Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin gestations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 产科 相对风险 妊娠期 置信区间 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 早产 安慰剂 怀孕 妇科 内科学 遗传学 生物 病理 替代医学
作者
Agustín Conde‐Agudelo,Roberto Romero,Anoop Rehal,Maria de Lourdes Brizot,Vicente Serra,Eduardo Da Fonseca,Elçin Çetingöz,Argyro Syngelaki,Alfredo Perales,Sonia S. Hassan,K. H. Nicolaides
出处
期刊:American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [Elsevier]
卷期号:229 (6): 599-616.e3 被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.05.010
摘要

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin gestations.

Data Sources

MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, and CINAHL (from their inception to January 31, 2023), Cochrane databases, Google Scholar, bibliographies, and conference proceedings.

Study Eligibility Criteria

Randomized controlled trials that compared vaginal progesterone to placebo or no treatment in asymptomatic women with a twin gestation.

Methods

The systematic review was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The primary outcome was preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes included adverse perinatal outcomes. Pooled relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. We assessed the risk of bias in each included study, heterogeneity, publication bias, and quality of evidence, and performed subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

Results

Eleven studies (3401 women and 6802 fetuses/infants) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among all twin gestations, there were no significant differences between the vaginal progesterone and placebo or no treatment groups in the risk of preterm birth <34 weeks (relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.84–1.17; high-quality evidence), <37 weeks (relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.92–1.06; high-quality evidence), and <28 weeks (relative risk, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.64–1.55; moderate-quality evidence), and spontaneous preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation (relative risk, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.80–1.18; high-quality evidence). Vaginal progesterone had no significant effect on any of the perinatal outcomes evaluated. Subgroup analyses showed that there was no evidence of a different effect of vaginal progesterone on preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation related to chorionicity, type of conception, history of spontaneous preterm birth, daily dose of vaginal progesterone, and gestational age at initiation of treatment. The frequencies of preterm birth <37, <34, <32, <30, and <28 weeks of gestation and adverse perinatal outcomes did not significantly differ between the vaginal progesterone and placebo or no treatment groups in unselected twin gestations (8 studies; 3274 women and 6548 fetuses/infants). Among twin gestations with a transvaginal sonographic cervical length <30 mm (6 studies; 306 women and 612 fetuses/infants), vaginal progesterone was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of preterm birth occurring at <28 to <32 gestational weeks (relative risks, 0.48–0.65; moderate- to high-quality evidence), neonatal death (relative risk, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.11–0.92; moderate-quality evidence), and birthweight <1500 g (relative risk, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.39–0.88; high-quality evidence). Vaginal progesterone significantly reduced the risk of preterm birth occurring at <28 to <34 gestational weeks (relative risks, 0.41–0.68), composite neonatal morbidity and mortality (relative risk, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.98), and birthweight <1500 g (relative risk, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.94) in twin gestations with a transvaginal sonographic cervical length ≤25 mm (6 studies; 95 women and 190 fetuses/infants). The quality of evidence was moderate for all these outcomes.

Conclusion

Vaginal progesterone does not prevent preterm birth, nor does it improve perinatal outcomes in unselected twin gestations, but it appears to reduce the risk of preterm birth occurring at early gestational ages and of neonatal morbidity and mortality in twin gestations with a sonographic short cervix. However, more evidence is needed before recommending this intervention to this subset of patients.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
Criminology34应助JJ索采纳,获得10
2秒前
安详发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
李健的小迷弟应助Ruby采纳,获得10
3秒前
Momomo应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
小二郎应助XIAOWANG采纳,获得10
4秒前
小郭子应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
小郭子应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
hotongue完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
dudu应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
wy.he应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
wy.he应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
蒹葭苍苍应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
小郭子应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
小郭子应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
思源应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
思源应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
蒹葭苍苍应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
蒹葭苍苍应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
科目三应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
4秒前
科目三应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
4秒前
dudu应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Ägyptische Geschichte der 21.–30. Dynastie 2500
Human Embryology and Developmental Biology 7th Edition 2000
The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology 12th Edition 2000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5742086
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5405647
关于积分的说明 15343886
捐赠科研通 4883555
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2625085
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1573951
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1530896