One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
汉堡包应助暮叆采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
维尼发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
yousheng完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
墨明棋妙完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
AX完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
辰辰发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
12完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
belssingoo发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
我了发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
21完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
wwrjj发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
一曲红绡发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
昏睡的蟠桃应助夜夜采纳,获得20
5秒前
谨慎鞅完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
领导范儿应助yayazhang采纳,获得10
6秒前
XY发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
TogawaSakiko发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
uss完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
笑点低向雁完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
我是老大应助慈祥的惜梦采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
韶华完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
相宜发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
WH完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
暮叆发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
爱学习的费力气完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
CipherSage应助周航采纳,获得30
15秒前
16秒前
星辰大海应助momo采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
19秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 2000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Curating Socialism: A Handbook of International Art Exhibitions 1947-1989 750
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7531963
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9117433
关于积分的说明 19475565
捐赠科研通 7132096
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3256518
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2424171
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2244232