One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
花花2024完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
科研爱好者完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
快乐的素完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
ycd完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Rqbnicsp完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
aikeyan完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
ypres完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
27秒前
无幻完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
风信子完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
32秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
LIJIngcan完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
Connie发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
LIJIngcan关注了科研通微信公众号
41秒前
玻璃球完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
44秒前
nie完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
Zhao完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
47秒前
47秒前
48秒前
48秒前
橙子发布了新的文献求助30
50秒前
仁爱的谷南完成签到,获得积分10
51秒前
51秒前
52秒前
巫马尔槐发布了新的文献求助10
52秒前
55秒前
JamesPei应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
59秒前
顾矜应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
59秒前
59秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
59秒前
小蘑菇应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
59秒前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
59秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
小白完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
一杯沧海完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
十八完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
马冬梅完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
PowerCascade: A Synthetic Dataset for Cascading Failure Analysis in Power Systems 2000
Various Faces of Animal Metaphor in English and Polish 800
The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry 610
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
On the Dragon Seas, a sailor's adventures in the far east 500
Yangtze Reminiscences. Some Notes And Recollections Of Service With The China Navigation Company Ltd., 1925-1939 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6344975
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8159582
关于积分的说明 17156923
捐赠科研通 5400892
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2860628
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1838504
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1688035