Closed-loop recycling of lithium iron phosphate cathodic powders via citric acid leaching

浸出(土壤学) 柠檬酸 硫酸 化学 磷酸铁 选择性浸出 无机化学 溶解 湿法冶金 磷酸盐 核化学 有机化学 地质学 土壤科学 土壤水分
作者
Martina Bruno,Carlotta Francia,Silvia Fiore
出处
期刊:Environmental Science and Pollution Research [Springer Nature]
卷期号:32 (48): 27667-27682 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1007/s11356-024-32837-6
摘要

Abstract Lithium recovery from Lithium-ion batteries requires hydrometallurgy but up-to-date technologies aren’t economically viable for Lithium-Iron-Phosphate (LFP) batteries. Selective leaching (specifically targeting Lithium and based on mild organic acids and low temperatures) is attracting attention because of decreased environmental impacts compared to conventional hydrometallurgy. This study analysed the technical and economic performances of selective leaching with 6%vv. H 2 O 2 and citric acid (0.25-1 M, 25 °C, 1 h, 70 g/l) compared with conventional leaching with an inorganic acid (H 2 SO 4 1 M, 40 °C, 2 h, 50 g/l) and an organic acid (citric acid 1 M, 25 °C, 1 h, 70 g/l) to recycle end of life LFP cathodes. After conventional leaching, chemical precipitation allowed to recover in multiple steps Li, Fe and P salts, while selective leaching allowed to recover Fe and P, in the leaching residues and required chemical precipitation only for lithium recovery. Conventional leaching with 1 M acids achieved leaching efficiencies equal to 95 ± 2% for Li, 98 ± 8% for Fe, 96 ± 3% for P with sulfuric acid and 83 ± 0.8% for Li, 8 ± 1% for Fe, 12 ± 5% for P with citric acid. Decreasing citric acid’s concentration from 1 to 0.25 M didn’t substantially change leaching efficiency. Selective leaching with citric acid has higher recovery efficiency (82 ± 6% for Fe, 74 ± 8% for P, 29 ± 5% for Li) than conventional leaching with sulfuric acid (69 ± 15% for Fe, 70 ± 18% for P, and 21 ± 2% for Li). Also, impurities’ amounts were lower with citric acid (335 ± 19 335 ± 19 of S mg/kg of S) than with sulfuric acid (8104 ± 2403 mg/kg of S). In overall, the operative costs associated to 0.25 M citric acid route (3.17€/kg) were lower compared to 1 M sulfuric acid (3.52€/kg). In conclusion, citric acid could be a viable option to lower LFP batteries’ recycling costs, and it should be further explored prioritizing Lithium recovery and purity of recovered materials.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI

祝大家在新的一年里科研腾飞
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
深情安青应助岳岳岳采纳,获得10
1秒前
3秒前
JJ发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
zyz发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
5秒前
罗ning发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
jia发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
弦断陌殇完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
JamesPei应助AZKY采纳,获得10
8秒前
byy发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
隐形以晴完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
S1完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
弦断陌殇发布了新的文献求助100
12秒前
unfeeling8完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
英姑应助sue402采纳,获得10
12秒前
caosenming发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
岳岳岳发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
nicheng完成签到 ,获得积分0
15秒前
共享精神应助魔幻的莫茗采纳,获得10
15秒前
lmf发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
小二郎应助瓦解99采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
chuyi完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
19秒前
Ai完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
可爱的函函应助DDYY采纳,获得10
20秒前
Liquier发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
21秒前
傲安发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
科研通AI2S应助梵墨采纳,获得10
22秒前
22秒前
22秒前
ohh完成签到,获得积分20
22秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 510
《The Emergency Nursing High-Yield Guide》 (或简称为 Emergency Nursing High-Yield Essentials) 500
The Dance of Butch/Femme: The Complementarity and Autonomy of Lesbian Gender Identity 500
Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations 350
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5883745
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 6605619
关于积分的说明 15698039
捐赠科研通 5004295
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2696044
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1639216
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1594630