作者
Zixuan Wu,Chi Fang,Yi Hu,Xin Peng,Zheyuan Zhang,Xiaolei Yao,Qinghua Peng
摘要
Background Nonspecific orbital inflammation (NSOI) represents a perplexing and persistent proliferative inflammatory disorder of idiopathic nature, characterized by a heterogeneous lymphoid infiltration within the orbital region. This condition, marked by the aberrant metabolic activities of its cellular constituents, starkly contrasts with the metabolic equilibrium found in healthy cells. Among the myriad pathways integral to cellular metabolism, purine metabolism emerges as a critical player, providing the building blocks for nucleic acid synthesis, such as DNA and RNA. Despite its significance, the contribution of Purine Metabolism Genes (PMGs) to the pathophysiological landscape of NSOI remains a mystery, highlighting a critical gap in our understanding of the disease’s molecular underpinnings. Methods To bridge this knowledge gap, our study embarked on an exploratory journey to identify and validate PMGs implicated in NSOI, employing a comprehensive bioinformatics strategy. By intersecting differential gene expression analyses with a curated list of 92 known PMGs, we aimed to pinpoint those with potential roles in NSOI. Advanced methodologies, including Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA), facilitated a deep dive into the biological functions and pathways associated with these PMGs. Further refinement through Lasso regression and Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE) enabled the identification of key hub genes and the evaluation of their diagnostic prowess for NSOI. Additionally, the relationship between these hub PMGs and relevant clinical parameters was thoroughly investigated. To corroborate our findings, we analyzed expression data from datasets GSE58331 and GSE105149, focusing on the seven PMGs identified as potentially crucial to NSOI pathology. Results Our investigation unveiled seven PMGs (ENTPD1, POLR2K, NPR2, PDE6D, PDE6H, PDE4B, and ALLC) as intimately connected to NSOI. Functional analyses shed light on their involvement in processes such as peroxisome targeting sequence binding, seminiferous tubule development, and ciliary transition zone organization. Importantly, the diagnostic capabilities of these PMGs demonstrated promising efficacy in distinguishing NSOI from non-affected states. Conclusions Through rigorous bioinformatics analyses, this study unveils seven PMGs as novel biomarker candidates for NSOI, elucidating their potential roles in the disease’s pathogenesis. These discoveries not only enhance our understanding of NSOI at the molecular level but also pave the way for innovative approaches to monitor and study its progression, offering a beacon of hope for individuals afflicted by this enigmatic condition.