Evaluating the performance of the language model ChatGPT in responding to common questions of people with epilepsy

癫痫 心理学 认知心理学 语言学 自然语言处理 精神科 计算机科学 哲学
作者
Yuxin Wu,Zaiyu Zhang,Xinyu Dong,Siqi Hong,Yue Hu,Ping Liang,Lusheng Li,Bin Zou,Xuanxuan Wu,Di-Fei Wang,Hui Chen,Hanli Qiu,Haotian Tang,Kaiyi Kang,Qinling Li,Xuan Zhai
出处
期刊:Epilepsy & Behavior [Elsevier]
卷期号:151: 109645-109645 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109645
摘要

Abstract

Objective

People with epilepsy desire to acquire accurate information about epilepsy and actively engage in its management throughout the long journey of living with seizures. ChatGPT is a large language model and we aimed to assess the accuracy and consistency of ChatGPT in responding to the common concerns of people with epilepsy and to evaluate its ability to provide emotional support.

Methods

Questions were collected from the International League against Epilepsy and the China Association against Epilepsy. The responses were independently assessed by two board-certified epileptologists from the China Association against Epilepsy, and a third reviewer resolved disagreements. The reviewers assessed its ability to provide emotional support subjectively.

Results

A total of 378 questions related to epilepsy and 5 questions related to emotional support were included. ChatGPT provided "correct and comprehensive" answers to 68.4% of the questions. The model provided reproducible answers for 82.3% questions. The model performed poorly in answering prognostic questions, with only 46.8% of the answers rated as comprehensive. When faced with questions requiring emotional support, the model can generate natural and understandable responses.

Significance

ChatGPT provides accurate and reliable answers to patients with epilepsy and is a valuable source of information. It also provides partial emotional support, potentially assisting those experiencing emotional distress. However, ChatGPT may provide incorrect responses, leading users to inadvertently accept incorrect and potentially dangerous advice. Therefore, the direct use of ChatGPT for medical guidance is not recommended and its primary use at present is in patients education.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
buno应助懵懂的灭男采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
小咩发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
918578发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
完美世界应助寻觅采纳,获得10
6秒前
天天完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
行行行完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
wwewew完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
12秒前
科目三应助kk采纳,获得10
12秒前
华仔应助ZHI采纳,获得10
13秒前
英姑应助大菠萝采纳,获得10
13秒前
wawaeryu完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
bkagyin应助星愿采纳,获得10
17秒前
wanfeng完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
彭于晏应助七七七采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
lingmuhuahua完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
坚强断缘完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
略略略爱完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
918578完成签到,获得积分20
20秒前
Christian完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
yaoyao发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
22秒前
Epiphany发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
我是老大应助12采纳,获得10
22秒前
anydwason发布了新的文献求助30
23秒前
研究僧发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
卓卓完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
25秒前
Lyhhh发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
kk发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
27秒前
鸭屎香菜发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
小咩发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
Naonaoo发布了新的文献求助30
30秒前
高分求助中
Earth System Geophysics 1000
Co-opetition under Endogenous Bargaining Power 666
Medicina di laboratorio. Logica e patologia clinica 600
Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control, 2nd Edition 500
Sarcolestes leedsi Lydekker, an ankylosaurian dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of England 500
《关于整治突出dupin问题的实施意见》(厅字〔2019〕52号) 500
Language injustice and social equity in EMI policies in China 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3212510
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2861412
关于积分的说明 8128551
捐赠科研通 2527359
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1361003
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 643421
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 615687