Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin gestations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 产科 相对风险 妊娠期 置信区间 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 早产 安慰剂 怀孕 妇科 内科学 生物 遗传学 替代医学 病理
作者
Agustín Conde‐Agudelo,Roberto Romero,Anoop Rehal,Maria de Lourdes Brizot,Vicente Serra,Eduardo Da Fonseca,Elçin Çetingöz,Argyro Syngelaki,Alfredo Perales,Sonia S. Hassan,K. H. Nicolaides
出处
期刊:American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [Elsevier]
卷期号:229 (6): 599-616.e3 被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.05.010
摘要

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin gestations.

Data Sources

MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, and CINAHL (from their inception to January 31, 2023), Cochrane databases, Google Scholar, bibliographies, and conference proceedings.

Study Eligibility Criteria

Randomized controlled trials that compared vaginal progesterone to placebo or no treatment in asymptomatic women with a twin gestation.

Methods

The systematic review was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The primary outcome was preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes included adverse perinatal outcomes. Pooled relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. We assessed the risk of bias in each included study, heterogeneity, publication bias, and quality of evidence, and performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

Results

Eleven studies (3401 women and 6802 fetuses/infants) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among all twin gestations, there were no significant differences between the vaginal progesterone and placebo or no treatment groups in the risk of preterm birth <34 weeks (relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.84–1.17; high-quality evidence), <37 weeks (relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.92–1.06; high-quality evidence), and <28 weeks (relative risk, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.64–1.55; moderate-quality evidence), and spontaneous preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation (relative risk, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.80–1.18; high-quality evidence). Vaginal progesterone had no significant effect on any of the perinatal outcomes evaluated. Subgroup analyses showed that there was no evidence of a different effect of vaginal progesterone on preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation related to chorionicity, type of conception, history of spontaneous preterm birth, daily dose of vaginal progesterone, and gestational age at initiation of treatment. The frequencies of preterm birth <37, <34, <32, <30, and <28 weeks of gestation and adverse perinatal outcomes did not significantly differ between the vaginal progesterone and placebo or no treatment groups in unselected twin gestations (8 studies; 3274 women and 6548 fetuses/infants). Among twin gestations with a transvaginal sonographic cervical length <30 mm (6 studies; 306 women and 612 fetuses/infants), vaginal progesterone was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of preterm birth occurring at <28 to <32 gestational weeks (relative risks, 0.48–0.65; moderate- to high-quality evidence), neonatal death (relative risk, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.11–0.92; moderate-quality evidence), and birthweight <1500 g (relative risk, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.39–0.88; high-quality evidence). Vaginal progesterone significantly reduced the risk of preterm birth occurring at <28 to <34 gestational weeks (relative risks, 0.41–0.68), composite neonatal morbidity and mortality (relative risk, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.98), and birthweight <1500 g (relative risk, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.94) in twin gestations with a transvaginal sonographic cervical length ≤25 mm (6 studies; 95 women and 190 fetuses/infants). The quality of evidence was moderate for all these outcomes.

Conclusion

Vaginal progesterone does not prevent preterm birth, nor does it improve perinatal outcomes in unselected twin gestations, but it appears to reduce the risk of preterm birth occurring at early gestational ages and of neonatal morbidity and mortality in twin gestations with a sonographic short cervix. However, more evidence is needed before recommending this intervention to this subset of patients.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
laodie发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
小达完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
nenoaowu发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
文章要有性价比完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
俏皮半烟完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Aki发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
111完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
耗尽完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
烂漫驳发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
轻松的贞完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
李健应助balzacsun采纳,获得10
7秒前
轻松的悟空完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
susan完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
0029完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Aki完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
14秒前
15秒前
LXR完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
thchiang发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
李健应助北城采纳,获得10
18秒前
WDK发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
轻松的贞发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
医学生Mavis完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
nextconnie完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
汉堡包应助yyj采纳,获得10
22秒前
zqh740发布了新的文献求助30
23秒前
24秒前
NexusExplorer应助pharmstudent采纳,获得10
25秒前
熊遇蜜完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
panzer完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
29秒前
lyt发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
六月毕业关注了科研通微信公众号
31秒前
petrichor应助程程采纳,获得10
32秒前
圆儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
潇洒的灵萱完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
Luis Lacasa - Sobre esto y aquello 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527990
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3108173
关于积分的说明 9287913
捐赠科研通 2805882
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1540119
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716941
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709824