医学
台式压力机
蹲下
模式
力量训练
物理疗法
肌肉肥大
阻力训练
最多一次重复
压腿机
物理医学与康复
内科学
社会科学
社会学
作者
Alejandro Hernández-Belmonte,Alejandro Martínez-Cava,Ángel Buendía-Romero,Francisco Franco-López,Jesús G. Pallarés
出处
期刊:Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2023-08-02
卷期号:55 (12): 2316-2327
标识
DOI:10.1249/mss.0000000000003271
摘要
ABSTRACT Purpose This study aimed to compare the effects of free-weight and machine-based resistance training on strength, hypertrophy, and joint discomfort. Methods Thirty-eight resistance-trained men participated in an 8-wk resistance program allocated into free-weight ( n = 19) or machine-based ( n = 19) groups. Training variables were identical for both modalities, so they only differed in the use of barbells or machines to execute the full squat, bench press, prone bench pull, and shoulder press exercises. The velocity-based method was implemented to accurately adjust the intensity throughout the program. Strength changes were evaluated using eight velocity-monitored loading tests (four exercises × two modalities) and included the relative one-repetition maximum (1RM Rel ), as well as the mean propulsive velocity against low (MPV Low ) and high (MPV High ) loads. Ultrasound-derived cross-sectional area of quadriceps (proximal and distal regions), pectoralis major, and rectus abdominis was measured to examine hypertrophy. Complementarily, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaires were administrated to assess changes in lower- and upper-limb joint discomfort. Outcomes were compared using ANCOVA and percentage of change (∆) statistics. Results Each group significantly ( P < 0.001) increased 1RM Rel , MPV Low , and MPV High for both modalities tested, but especially in the one they trained. When considering together the eight exercises tested, strength changes for both modalities were similar (∆ differences ≤1.8%, P ≥ 0.216). Likewise, the cross-sectional area of all the muscles evaluated was significantly increased by both modalities, with no significant differences between them (∆ difference ≤2.0%, P ≥ 0.208). No between-group differences ( P ≥ 0.144) were found for changes in stiffness, pain, and functional disability levels, which were reduced by both modalities. Conclusions Free-weight and machine-based modalities are similarly effective to promote strength and hypertrophy without increasing joint discomfort.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI