亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
8秒前
12秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
科目三应助周亚平采纳,获得10
14秒前
19秒前
25秒前
傲娇的从灵完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
123123发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
酷酷乐双完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
31秒前
周亚平发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
45秒前
50秒前
野性的苗条完成签到,获得积分10
51秒前
1分钟前
打打应助zjx采纳,获得10
1分钟前
鲜艳的乐珍完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
2分钟前
无语的新之完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
醉熏的孤云完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
体贴太英发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
体贴太英完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
脑洞疼应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
复杂芷文完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
星辰大海应助无言采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
高兴的曼冬完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
Bismarck完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
酷炫安雁完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
黄jw完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
Shafey发布了新的文献求助30
3分钟前
3分钟前
FashionBoy应助Linson采纳,获得10
3分钟前
冷傲的忆安完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
A Case Study on Hotels as Noncongregate Emergency Living Accommodations for Returning Citizens 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7754374
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9300981
关于积分的说明 20259849
捐赠科研通 7336800
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3310808
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2461994
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2324032