One and the same or different? An empirical comparison of aged care recipient and non-aged care recipient preferences for quality of aged care amongst older Australians

医学 老年学 医疗保健 人口 质量(理念) 尊严 政府(语言学) 老年护理 家庭医学 人口学 环境卫生 政治学 经济 法学 社会学 哲学 认识论 经济增长 语言学
作者
Song Jia,Gang Chen,Jyoti Khadka,Rachel Milte,Julie Ratcliffe
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:353: 117054-117054
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117054
摘要

The Quality of Care Experience Aged Care Consumers (QCE-ACC) is a new preference-based instrument recently adopted by the Australian government nationally as a new quality indicator for aged care. This study employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach to develop an aged care user-specific value set for the QCE-ACC instrument. This is crucial for establishing the relative importance of key QCE-ACC dimensions for informing quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. We further empirically compared the preferences of aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients amongst the older Australian population (65 years and above) for quality of care experience using the QCE-ACC. A total of 201 older people (age 74.2 ± 6.2; 59.7% female) receiving aged care services completed the DCE survey between August and September 2022. The comparison of relative importance indicated some divergence in the preferences between the aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients. Amongst aged care recipients, being treated with "Respect & Dignity" was the most important quality of care experience defining dimension, with "Health & Wellbeing" ranked second and "Skills & Training" (of staff) ranked third. However, within non-aged care recipients, "Skills Training" (of staff) was considered the most important quality of care dimension. Distinction in the QCE-ACC utility weights distributions and mean values were also observed, suggesting that aged care recipients may have different opinions about the quality of aged care compared to those who have not accessed aged care services. The findings shed light on the unique preferences of aged care recipients, indicating that aged care recipients and non-aged care recipients' preferences for quality of aged care are not interchangeable. The value set developed in this study is specifically tailored for assessing the quality of aged care using the QCE-ACC instrument from the perspective of aged care users in Australia.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
传奇3应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
aajhajkahna应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
彭于晏应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
奶油生菜发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
suusu发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
小豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
如初完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
8秒前
科研通AI6.3应助端庄的松采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
泡椒21发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
陈槊诸发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
石先敏发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
科研通AI6.2应助suusu采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
yyyj完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
小后院完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
随风完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
roselau发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
TinTin发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
李爱国应助wgf采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
石翎发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
slyzs应助Iris采纳,获得10
16秒前
岑林完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
科研通AI6.3应助ziran采纳,获得30
17秒前
18秒前
FashionBoy应助负责真采纳,获得10
18秒前
香蕉觅云应助随风采纳,获得10
19秒前
甜蜜夜雪完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
APA handbook of comparative psychology: Basic concepts, methods, neural substrate, and behavior 1000
Health Psychology 1000
全员动态考核,锚定高质量发展:读懂同济大学教师人事改革新政的深层价值 900
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7596766
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9173268
关于积分的说明 19638346
捐赠科研通 7173954
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3268130
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2432770
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2261378