How practitioners say they answer the questions of patients about ultraviolet protection

背景(考古学) 防晒 紫外线辐射 质量(理念) 医学 心理学 医学教育 家庭医学 验光服务 环境卫生 地理 哲学 化学 考古 认识论 放射化学
作者
Mohammad Alobaid,Mei Ying Boon,Stephen J. Dain
出处
期刊:Clinical and Experimental Optometry [Informa]
卷期号:105 (6): 642-648 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1080/08164622.2021.1959265
摘要

Patients should be able to rely on optometrists and optical dispensers to provide evidence-based answers to their questions on eye protection, including against ultraviolet radiation. Surveys indicate that there is public concern about the need for protection against ultraviolet radiation, particularly in sunlight. This investigation aimed to evaluate the quality of information provided by practitioners in response to typical questions to which they might reasonably be expected to have ready answers. A cross-sectional study was conducted of on-site responses from attendees of a 3 day optical fair, in Sydney, Australia, in 2017. Subjects were not forewarned about the study. The portion of the questionnaire reported here comprised open answers to four questions intended to represent typical enquiries of patients. The questions were about recommendations for ultraviolet protection in the context of 1) computer use, 2) outdoor use, 3) driving and 4) under office lighting. Eighty-three participants returned completed questionnaires out of 140 issued (61% response). The open-answer question responses were grouped into appropriate, borderline (mostly appropriate but mixed with non-UVR related recommendations) and others (mostly non-UVR related recommendations) and by job title. The proportion of appropriate answers to the four questions were 20%, 30%, 12% and 15%, respectively, which did not differ by job title. A significantly higher proportion of optical dispensers than optometrists selected 'Don't know/no answer' for all questions except office use. Eyecare professionals need to be educated on eye protection against UV radiation to improve the quality of information to be given to the public.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Yiran完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
11完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
shi0331完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
调皮的代双完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
Jolin完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
NXZ发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
马家辉完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
ABC发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Sept完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
小杭76应助todayisirene采纳,获得10
6秒前
科研通AI6应助彩色的盼秋采纳,获得10
7秒前
三水发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
曾开心发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
英俊的铭应助火苗采纳,获得10
9秒前
远方如歌完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
啦啦啦啦啦完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
奋斗含巧完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
仔仔完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
领导范儿应助史超采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
13秒前
科研通AI6应助hbhbj采纳,获得10
13秒前
ABC完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
三水完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
充电宝应助Daidai采纳,获得50
16秒前
愉快迎南发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
19秒前
xuan发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
szf完成签到,获得积分20
22秒前
22秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.).. Frederic G. Reamer 1070
2025-2031年中国兽用抗生素行业发展深度调研与未来趋势报告 1000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 851
The International Law of the Sea (fourth edition) 800
A Guide to Genetic Counseling, 3rd Edition 500
Synthesis and properties of compounds of the type A (III) B2 (VI) X4 (VI), A (III) B4 (V) X7 (VI), and A3 (III) B4 (V) X9 (VI) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5415277
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4531889
关于积分的说明 14130763
捐赠科研通 4447452
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2439702
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1431793
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1409400