One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
dshihb发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
科研通AI2S应助愚者先生采纳,获得10
1秒前
轻轻发布了新的文献求助60
1秒前
李佰科发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
2秒前
小芮完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
刘大大完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
3秒前
英姑应助naiz采纳,获得40
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
舒适小笼包完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Kao应助大小子采纳,获得10
5秒前
实验昏了头完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
科研通AI6.4应助中恐采纳,获得10
7秒前
小笼包发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
合适怜南完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
外向的孤容完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
10秒前
汐儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
这都不是事噢完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
zzzz完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
稗子完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Sunny完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助春风拾雨采纳,获得10
15秒前
摆烂研究牲完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
JamesPei应助缥缈的不评采纳,获得10
16秒前
luoshikun完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
可爱的函函应助Qawsed采纳,获得10
18秒前
杨儿发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
dshihb发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
磕盐耇完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
赵欣蕊完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
molihuakai应助管紫南采纳,获得10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 2500
Roms fliessende Grenzen : Archäologische Landesausstellung Nordrhein-Westfalen 1000
Atlas of Aligner Treatment and Planning A Case-Based Approach 1000
Geist der Kunst und Kultur 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Soil mites of the family Rhagidiidae (Actinedida: Eupodoidea). Morphology, Systematics, Ecology 520
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7425734
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9028784
关于积分的说明 19232976
捐赠科研通 7054352
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3235704
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2399165
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2218285