Temporal Trends and Variation in Bronchoscopy Use for Acute Respiratory Failure in the United States

医学 支气管镜检查 观察研究 优势比 机械通风 呼吸衰竭 急诊医学 内科学 外科
作者
Max T Wayne,Thomas S. Valley,Douglas A. Arenberg,José De Cardenas,H.C. Prescott
出处
期刊:Chest [Elsevier]
卷期号:163 (1): 128-138 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2022.08.2210
摘要

Background National data on bronchoscopy for the evaluation of acute respiratory failure are lacking, and the limited available data suggest wide variation in use. Research Question How commonly is bronchoscopy performed among patients with acute respiratory failure? How has use changed over time and across hospitals? Study Design and Methods This was an observational cohort study of adult hospitalized patients (2012-2018) treated with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) using the National Inpatient Sample, which represents 97% of all hospitalizations in the United States. We measured the proportion of hospitalized patients treated with IMV who underwent bronchoscopy and assessed trends in bronchoscopy use over time. Multilevel linear regression models were used to quantify hospital-level variation, adjusting for differences in patient and hospital characteristics. Results We identified 6,101,070 IMV-treated hospitalized patients (2012-2018), of whom 609,405 underwent bronchoscopy; among hospitalized patients receiving bronchoscopy, mean age was 61 years, 41.8% were women, and in-hospital mortality was 30.8%. The percentage of IMV-treated hospitalized patients receiving bronchoscopy increased from 9.5% (95% CI, 9.1%-9.9%) in 2012 to 10.8% (95% CI, 10.4%-11.2%) in 2018 (P < .001 for difference). In 2018, bronchoscopy use varied from 0% to 57.1% among 1,787 hospitals, and in multilevel models adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics, 16.0% of the variation was explained at the hospital level. The median OR was 2.13 (95% CI, 2.05-2.21), indicating 113% increased odds of receiving bronchoscopy if moving from a lower-use to a higher-use hospital. Interpretation Bronchoscopy use among hospitalized patients treated with IMV has increased over time. The large variation in use of bronchoscopy across hospitals suggests potentially unwarranted practice variation and need for further studies to clarify which patients benefit from bronchoscopy. National data on bronchoscopy for the evaluation of acute respiratory failure are lacking, and the limited available data suggest wide variation in use. How commonly is bronchoscopy performed among patients with acute respiratory failure? How has use changed over time and across hospitals? This was an observational cohort study of adult hospitalized patients (2012-2018) treated with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) using the National Inpatient Sample, which represents 97% of all hospitalizations in the United States. We measured the proportion of hospitalized patients treated with IMV who underwent bronchoscopy and assessed trends in bronchoscopy use over time. Multilevel linear regression models were used to quantify hospital-level variation, adjusting for differences in patient and hospital characteristics. We identified 6,101,070 IMV-treated hospitalized patients (2012-2018), of whom 609,405 underwent bronchoscopy; among hospitalized patients receiving bronchoscopy, mean age was 61 years, 41.8% were women, and in-hospital mortality was 30.8%. The percentage of IMV-treated hospitalized patients receiving bronchoscopy increased from 9.5% (95% CI, 9.1%-9.9%) in 2012 to 10.8% (95% CI, 10.4%-11.2%) in 2018 (P < .001 for difference). In 2018, bronchoscopy use varied from 0% to 57.1% among 1,787 hospitals, and in multilevel models adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics, 16.0% of the variation was explained at the hospital level. The median OR was 2.13 (95% CI, 2.05-2.21), indicating 113% increased odds of receiving bronchoscopy if moving from a lower-use to a higher-use hospital. Bronchoscopy use among hospitalized patients treated with IMV has increased over time. The large variation in use of bronchoscopy across hospitals suggests potentially unwarranted practice variation and need for further studies to clarify which patients benefit from bronchoscopy.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
游佩君发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
kkk完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
zhengyalan发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
CX完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
慕青应助hahahah采纳,获得10
3秒前
mark707发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
小巍澜完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
qiu发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
6秒前
哇嘞完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
小蘑菇应助周周采纳,获得30
7秒前
FashionBoy应助hellokitty采纳,获得10
7秒前
耍酷小松鼠完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
欢呼的开山完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
哈哈哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
13秒前
年禹发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
ellarqwn完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
田田完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
蔓蔓要努力完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
洒脱完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
浮游应助luobote采纳,获得10
20秒前
无极微光应助盐消采纳,获得20
22秒前
李lll发布了新的文献求助30
22秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
汉堡包应助高兴的海亦采纳,获得10
24秒前
科目三应助高兴的海亦采纳,获得10
24秒前
Jasper应助高兴的海亦采纳,获得10
24秒前
华仔应助高兴的海亦采纳,获得10
24秒前
bkagyin应助高兴的海亦采纳,获得10
24秒前
852应助高兴的海亦采纳,获得10
24秒前
wanci应助高兴的海亦采纳,获得10
24秒前
小马甲应助高兴的海亦采纳,获得10
24秒前
24秒前
SciGPT应助高兴的海亦采纳,获得10
24秒前
别生气完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.).. Frederic G. Reamer 1070
Alloy Phase Diagrams 1000
Introduction to Early Childhood Education 1000
2025-2031年中国兽用抗生素行业发展深度调研与未来趋势报告 1000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 891
Historical Dictionary of British Intelligence (2014 / 2nd EDITION!) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5424595
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4538935
关于积分的说明 14164426
捐赠科研通 4455911
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2443990
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1435069
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1412452