One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
BZD完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
xiaobai123456发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
3秒前
晨宸完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
瑞瑞发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
代总完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
百事可乐完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
大芳发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
情怀应助TAA66采纳,获得10
6秒前
Xu_W卜发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
星辰迷殇发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
二月why发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Carmen完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
鱼丸发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
小二郎应助ron采纳,获得10
11秒前
星辰大海应助上上谦采纳,获得10
11秒前
淡定的汉堡完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
优雅的魂幽完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Too泡泡发布了新的文献求助20
13秒前
13秒前
在雨里思考完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
胡妍发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
科研通AI6.3应助瑞瑞采纳,获得10
17秒前
安诺发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
鱼儿发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
烟花应助鱼丸采纳,获得30
18秒前
8R60d8应助MAK采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6040035
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7774222
关于积分的说明 16229380
捐赠科研通 5186224
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2775269
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1758227
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1642062