Temporal Trends and Variation in Bronchoscopy Use for Acute Respiratory Failure in the United States

医学 支气管镜检查 观察研究 优势比 机械通风 呼吸衰竭 急诊医学 内科学 外科
作者
Max T Wayne,Thomas S. Valley,Douglas A. Arenberg,José De Cardenas,H.C. Prescott
出处
期刊:Chest [Elsevier]
卷期号:163 (1): 128-138 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2022.08.2210
摘要

Background National data on bronchoscopy for the evaluation of acute respiratory failure are lacking, and the limited available data suggest wide variation in use. Research Question How commonly is bronchoscopy performed among patients with acute respiratory failure? How has use changed over time and across hospitals? Study Design and Methods This was an observational cohort study of adult hospitalized patients (2012-2018) treated with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) using the National Inpatient Sample, which represents 97% of all hospitalizations in the United States. We measured the proportion of hospitalized patients treated with IMV who underwent bronchoscopy and assessed trends in bronchoscopy use over time. Multilevel linear regression models were used to quantify hospital-level variation, adjusting for differences in patient and hospital characteristics. Results We identified 6,101,070 IMV-treated hospitalized patients (2012-2018), of whom 609,405 underwent bronchoscopy; among hospitalized patients receiving bronchoscopy, mean age was 61 years, 41.8% were women, and in-hospital mortality was 30.8%. The percentage of IMV-treated hospitalized patients receiving bronchoscopy increased from 9.5% (95% CI, 9.1%-9.9%) in 2012 to 10.8% (95% CI, 10.4%-11.2%) in 2018 (P < .001 for difference). In 2018, bronchoscopy use varied from 0% to 57.1% among 1,787 hospitals, and in multilevel models adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics, 16.0% of the variation was explained at the hospital level. The median OR was 2.13 (95% CI, 2.05-2.21), indicating 113% increased odds of receiving bronchoscopy if moving from a lower-use to a higher-use hospital. Interpretation Bronchoscopy use among hospitalized patients treated with IMV has increased over time. The large variation in use of bronchoscopy across hospitals suggests potentially unwarranted practice variation and need for further studies to clarify which patients benefit from bronchoscopy. National data on bronchoscopy for the evaluation of acute respiratory failure are lacking, and the limited available data suggest wide variation in use. How commonly is bronchoscopy performed among patients with acute respiratory failure? How has use changed over time and across hospitals? This was an observational cohort study of adult hospitalized patients (2012-2018) treated with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) using the National Inpatient Sample, which represents 97% of all hospitalizations in the United States. We measured the proportion of hospitalized patients treated with IMV who underwent bronchoscopy and assessed trends in bronchoscopy use over time. Multilevel linear regression models were used to quantify hospital-level variation, adjusting for differences in patient and hospital characteristics. We identified 6,101,070 IMV-treated hospitalized patients (2012-2018), of whom 609,405 underwent bronchoscopy; among hospitalized patients receiving bronchoscopy, mean age was 61 years, 41.8% were women, and in-hospital mortality was 30.8%. The percentage of IMV-treated hospitalized patients receiving bronchoscopy increased from 9.5% (95% CI, 9.1%-9.9%) in 2012 to 10.8% (95% CI, 10.4%-11.2%) in 2018 (P < .001 for difference). In 2018, bronchoscopy use varied from 0% to 57.1% among 1,787 hospitals, and in multilevel models adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics, 16.0% of the variation was explained at the hospital level. The median OR was 2.13 (95% CI, 2.05-2.21), indicating 113% increased odds of receiving bronchoscopy if moving from a lower-use to a higher-use hospital. Bronchoscopy use among hospitalized patients treated with IMV has increased over time. The large variation in use of bronchoscopy across hospitals suggests potentially unwarranted practice variation and need for further studies to clarify which patients benefit from bronchoscopy.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Nothing完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Alex-Song完成签到 ,获得积分0
5秒前
茶茶同学完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
传奇3应助R1采纳,获得10
12秒前
大力诺言完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
chiien完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
宋温暖应助lizuosheng1972采纳,获得20
17秒前
ZXD1989完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
阿辉完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
cq_2完成签到,获得积分0
27秒前
唐帅发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
轻松幼南完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
31秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
34秒前
34秒前
lyw发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
35秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
35秒前
35秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
35秒前
35秒前
35秒前
35秒前
35秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
35秒前
深情安青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
35秒前
xie完成签到 ,获得积分0
39秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
49秒前
limecho发布了新的文献求助10
49秒前
坚强的红牛完成签到 ,获得积分10
54秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
研友_5Zl4VZ完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Perrylin718完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
wangfang0228完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine Third Edition 5000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Agyptische Geschichte der 21.30. Dynastie 3000
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1510
从k到英国情人 1500
Cummings Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 8th Edition 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5764947
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5556663
关于积分的说明 15406774
捐赠科研通 4899842
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2636046
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1584226
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1539538