Teacher assessment literacy: a systematic review

审查 问责 读写能力 背景(考古学) 数学教育 教育评估 教育学 集合(抽象数据类型) 真实性评价 标准化测试 心理学 医学教育 课程 计算机科学 政治学 医学 法学 生物 程序设计语言 古生物学
作者
Serafina Pastore
出处
期刊:Frontiers in Education [Frontiers Media]
卷期号:8 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.3389/feduc.2023.1217167
摘要

Teacher assessment literacy, generally defined as a set of knowledge and skills a teacher needs to effectively enact assessment in the classroom, has been a priority in the educational policy and educational research agenda for decades. For a long time, it has been identified with standardized measurement and classroom testing. The interest in this topic is related not only to the accountability pressures and the identification of assessment as a lever for school and system reform but also to the need for teachers to support student learning by developing and implementing responsive assessments within their classrooms. Considerable efforts have been made to prepare novice and expert teachers in understanding how to deal with aspects of assessment practice and how to use the assessment results. Although the research on teacher assessment literacy is quite wide, it continues to demonstrate how teachers struggle with assessment, especially when they are required to transfer new approaches and theories into the actual classroom context. This systematic review synthetizes the literature on teacher assessment literacy considering how it has been defined and studied over the last 10 years (2013–2022). Documenting and comparing the different expressions and definitions of assessment literacy used in the 42 selected studies, this systematic review offers a detailed overview of the changes that occurred in the conceptualizations of assessment literacy. Along with the analysis of the theoretical/conceptual frameworks and research methods used to investigate teacher assessment literacy, the scrutiny of its foundational components represents a useful base to orient pre- and in-service teacher education. Against the backdrop of strengths and weaknesses of this review, research priorities and practical implications of the findings are discussed.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
聪明三娘发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
叁壹捌完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
赘婿应助小幻螺采纳,获得10
1秒前
SSS完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
啾啾完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
瘦瘦的饼干完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
1234完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
3秒前
传奇3应助wangqing采纳,获得10
3秒前
彭于晏应助mairs采纳,获得10
5秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
奉年发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
青杉杉完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
迟大猫给曲曲的求助进行了留言
7秒前
汉堡包应助瘦瘦的饼干采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
11秒前
田様应助1234采纳,获得10
12秒前
我不是很帅完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
14秒前
15秒前
沉默飞松完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
莫名其妙应助Llllll采纳,获得30
15秒前
16秒前
77发布了新的文献求助30
16秒前
17秒前
cdercder应助勤奋大地采纳,获得20
17秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
rtx00发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
陈陈陈发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
1762120发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
啊娴仔完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
24秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, Global Edition, 6th edition 600
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
Walter Gilbert: Selected Works 500
An Annotated Checklist of Dinosaur Species by Continent 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3659127
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3220858
关于积分的说明 9738066
捐赠科研通 2930135
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1604224
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 757172
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 734273