One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
张包包发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
在水一方应助11111采纳,获得10
1秒前
雪白代萱发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
科研通AI6.4应助冰与火采纳,获得10
2秒前
无辜吐司发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
小李子完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
Sand发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
YM完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
chenzy完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
王王牛奶发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
pockemon完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
化雪彼岸发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
shuang0116发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
遢霧发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
orixero应助追寻安柏采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
在水一方应助maopp采纳,获得10
8秒前
完美世界应助药学小团子采纳,获得10
8秒前
小马甲应助王王牛奶采纳,获得10
8秒前
无奈的易槐完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
执着凌青发布了新的文献求助100
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
烟花应助meimei采纳,获得10
10秒前
星辰大海应助MOFS采纳,获得10
10秒前
明亮音响完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
111完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
哭泣的雪巧完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
深情安青应助小趴菜采纳,获得10
12秒前
甜滋滋发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
ff发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
平淡以冬完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Picture this! Including first nations fiction picture books in school library collections 2000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1500
Cowries - A Guide to the Gastropod Family Cypraeidae 1200
Quality by Design - An Indispensable Approach to Accelerate Biopharmaceutical Product Development 800
Pulse width control of a 3-phase inverter with non sinusoidal phase voltages 777
ON THE THEORY OF BIRATIONAL BLOWING-UP 666
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6392215
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8207692
关于积分的说明 17373765
捐赠科研通 5445670
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2879139
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1855586
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1698592