One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
行者风完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
4秒前
能帮就帮应助bigpluto采纳,获得10
4秒前
喜看财经发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
冷傲之玉发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
多情的忆山完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
fyjlfy发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
丘比特应助恣肆不羁采纳,获得30
7秒前
9秒前
10秒前
俊逸如风发布了新的文献求助100
10秒前
10秒前
研友_8QyXr8完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
机器猫nzy发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
发SCI的奥德彪完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Jasper应助爱笑的静丹采纳,获得30
13秒前
芫荽关注了科研通微信公众号
14秒前
14秒前
蜜果羹完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
呵呵完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
小马发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
19秒前
韬韬发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
jsk发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
动听易槐发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
冷傲之玉完成签到,获得积分20
24秒前
万能图书馆应助大爷采纳,获得10
25秒前
27秒前
迟迟完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
xiaobao完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
run发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
健康平安快乐的烤红薯完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
在水一方应助专注的安青采纳,获得30
42秒前
李健应助泡泡采纳,获得10
42秒前
42秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 5000
Evidence Summary. Injection (subcutaneous):op- timal administration 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
Curating Socialism: A Handbook of International Art Exhibitions 1947-1989 530
Influence of Inclusion Size on Fatigue Strength and Stress Assessment for Forged Crankshaft under Multiaxial loading 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7487603
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9079595
关于积分的说明 19364193
捐赠科研通 7101691
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3248622
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2417958
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2234008