Resident Selection Criteria for Advanced Education in Prosthodontic Programs: Program Directors’ Perspective

口腔修复科 医学教育 固定修复术 心理学 诚实 描述性统计 过程(计算) 秩(图论) 医学 项目负责人 家庭医学 计算机科学 牙科 数学 统计 社会心理学 组合数学 操作系统
作者
Judy Chia‐Chun Yuan,Damian J. Lee,Kent L. Knoernschild,Stephen D. Campbell,Cortino Sukotjo
出处
期刊:Journal of Prosthodontics [Wiley]
卷期号:19 (4): 307-314 被引量:19
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1532-849x.2009.00570.x
摘要

The purpose of this study was to describe the criteria used by advanced education in prosthodontic program (AEPP) directors to select their residents, to rank them by perceived importance, and further assist prospective candidates with the application process for AEPP.Questionnaires were distributed to all prosthodontic program directors (N = 46). The program directors were requested to respond in five sections: (1) general information, (2) information obtained from applications and letters of recommendation, (3) interview process, (4) decision process, and (5) retrospective view of the selection process. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Data were collected and compiled into mean, standard deviation, and range. Results were tabulated and ranked.Thirty-eight responses (82.61%) were returned and analyzed. Most of the programs (75.77%) indicated that a combination of the program director, current residents, prosthodontic faculty, and staff members were involved in conducting the interview process. Factors considered very important when choosing applicants to the prosthodontic program were (1) interview process, (2) dental school class rank, (3) dental school grades (prosthodontics), (4) letters of recommendation, (5) dental school grades (clinical). Letters from the prosthodontic post-doc program director and prosthodontic faculty were considered the most important source of recommendation. Honesty, organization, and energy were ranked as the most positive characteristics of the applicants during the interview. Almost all respondents (97%) were satisfied with the current selection process. When asked about the current applicant pool, most program directors (91.67%) were satisfied.The most and least important factors in selecting applicants by the program directors were described and ranked. This study was intended to provide the profession with some insight on how advanced Prosthodontic programs select their applicants. It may also serve as a valuable instrument for prospective applicants to AEPPs in the future.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
迷人雪一发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
乐观的素阴完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
JamesPei应助幽默尔蓝采纳,获得10
3秒前
失眠的火车完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
水蜜桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
爆米花应助东郭雁梅采纳,获得10
4秒前
知然完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
zcl完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
欧阳万仇发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
6秒前
ruirui完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
鹏程发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
HJJHJH发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
元谷雪发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
废人一个完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
123654完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
雪原白鹿完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
Amazing完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
尉迟十八发布了新的文献求助60
14秒前
张小南发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
J_C_Van完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
窦房结完成签到 ,获得积分20
15秒前
15秒前
内向井发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
星辰完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
ccc发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助czz采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
lnan发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
高分求助中
2025-2031全球及中国金刚石触媒粉行业研究及十五五规划分析报告 12000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1000
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 800
Translanguaging in Action in English-Medium Classrooms: A Resource Book for Teachers 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5695511
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5102149
关于积分的说明 15216311
捐赠科研通 4851790
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2602705
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1554389
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1512420