Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of thoracic epidural analgesia and rectus sheath block in laparoscopic abdominal surgery: A randomized controlled noninferiority trial

医学 外科 止痛药 麻醉 腹腔镜手术 随机对照试验 腹部外科 随机化 腹直肌鞘 可视模拟标度 不利影响 患者满意度 腹腔镜检查 腹壁 内科学
作者
Yohei Owada,Yuya Murata,Yuto Hamaguchi,Kumiko Yamada,Shinichi Inomata,Koichi Ogawa,Yusuke Ohara,Yosihimasa Akashi,Tsuyoshi Enomoto,Kazushi Maruo,Makoto Tanaka,Tatsuya Oda
出处
期刊:Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery [Wiley]
卷期号:16 (3): 423-431 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1111/ases.13180
摘要

In the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program, abdominal wall blocks are strongly recommended as postoperative multimodal analgesia for laparoscopic abdominal surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of single-shot rectus sheath block (RSB) with that of thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) as a method of multimodal analgesia in patients receiving conventional laparoscopic abdominal surgery.A noninferiority comparison was performed. Patients scheduled for laparoscopic gastric or colorectal surgery were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided randomly into two groups: TEA and RSB. The primary endpoint was the numerical rating scale (NRS) score upon coughing as of 24 hours after surgery.In total, 80 patients were randomly assigned to receive TEA (n = 42) or RSB (n = 38). Three patients were excluded from the TEA group after randomization. The NRS score on coughing as of 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the TEA group than in the RSB group (least square mean: 3.59 vs 6.39; 95% confidence interval for the difference: 1.87 to 3.74, P < .001). The NRS scores upon coughing and at rest were significantly lower in the TEA group than in the RSB group as of 4, 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia was significantly higher in the TEA group. Postoperative adverse events were not significantly different between groups.This is the first report of comparing RSB with TEA in laparoscopic surgery. TEA may be recommended as a multimodal analgesia protocol for laparoscopic gastric and colorectal surgery.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
hongyi关注了科研通微信公众号
刚刚
1111111完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
Leo完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
顾矜应助ice采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
xiaobai发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
爆米花应助peng采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
YaoHui发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
liuxinyu发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
magic_sweets发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
orixero应助小文采纳,获得30
5秒前
今后应助去瞧瞧采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
克明发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
祖艺洋发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
傅劲哲发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
hawa12应助忐忑的马里奥采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
Leo发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
结果诠释过往完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
ice完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
FashionBoy应助WQ采纳,获得10
11秒前
彭于晏应助NIU采纳,获得10
12秒前
15秒前
15秒前
Hz完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
17秒前
画饼品鉴师应助WATQ采纳,获得20
17秒前
赘婿应助悠然采纳,获得10
17秒前
万能图书馆应助成成成采纳,获得30
18秒前
18秒前
ZBRTZY完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
20秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 2000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Curating Socialism: A Handbook of International Art Exhibitions 1947-1989 750
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7525767
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9112504
关于积分的说明 19461132
捐赠科研通 7128144
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3255571
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2423487
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2242957