清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
自信的高山完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
风趣的冬卉完成签到 ,获得积分0
27秒前
天山客完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
ch完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
44秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
47秒前
ch发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
成就小蜜蜂完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
LeoBigman完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
调皮醉波完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
aa关闭了aa文献求助
2分钟前
那咋办嘛完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
寡核苷酸小白完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
ikouyo完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
aa发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
酷酷海豚完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
xiang完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
5分钟前
DAVID应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5分钟前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5分钟前
英姑应助悦耳的柠檬采纳,获得10
5分钟前
凌宏完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
披着羊皮的狼完成签到 ,获得积分0
6分钟前
斯文败类应助悦耳的柠檬采纳,获得10
6分钟前
amy完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
zzhui完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7分钟前
7分钟前
7分钟前
7分钟前
小林完成签到 ,获得积分10
8分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
8分钟前
温柔冰岚完成签到 ,获得积分10
8分钟前
8分钟前
脑洞疼应助ceeray23采纳,获得20
8分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Burger's Medicinal Chemistry, Drug Discovery and Development, Volumes 1 - 8, 8 Volume Set, 8th Edition 1800
Cronologia da história de Macau 1600
Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (3rd Edition) 1000
International Arbitration Law and Practice 1000
文献PREDICTION EQUATIONS FOR SHIPS' TURNING CIRCLES或期刊Transactions of the North East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders第95卷 1000
BRITTLE FRACTURE IN WELDED SHIPS 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 细胞生物学 基因 电极 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6158831
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7986865
关于积分的说明 16598255
捐赠科研通 5267531
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2810682
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1790839
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1657989