One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
lly2021发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
聪慧的鹤轩完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
情怀应助taimeili采纳,获得10
2秒前
DingShicong完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
4秒前
4秒前
胖丹发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
zz完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
zwjy完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
所所应助聪慧的鹤轩采纳,获得10
7秒前
Cher1she发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
我是老大应助专一的易巧采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
12秒前
范白白完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
lly2021完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
胖丹完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
天天快乐应助轩辕冰夏采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
欢檬应助和谐的阁采纳,获得50
19秒前
陈麦子发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
Cher1she完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
庾稀发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
斯文败类应助小次之山采纳,获得10
23秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助pdx666采纳,获得10
24秒前
完美世界应助祎橘采纳,获得10
25秒前
诗梦完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
大模型应助善良的冥茗采纳,获得10
26秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助Pikno123采纳,获得10
27秒前
29秒前
29秒前
Rondab应助科研达人采纳,获得10
29秒前
陈麦子完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
高分求助中
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 370
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der linguistischen Forschung 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3993004
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3533831
关于积分的说明 11263946
捐赠科研通 3273597
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1806129
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 882968
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 809629