沙沙利汀
医学
甘精胰岛素
达帕格列嗪
内科学
糖尿病
胰岛素
2型糖尿病
随机对照试验
置信区间
低血糖
二甲双胍
内分泌学
胃肠病学
磷酸西他列汀
作者
Ernesto Maddaloni,Anda Mihaela Naciu,Carmen Mignogna,Raffaele Galiero,Rocco Amendolara,Marta Fogolari,Chiara Satta,Chiara Serafini,Silvia Angeletti,Maria Gisella Cavallo,Efisio Cossu,Ferdinando Carlo Sasso,Raffaella Buzzetti,Paolo Pozzilli
摘要
Abstract Aim To compare the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin/dapagliflozin and insulin glargine in people with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA). Methods In this phase 2b multicentre, open‐label, comparator‐controlled, parallel‐group, non‐inferiority study, we randomly assigned 33 people with LADA who had a fasting C‐peptide concentration ≥0.2 nmol/L (0.6 ng/mL) to receive 1‐year daily treatment with either the combination of saxagliptin (5 mg) plus dapagliflozin (10 mg) or insulin glargine (starting dose: 10 IU), both on top of metformin. The primary outcome was the 2‐h mixed meal‐stimulated C‐peptide area under the curve (AUC), measured 12 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes were glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, change in body mass index (BMI), and hypoglycaemic events. Results In the modified intention‐to‐treat analysis, the primary outcome was similar in participants assigned to saxagliptin/dapagliflozin or to insulin glargine (median C‐peptide AUC: 152.0 ng*min/mL [95% confidence interval {CI} 68.2; 357.4] vs. 122.2 ng*min/mL [95% CI 84.3; 255.8]; p for noninferiority = 0.0087). Participants randomized to saxagliptin/dapagliflozin lost more weight than those randomized to insulin glargine (median BMI change at the end of the study: −0.4 kg/m 2 [95% CI −1.6; −0.3] vs. +0.4 kg/m 2 [95% CI −0.3; +1.1]; p = 0.0076). No differences in HbA1c or in the number of participants experiencing hypoglycaemic events were found. Conclusions Saxagliptin/dapagliflozin was non‐inferior to glargine in terms of β‐cell function in this 12‐month, small, phase 2b study, enrolling people with LADA with still viable endogenous insulin production. Weight loss was greater with saxagliptin/dapagliflozin, with no differences in glycaemic control or hypoglycaemic risk.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI