Circulating biomarkers in acute aortic dissection versus acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review

主动脉夹层 医学 心肌梗塞 心脏病学 内科学 主动脉
作者
Maria L. GALHANO,Filipa Jácome,Jennifer Huynh,Marina Dias‐Neto
出处
期刊:Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery [Edizioni Minerva Medica]
标识
DOI:10.23736/s0021-9509.24.13062-5
摘要

INTRODUCTION: This systematic review aimed to discuss the current knowledge of possibly useful circulatory biomarkers (other than D-dimers) in the diagnosis of patients with an acute aortic dissection (AAD), to distinguish these patients from patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI).EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: This study followed the PRISMA guidelines. The databases PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus were systematically searched from inception to May 2023. Studies were included if they presented measurements of biomarker(s) in the blood/plasma/serum samples from adult patients with AAD versus AMI. Articles were excluded if aortic dissection was subacute or chronic (>14 days), if they lack a control group (AMI), or if they were animal studies, revisions, or editorials. The main outcome was the identification of biomarkers that exhibited diagnostic potential to differentiate patients with AAD versus AMI.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The research query resulted in 1342 articles after the removal of duplicates, from which seven were included in the systematic review. The biomarkers identified included general blood assessment, metabolomics, products of the degradation of fibrin, extracellular matrix markers and an ischemia-associated molecule. Most studies lack diagnostic validity such as sensitivity and specificity. In six studies, the concentration of a total of six biomarkers showed significative differences between AAD and AMI group.CONCLUSIONS: A great heterogeneity of molecules has been studied as putative diagnostic markers of AAD versus AMI. Studies of better quality are needed, presenting the diagnostic validity of the molecules under analysis and the putative synergic diagnostic value of the molecules identified so far.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
cfghjj完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
Kay76发布了新的文献求助30
刚刚
huohuo发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
wanci应助charm12采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
虞天睿天下第一完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
万能图书馆应助XS123采纳,获得10
1秒前
柠檬完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
郗关塚发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
wWw发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
hume完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
感动初柔完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
娇气的笑蓝完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
大个应助会飞的史迪奇采纳,获得10
4秒前
罗丹丹发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Wenhao Zhao发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
斯文败类应助乐观的盼海采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
烟雨1发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Pu Chunyi完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
依然发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
lhh完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
柠檬发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
lcylc发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
科研虫发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
淳于汲发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
完美世界应助jzd1991采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
Wenhao Zhao完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
shijiu完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
勤奋草莓完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
wuhen完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
雷帝3关注了科研通微信公众号
14秒前
高分求助中
The ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication 2500
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2000
Pharmacogenomics: Applications to Patient Care, Third Edition 1000
Studien zur Ideengeschichte der Gesetzgebung 1000
TM 5-855-1(Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons) 1000
Threaded Harmony: A Sustainable Approach to Fashion 810
Genera Insectorum: Mantodea, Fam. Mantidæ, Subfam. Hymenopodinæ (Classic Reprint) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3083043
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2736283
关于积分的说明 7540658
捐赠科研通 2385697
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1265066
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 612909
版权声明 597702