铜绿假单胞菌
磷霉素
琼脂稀释
肉汤微量稀释
微生物学
最小抑制浓度
生物
抗生素
细菌
遗传学
作者
Marco Peradotto,Alessandro Bondi,Gabriele Bianco,Marco Iannaccone,Anna Maria Barbui,Cristina Costa,Rossana Cavallo
出处
期刊:Microbial Drug Resistance
[Mary Ann Liebert]
日期:2022-08-11
卷期号:28 (9): 911-915
被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1089/mdr.2021.0410
摘要
The lack of internationally approved breakpoint and a handy susceptibility testing reduces fosfomycin usefulness against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Previous works defined low or moderate agreement between commercial methods and the reference method (agar dilution [AD]). In particular, data lack about testing against P. aeruginosa. We compared disk diffusion (DD), E-test (ET), and automated broth microdilution (BMD) to AD by testing 150 P. aeruginosa isolates. We obtained better categorical agreement (CA) for DD and ET for minimal inhibitory concentration >128 mg/L (84.7% and 92.7%, respectively), but with high very major error (VME). BMD had the lowest VME rate (2/42), but with 64% CA and 52/108 major errors. We cannot define a method comparable to AD. Larger studies, as well as the definition of a breakpoint value are needed for fosfomycin against P. aeruginosa.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI