One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
负责真发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
2秒前
TDW发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
Wayne完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
丰富硬币发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
莉子完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
留溪月完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Thriving完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
小二郎应助罗昱昕采纳,获得10
11秒前
大模型应助Lucas采纳,获得30
11秒前
丹霞发布了新的文献求助20
11秒前
nonoke完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
Wayne发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
13秒前
黎黎发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
可爱的函函应助孙娟丽采纳,获得10
15秒前
Wenzel发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
郭峰发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
tiptip完成签到,获得积分0
19秒前
20秒前
21秒前
热情的觅云完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
852应助nobeliumer采纳,获得20
24秒前
maliwen完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
英俊的铭应助wuliangliang1211采纳,获得10
25秒前
皮皮发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
蕨蕨发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
26秒前
horizon应助无奈的大聪明采纳,获得10
27秒前
大知闲闲应助郭峰采纳,获得10
30秒前
科目三应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
30秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
30秒前
v0id应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
31秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
31秒前
AOHAYOO发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
31秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 2000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7554392
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9136926
关于积分的说明 19528202
捐赠科研通 7145627
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3260862
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2427310
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2249855