Persistent high sepsis-induced coagulopathy and sequential organ failure assessment scores can predict the 28-day mortality of patients with sepsis: A prospective study

医学 败血症 沙发评分 凝血病 内科学 前瞻性队列研究 严重败血症 感染性休克
作者
Junyu Li,Huizhen Liu,Na Wang,Feng-Rong Wang,Na Shang,Shubin Guo,Guodong Wang
出处
期刊:BMC Infectious Diseases [Springer Nature]
卷期号:24 (1) 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1186/s12879-024-09154-x
摘要

Abstract Background The performance of the sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores in predicting the prognoses of patients with sepsis has been validated. This study aimed to investigate the time course of SIC and SOFA scores and their association with outcomes in patients with sepsis. Methods This prospective study enrolled 209 patients with sepsis admitted to the emergency department. The SIC and SOFA scores of the patients were assessed on days 1, 2, and 4. Patients were categorized into survivor or non-survivor groups based on their 28-day survival. We conducted a generalized estimating equation analysis to evaluate the time course of SIC and SOFA scores and the corresponding differences between the two groups. The predictive value of SIC and SOFA scores at different time points for sepsis prognosis was evaluated. Results In the non-survivor group, SIC and SOFA scores gradually increased during the first 4 days ( P < 0.05). In the survivor group, the SIC and SOFA scores on day 2 were significantly higher than those on day 1 ( P < 0.05); however, they decreased on day 4, dropping below the levels observed on day 1 ( P < 0.05). The non-survivors showed higher SIC scores on days 2 ( P < 0.05) and 4 ( P < 0.001) than the survivors, whereas no significant differences were found between the two groups on day 1 ( P > 0.05). The performance of SIC scores on day 4 for predicting mortality was more accurate than that on day 2, with areas under the curve of 0.749 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.674–0.823), and 0.601 (95% CI: 0.524–0.679), respectively. The SIC scores demonstrated comparable predictive accuracy for 28-day mortality to the SOFA scores on days 2 and 4. Cox proportional hazards models indicated that SIC on day 4 (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.736; 95% CI: 2.025–6.891) was an independent risk factor for 28-day mortality. Conclusions The time course of SIC and SOFA scores differed between surviving and non-surviving patients with sepsis, and persistent high SIC and SOFA scores can predict 28-day mortality.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
酷波er应助失眠夏之采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
afterly发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
3秒前
星河zp发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
故城完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
失眠夏之完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
ssk发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Lucas应助未曾提起采纳,获得10
5秒前
努力看文献的大头完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
飞飞鱼完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
bkagyin应助REBACK采纳,获得10
5秒前
Akim应助雪山飞龙采纳,获得20
7秒前
Xiaoxiannv完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
三叔应助星河zp采纳,获得10
8秒前
星辰发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
zyq应助柯善若采纳,获得10
10秒前
SmoonYK完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
巴拉巴拉发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
与我常在发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
yud发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
基础题应助独特的凝荷采纳,获得10
17秒前
星河zp完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
冯小逢发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
zmx完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
REBACK发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
FashionBoy应助布丁采纳,获得10
21秒前
zero完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
23秒前
NexusExplorer应助ssk采纳,获得10
23秒前
外向的雁玉完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
今后应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
25秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
Kinetics of the Esterification Between 2-[(4-hydroxybutoxy)carbonyl] Benzoic Acid with 1,4-Butanediol: Tetrabutyl Orthotitanate as Catalyst 1000
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
Rechtsphilosophie 1000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 888
Handbook of Qualitative Cross-Cultural Research Methods 600
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3137511
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2788516
关于积分的说明 7786944
捐赠科研通 2444783
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1300018
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 625770
版权声明 601023