One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
qqqxl完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
Albert发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
orixero应助LX采纳,获得10
刚刚
zmjmj完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
Bluestar发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
云飞扬完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
Bluestar发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
Bluestar发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
Bluestar发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
zmjmj发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
谢超发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
6秒前
星辰大海应助葫芦采纳,获得10
6秒前
刘小小123完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
大方雁露完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
Bluestar发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Bluestar发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
chenhouhan发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
顾矜应助Huang采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
cy32522发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
10秒前
大模型应助chenhouhan采纳,获得10
11秒前
传奇3应助伍六qi采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
Siri应助大方雁露采纳,获得10
12秒前
Nole应助爆米花采纳,获得10
12秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 1500
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
Curating Socialism: A Handbook of International Art Exhibitions 1947-1989 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7511175
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9099748
关于积分的说明 19421836
捐赠科研通 7117992
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3253001
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2421855
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2239379