 止痛药 切除术
作者
Vittoria Arslan‐Carlon,Motaz Qadan,Vinay Puttanniah,Kenneth Seier,Mithat Gönen,Gloria Yang,Mary Fischer,Ronald P. DeMatteo,T. Peter Kingham,William R. Jarnagin,Michael I. D’Angelica
出处
期刊:Annals of Surgery [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1097/sla.0000000000006205
摘要

Objective: To evaluate whether patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) improves postoperative pain during ambulation following elective open hepatectomy. Background: Strategies to alleviate postoperative pain are a critical element of recovery after surgery. However, the optimal postoperative pain management strategy following open hepatectomy remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a prospective, non-blinded, randomized comparison of PCEA (intervention) vs. intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA; control) for postoperative pain following elective open hepatectomy. The primary endpoint was pain during ambulation on postoperative day (POD) 2. The study was powered to detect a clinically significant 2-point difference on pain numeric rating scale (NRS). Secondary endpoints included pain at rest, morbidity, time to return of bowel function, and length of stay. Results: From 2015-2020, 231 patients were randomized (116 patients in the PCEA arm and 115 in the IV PCA arm). The incidence of epidural failure was 3% (n=4/116), with no epidural-related complications. Patients in the PCEA arm had a <2 point difference in NRS pain scores during ambulation on POD 2 vs. IV PCA (median 4.0 vs. 5.0, P <0.001). There was no difference in overall complications between the PCEA and IV PCA arms (33% vs. 40%, P =0.276). Secondary outcomes, including pain scores at rest, were similar between the study arms. Conclusions: PCEA was safe following open hepatectomy and was associated with a small difference in pain with activity on POD 2 that did not reach our pre-specified definition of clinical significance.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
心静听炊烟完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
yin景景给yin景景的求助进行了留言
3秒前
6秒前
小魏哥完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
15秒前
19秒前
zhou默完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
英姑应助clcl采纳,获得10
22秒前
研友_LX66qZ完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
ran发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
搜集达人应助大罗采纳,获得10
25秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
CipherSage应助Dai采纳,获得30
27秒前
科研通AI5应助王佳亮采纳,获得10
29秒前
30秒前
33秒前
英姑应助Sea_U采纳,获得10
34秒前
金金金完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
cobo完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
肖肖发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
Rondab应助准炮打不准采纳,获得10
38秒前
ran完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
遇上就这样吧应助YSJ采纳,获得10
39秒前
39秒前
朱1591完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助战斗暴龙兽采纳,获得10
43秒前
43秒前
43秒前
46秒前
YJ888发布了新的文献求助10
46秒前
c_123发布了新的文献求助10
47秒前
SYLH应助科学宝宝☜采纳,获得10
48秒前
clcl发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
可爱蓝天完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
顾矜应助东方红采纳,获得30
50秒前
俭朴的听寒完成签到,获得积分10
51秒前
王了了完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 350
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3989069
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3531351
关于积分的说明 11253589
捐赠科研通 3269939
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1804851
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 882074
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 809073