已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
轻松的寒松完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
5秒前
汉堡包应助黄智清采纳,获得10
6秒前
CodeCraft应助称心问萍采纳,获得10
7秒前
英俊的铭应助忐忑的源智采纳,获得10
7秒前
9秒前
Scorpia112完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
13秒前
14秒前
中中发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
务实曼冬完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
科研通AI6.3应助lxh98采纳,获得10
19秒前
黄智清发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
linger发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
小瓶纸完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
CAPCAP完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
24秒前
fkdkdls发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
skdfz168完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
核桃完成签到,获得积分0
27秒前
奋斗易真应助小孙采纳,获得10
27秒前
乔治韦斯莱完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
杰尼龟完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
crown完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
月半发布了新的文献求助30
31秒前
33秒前
33秒前
昊昊完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
黄淮科研小白龙完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
111发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
欢喜的巧荷完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
41秒前
43秒前
早123完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
科研通AI6.2应助小王子采纳,获得10
49秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Arthritis and Related Conditions, An Issue of Orthopedic Clinics 1000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
ズームレンズの光学設計に関する研究 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7289251
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8908837
关于积分的说明 18855884
捐赠科研通 6957581
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3209034
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2378761
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2184782