Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin gestations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 产科 相对风险 妊娠期 置信区间 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 早产 安慰剂 怀孕 妇科 内科学 生物 遗传学 替代医学 病理
作者
Agustín Conde‐Agudelo,Roberto Romero,Anoop Rehal,Maria de Lourdes Brizot,Vicente Serra,Eduardo Da Fonseca,Elçin Çetingöz,Argyro Syngelaki,Alfredo Perales,Sonia S. Hassan,K. H. Nicolaides
出处
期刊:American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:229 (6): 599-616.e3 被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.05.010
摘要

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin gestations.

Data Sources

MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, and CINAHL (from their inception to January 31, 2023), Cochrane databases, Google Scholar, bibliographies, and conference proceedings.

Study Eligibility Criteria

Randomized controlled trials that compared vaginal progesterone to placebo or no treatment in asymptomatic women with a twin gestation.

Methods

The systematic review was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The primary outcome was preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes included adverse perinatal outcomes. Pooled relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. We assessed the risk of bias in each included study, heterogeneity, publication bias, and quality of evidence, and performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

Results

Eleven studies (3401 women and 6802 fetuses/infants) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among all twin gestations, there were no significant differences between the vaginal progesterone and placebo or no treatment groups in the risk of preterm birth <34 weeks (relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.84–1.17; high-quality evidence), <37 weeks (relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.92–1.06; high-quality evidence), and <28 weeks (relative risk, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.64–1.55; moderate-quality evidence), and spontaneous preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation (relative risk, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.80–1.18; high-quality evidence). Vaginal progesterone had no significant effect on any of the perinatal outcomes evaluated. Subgroup analyses showed that there was no evidence of a different effect of vaginal progesterone on preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation related to chorionicity, type of conception, history of spontaneous preterm birth, daily dose of vaginal progesterone, and gestational age at initiation of treatment. The frequencies of preterm birth <37, <34, <32, <30, and <28 weeks of gestation and adverse perinatal outcomes did not significantly differ between the vaginal progesterone and placebo or no treatment groups in unselected twin gestations (8 studies; 3274 women and 6548 fetuses/infants). Among twin gestations with a transvaginal sonographic cervical length <30 mm (6 studies; 306 women and 612 fetuses/infants), vaginal progesterone was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of preterm birth occurring at <28 to <32 gestational weeks (relative risks, 0.48–0.65; moderate- to high-quality evidence), neonatal death (relative risk, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.11–0.92; moderate-quality evidence), and birthweight <1500 g (relative risk, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.39–0.88; high-quality evidence). Vaginal progesterone significantly reduced the risk of preterm birth occurring at <28 to <34 gestational weeks (relative risks, 0.41–0.68), composite neonatal morbidity and mortality (relative risk, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.98), and birthweight <1500 g (relative risk, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.94) in twin gestations with a transvaginal sonographic cervical length ≤25 mm (6 studies; 95 women and 190 fetuses/infants). The quality of evidence was moderate for all these outcomes.

Conclusion

Vaginal progesterone does not prevent preterm birth, nor does it improve perinatal outcomes in unselected twin gestations, but it appears to reduce the risk of preterm birth occurring at early gestational ages and of neonatal morbidity and mortality in twin gestations with a sonographic short cervix. However, more evidence is needed before recommending this intervention to this subset of patients.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
67完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
SciGPT应助乐观的莫茗采纳,获得10
刚刚
yxdjzwx完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
月明一完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
乐观夏岚完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
刻苦傲安完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
芒果不忙完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
风未见的曾经完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
斯文败类应助shenqi采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
徐伟康完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
67发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
LOONG完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
科研通AI2S应助yxdjzwx采纳,获得10
6秒前
筱诸雄完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
阿金完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Backto1998发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
共享精神应助HM采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
恒温失效发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
韋晴完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
西柚完成签到,获得积分0
11秒前
无赖真菌完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
红萌馆管家完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
单纯的又菱完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
重要的小丸子完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
圈圈完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
14秒前
听雨眠完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Backto1998完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
高大从丹完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
16秒前
深山小石完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
高分求助中
Ophthalmic Equipment Market by Devices(surgical: vitreorentinal,IOLs,OVDs,contact lens,RGP lens,backflush,diagnostic&monitoring:OCT,actorefractor,keratometer,tonometer,ophthalmoscpe,OVD), End User,Buying Criteria-Global Forecast to2029 2000
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind (Sixth Edition) 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 588
Christian Women in Chinese Society: The Anglican Story 500
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3961294
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3507579
关于积分的说明 11136907
捐赠科研通 3240039
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1790707
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 872450
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 803255