One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Owen应助liangjinan采纳,获得10
2秒前
Tree完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
科yt完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
勤奋海燕发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
甜甜的紫菜完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
Amber发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
温暖的鸿发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
丘比特应助aa采纳,获得10
11秒前
怪僻完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
李爱国应助Ade采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
于归故城完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
19秒前
沉默香旋完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
zhuoai完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
万能图书馆应助哈哈哈采纳,获得10
23秒前
24秒前
25秒前
25秒前
黑咖喱完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
看啥啥会完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
暴走发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
26秒前
27秒前
无极微光应助能闭嘴吗采纳,获得20
28秒前
29秒前
Ava应助Wry采纳,获得10
30秒前
周同庆发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
32秒前
32秒前
erhuayazi发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
ttfakira完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
33秒前
甜甜纸飞机完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
wang完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
PowerCascade: A Synthetic Dataset for Cascading Failure Analysis in Power Systems 2000
Various Faces of Animal Metaphor in English and Polish 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Photodetectors: From Ultraviolet to Infrared 500
On the Dragon Seas, a sailor's adventures in the far east 500
Yangtze Reminiscences. Some Notes And Recollections Of Service With The China Navigation Company Ltd., 1925-1939 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6353737
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8168826
关于积分的说明 17194719
捐赠科研通 5409956
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2863864
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1841268
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1689925