One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
往昔北人发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
花花发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
松月完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
科目三应助YYJ25采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
野原白完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
yh北风完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
桐桐应助乎乎采纳,获得10
5秒前
黄锐完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
看了星星完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
无极微光应助忧郁寒荷采纳,获得20
5秒前
5秒前
BANG发布了新的文献求助20
5秒前
6秒前
lzz完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
Renly发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
謓言完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
烟花应助sxqt采纳,获得10
7秒前
打打应助诗谙采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
裴承昊发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
qx发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
wjw完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
阿伟发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
乐观蚂蚁完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
往昔北人完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
深情安青应助追寻映容采纳,获得10
10秒前
杨涵发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
wang发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Jian发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
yixuan发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
日月完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Inorganic Chemistry Eighth Edition 1200
Free parameter models in liquid scintillation counting 1000
Anionic polymerization of acenaphthylene: identification of impurity species formed as by-products 1000
Standards for Molecular Testing for Red Cell, Platelet, and Neutrophil Antigens, 7th edition 1000
HANDBOOK OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 106th edition 1000
ASPEN Adult Nutrition Support Core Curriculum, Fourth Edition 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6310995
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8127316
关于积分的说明 17029804
捐赠科研通 5368521
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2850463
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1828062
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1680654