Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin gestations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 产科 相对风险 妊娠期 置信区间 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 早产 安慰剂 怀孕 妇科 内科学 生物 遗传学 替代医学 病理
作者
Agustín Conde‐Agudelo,Roberto Romero,Anoop Rehal,Maria de Lourdes Brizot,Vicente Serra,Eduardo Da Fonseca,Elçin Çetingöz,Argyro Syngelaki,Alfredo Perales,Sonia S. Hassan,K. H. Nicolaides
出处
期刊:American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [Elsevier]
卷期号:229 (6): 599-616.e3 被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.05.010
摘要

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin gestations.

Data Sources

MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, and CINAHL (from their inception to January 31, 2023), Cochrane databases, Google Scholar, bibliographies, and conference proceedings.

Study Eligibility Criteria

Randomized controlled trials that compared vaginal progesterone to placebo or no treatment in asymptomatic women with a twin gestation.

Methods

The systematic review was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The primary outcome was preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes included adverse perinatal outcomes. Pooled relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. We assessed the risk of bias in each included study, heterogeneity, publication bias, and quality of evidence, and performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

Results

Eleven studies (3401 women and 6802 fetuses/infants) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among all twin gestations, there were no significant differences between the vaginal progesterone and placebo or no treatment groups in the risk of preterm birth <34 weeks (relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.84–1.17; high-quality evidence), <37 weeks (relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.92–1.06; high-quality evidence), and <28 weeks (relative risk, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.64–1.55; moderate-quality evidence), and spontaneous preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation (relative risk, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.80–1.18; high-quality evidence). Vaginal progesterone had no significant effect on any of the perinatal outcomes evaluated. Subgroup analyses showed that there was no evidence of a different effect of vaginal progesterone on preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation related to chorionicity, type of conception, history of spontaneous preterm birth, daily dose of vaginal progesterone, and gestational age at initiation of treatment. The frequencies of preterm birth <37, <34, <32, <30, and <28 weeks of gestation and adverse perinatal outcomes did not significantly differ between the vaginal progesterone and placebo or no treatment groups in unselected twin gestations (8 studies; 3274 women and 6548 fetuses/infants). Among twin gestations with a transvaginal sonographic cervical length <30 mm (6 studies; 306 women and 612 fetuses/infants), vaginal progesterone was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of preterm birth occurring at <28 to <32 gestational weeks (relative risks, 0.48–0.65; moderate- to high-quality evidence), neonatal death (relative risk, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.11–0.92; moderate-quality evidence), and birthweight <1500 g (relative risk, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.39–0.88; high-quality evidence). Vaginal progesterone significantly reduced the risk of preterm birth occurring at <28 to <34 gestational weeks (relative risks, 0.41–0.68), composite neonatal morbidity and mortality (relative risk, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.98), and birthweight <1500 g (relative risk, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.94) in twin gestations with a transvaginal sonographic cervical length ≤25 mm (6 studies; 95 women and 190 fetuses/infants). The quality of evidence was moderate for all these outcomes.

Conclusion

Vaginal progesterone does not prevent preterm birth, nor does it improve perinatal outcomes in unselected twin gestations, but it appears to reduce the risk of preterm birth occurring at early gestational ages and of neonatal morbidity and mortality in twin gestations with a sonographic short cervix. However, more evidence is needed before recommending this intervention to this subset of patients.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
3秒前
云成阙发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
hana发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
上官若男应助科研喵采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
李爱国应助许诺采纳,获得10
5秒前
爆米花应助荣荣采纳,获得10
5秒前
大个应助YSY005采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
万能图书馆应助somnus_fu采纳,获得10
7秒前
852应助山大琦子采纳,获得10
8秒前
研友_Z7myRL完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
yuxia发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
科目三应助贠子璇采纳,获得10
9秒前
括囊发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
段采萱完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
13秒前
14秒前
大模型应助洁净思枫采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
小二郎应助一颗土豆采纳,获得10
17秒前
我要O泡果奶完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
科研通AI6.2应助mikasa采纳,获得20
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
SCI发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
脑洞疼应助汪小楠吖采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
所所应助zcxxxxxxx采纳,获得10
21秒前
llfire发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
润润轩轩发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
ray发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
VASCULITIS(血管炎)Rheumatic Disease Clinics (Clinics Review Articles) —— 《风湿病临床》(临床综述文章) 1000
Feldspar inclusion dating of ceramics and burnt stones 1000
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in a Digital Age? 801
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
Digital and Social Media Marketing 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5977450
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7338065
关于积分的说明 16010164
捐赠科研通 5116845
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2746683
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1715088
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1623852