亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
脑洞疼应助酷炫灰狼采纳,获得10
2秒前
4秒前
CHENG发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
didididm完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
19秒前
CHENG完成签到,获得积分20
21秒前
酷炫灰狼发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
大个应助酷炫灰狼采纳,获得10
40秒前
开心完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
47秒前
酷炫灰狼完成签到,获得积分10
52秒前
55秒前
59秒前
1分钟前
Wendy发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Wendy完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
西吴完成签到 ,获得积分0
1分钟前
Aaaa完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
无限的书琴完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
前寒武完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
Fsy发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
蛋卷完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
chunlily完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
赘婿应助小脑斧采纳,获得10
4分钟前
Euyil完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
CipherSage应助可乐要开心采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
Sherry完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
耍酷丹云完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
幽默的战斗机完成签到,获得积分20
5分钟前
无与伦比完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
MchemG完成签到,获得积分0
5分钟前
hEbuy发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
赘婿应助任性的一斩采纳,获得10
6分钟前
yys10l完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
烟花应助平淡的半邪采纳,获得10
7分钟前
ohuigi完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 2000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
晋绥日报合订本24册(影印本1986年)【1940年9月–1949年5月】 1000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 1000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6034223
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7737050
关于积分的说明 16205558
捐赠科研通 5180695
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2772585
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1755732
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1640565