已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI6.4应助友好从安采纳,获得10
刚刚
流砂完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
5秒前
DKJ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
KIORking发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
DKJ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
CipherSage应助柏柳采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
11秒前
比儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
积极的誉完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
黄海峰完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
ypqisgood发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
ypqisgood完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
小张同学完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
丘比特应助Nefelibate采纳,获得10
27秒前
怡然的曼文完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
ponta发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
30秒前
嘟嘟完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
严xixi完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
KIORking完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
35秒前
yoqalux发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
36秒前
茶多酚完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
机智友灵完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
Nefelibate发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
绫小路完成签到 ,获得积分10
42秒前
43秒前
一丁雨完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
YCW完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
666666666666666完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
viktornguyen完成签到,获得积分10
46秒前
高分求助中
Invited Discussant 63O and 64O 1000
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 750
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 500
A Handbook of User Experience Research & Design in Libraries 400
Understanding Modeling and Simulation of Polymerization Reactions 400
Direct and Iterative Linear System Solvers 400
《KNN基无铅压电陶瓷电学性能优化与物理机理研究》 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6907845
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8600937
关于积分的说明 18256689
捐赠科研通 6313344
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3065000
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2088789
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2042575