Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of thoracic epidural analgesia and rectus sheath block in laparoscopic abdominal surgery: A randomized controlled noninferiority trial

医学 外科 止痛药 麻醉 腹腔镜手术 随机对照试验 腹部外科 随机化 腹直肌鞘 可视模拟标度 不利影响 患者满意度 腹腔镜检查 腹壁 内科学
作者
Yohei Owada,Yuya Murata,Yuto Hamaguchi,Kumiko Yamada,Shinichi Inomata,Koichi Ogawa,Yusuke Ohara,Yosihimasa Akashi,Tsuyoshi Enomoto,Kazushi Maruo,Makoto Tanaka,Tatsuya Oda
出处
期刊:Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery [Wiley]
卷期号:16 (3): 423-431 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1111/ases.13180
摘要

In the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program, abdominal wall blocks are strongly recommended as postoperative multimodal analgesia for laparoscopic abdominal surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of single-shot rectus sheath block (RSB) with that of thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) as a method of multimodal analgesia in patients receiving conventional laparoscopic abdominal surgery.A noninferiority comparison was performed. Patients scheduled for laparoscopic gastric or colorectal surgery were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided randomly into two groups: TEA and RSB. The primary endpoint was the numerical rating scale (NRS) score upon coughing as of 24 hours after surgery.In total, 80 patients were randomly assigned to receive TEA (n = 42) or RSB (n = 38). Three patients were excluded from the TEA group after randomization. The NRS score on coughing as of 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the TEA group than in the RSB group (least square mean: 3.59 vs 6.39; 95% confidence interval for the difference: 1.87 to 3.74, P < .001). The NRS scores upon coughing and at rest were significantly lower in the TEA group than in the RSB group as of 4, 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia was significantly higher in the TEA group. Postoperative adverse events were not significantly different between groups.This is the first report of comparing RSB with TEA in laparoscopic surgery. TEA may be recommended as a multimodal analgesia protocol for laparoscopic gastric and colorectal surgery.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
qiqiqiqiqi完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
舒适的梦玉完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
大大超发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
MO关闭了MO的文献求助
1秒前
1秒前
荒岛发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
帝青坤灵完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
领导范儿的应助被缪甲烷采纳,获得10
2秒前
tuanzi发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
直率的松鼠完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
在水一方的应助被alqb采纳,获得10
4秒前
立青完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
南曦发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
hzjsxc完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
Elias完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
uuu发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
田様的应助被Lin采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
Honny完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
小姜完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
lin发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
JC发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
xiangganggeng发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
一个酒窝发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
传奇3的应助被复杂念梦采纳,获得10
11秒前
调皮钱钱发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
搞怪的老九的应助被爱吃香菜采纳,获得10
13秒前
小明发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
xyzlancet发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
阿修完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Mathematical models in hydrology 1000
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Oncology Clinical Trials: Successful Design, Conduct, and Analysis, Second Edition 800
Erzählte Gnade 500
Butadiene hydroxytelechelic oligomers PBHT 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8083080
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9498243
关于积分的说明 21405787
捐赠科研通 7651296
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3402130
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2531143
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2440811