辩证法
认识论
关系(数据库)
衔接(社会学)
首都(建筑)
论证(复杂分析)
口译(哲学)
马克思主义哲学
对象(语法)
社会学
功能(生物学)
实证经济学
新古典经济学
法学
哲学
历史
经济
政治学
计算机科学
语言学
政治
生物化学
化学
考古
数据库
进化生物学
生物
出处
期刊:Capital & Class
[SAGE Publishing]
日期:2023-01-11
卷期号:48 (1): 75-93
被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1177/03098168221145853
摘要
This article investigates Marx’s method in the analysis of the circuits of capital, as it is carried out in Capital vol. 2, in an attempt to clarify some key aspects of the well-known problem in Marxist literature on the relation between the logical and the historical. The central question on this topic is whether Marx’s analysis is logical/structural or historical. The approach elaborated upon in this article extends beyond the one-sidedness of both views which deny any kind of correlation between logical and historical sequences and the views claiming that the articulation of Capital’s argument exposes a set of historical stages. We will argue that dialectic, namely, the method of ascent from the abstract to the concrete, represents, first and foremost, the inner articulation of the structure of a given self-developing object, and at the same time implicitly represents its historical development. Hence, taking Marx’s analysis of the circuits of capital as a case study, this article aspires to identify the fundamental movement of the systematic dialectic, which characterizes the entire Capital and explains the fundamental function of the relation between the logical and the historical.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI