判别效度
结构效度
可靠性(半导体)
心理学
比例(比率)
度量(数据仓库)
同时有效性
标准效度
可视模拟标度
构造(python库)
有效性
测试有效性
表面有效性
词(群论)
认知心理学
心理测量学
发展心理学
计算机科学
物理疗法
数学
医学
数据挖掘
内部一致性
功率(物理)
物理
量子力学
程序设计语言
几何学
作者
James Keck,Janis E. Gerkensmeyer,Betsy A. Joyce,Julia Schade
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0882-5963(96)80081-9
摘要
Reliability and validity of the Faces and Word Descriptor Scales to measure pain in verbal children undergoing painful procedures were assessed. Test-retest reliability and construct and discriminant validity were supported for both instruments among a sample of 118 children in three age groups (3-7, 8-12, 13-18). Construct validity was determined by comparisons with a visual analogue scale and a numerical scale with known validity. A majority of the children preferred to use the Faces scale when providing self-report of pain regardless of age. The Faces and Word Descriptor Scales are valid and reliable instruments to measure procedural pain intensity.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI