One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
先睡醒再睡觉关注了科研通微信公众号
刚刚
姜姜完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
Owen应助好运6连采纳,获得10
刚刚
hala安胖胖发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
1秒前
科研通AI6.2应助xuemengyao采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
LEAF完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
kk完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
澄澄发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
结实绝音完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
欢喜念双发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
粒粒完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
爱笑的皮卡丘完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
快乐小行星完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Bigwang发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
111完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
小裴完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
wd完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
停停走走发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Crazylittleape完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
科研通AI6.3应助甜美梦槐采纳,获得10
6秒前
科研菜j发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Tiamo完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
萝卜头发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
科研通AI6.2应助多情一手采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
sunny发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
铁马冰河入梦来完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
xixi完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
华仔应助wx采纳,获得10
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6017229
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7601593
关于积分的说明 16155238
捐赠科研通 5165029
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2764811
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1746022
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1635112