One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 哲学 认识论 语言学 社会学 政治学 法学 经济 经济增长
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
俞渝发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
小程同学发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
李凤凤发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
5秒前
7秒前
ding应助俞渝采纳,获得10
8秒前
创新发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
小s完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
温柔孤兰发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
Who发布了新的文献求助30
15秒前
cjjwei完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
19秒前
灰灰完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
22秒前
Terahertz完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
苹果丑应助LL采纳,获得10
22秒前
灰灰发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
23秒前
hhhhhhhhhhh发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
26秒前
29秒前
落地满霜完成签到,获得积分20
29秒前
玛卡巴卡完成签到,获得积分20
33秒前
任性半凡发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
丘比特应助Renly采纳,获得10
34秒前
半岛完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
温柔孤兰发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
salty完成签到 ,获得积分10
39秒前
40秒前
hhhhhhhhhhh完成签到,获得积分20
40秒前
SciGPT应助历史真相采纳,获得10
42秒前
yanjiusheng完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
48秒前
50秒前
binz完成签到,获得积分10
51秒前
绿色的大嘴鸟完成签到 ,获得积分10
53秒前
高分求助中
The late Devonian Standard Conodont Zonation 2000
Nickel superalloy market size, share, growth, trends, and forecast 2023-2030 2000
The Lali Section: An Excellent Reference Section for Upper - Devonian in South China 1500
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 870
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 800
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 800
Fundamentals of Dispersed Multiphase Flows 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3254158
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2896509
关于积分的说明 8292828
捐赠科研通 2565380
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1392986
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 652418
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 629856