亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
优美香露发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
斯文败类应助优美香露采纳,获得80
7秒前
22秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
23秒前
CodeCraft应助学术悍匪采纳,获得10
46秒前
54秒前
学术悍匪完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
学术悍匪发布了新的文献求助10
59秒前
1分钟前
优美香露发布了新的文献求助80
1分钟前
1分钟前
酷炫翠柏发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
万能图书馆应助tuyfytjt采纳,获得10
1分钟前
小丸子和zz完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
asd1576562308完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
tuyfytjt发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
yhw完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
meow完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助酷炫翠柏采纳,获得30
1分钟前
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
梵莫完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
一二发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
无极微光应助Dyying采纳,获得20
2分钟前
XueXiTong完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
大刘发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
Bin_Liu发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
Orange应助凡华采纳,获得10
2分钟前
yang发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
大刘完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
Thanks完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
上官若男应助欣喜的广山采纳,获得10
3分钟前
duzhi完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd Edition 8000
Comprehensive Methanol Science Production, Applications, and Emerging Technologies 2000
Building Quantum Computers 800
Translanguaging in Action in English-Medium Classrooms: A Resource Book for Teachers 700
二氧化碳加氢催化剂——结构设计与反应机制研究 660
碳中和关键技术丛书--二氧化碳加氢 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5657943
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4814668
关于积分的说明 15080640
捐赠科研通 4816211
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2577199
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1532206
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1490776