Very Early Versus Delayed Mobilization After Stroke

医学 冲程(发动机) 康复 老年学 图书馆学 家庭医学 物理疗法 机械工程 计算机科学 工程类
作者
Julie Bernhardt,Matthew N.T. Thuy,Janice Collier,Lynn Legg
出处
期刊:Stroke [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:40 (7) 被引量:46
标识
DOI:10.1161/strokeaha.109.549899
摘要

HomeStrokeVol. 40, No. 7Very Early Versus Delayed Mobilization After Stroke Free AccessReview ArticlePDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessReview ArticlePDF/EPUBVery Early Versus Delayed Mobilization After Stroke Julie Bernhardt, PhD, Matthew N.T. Thuy, MBBS, Janice M. Collier, PhD and Lynn A. Legg, MPH Julie BernhardtJulie Bernhardt From the Very Early Rehabilitation Research Program (J.B.), National Stroke Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; the National Stroke Research Institute (M.N.T.T., J.M.C.), Melbourne, Australia; Research Fellow, and the Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine (L.A.L.), University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. , Matthew N.T. ThuyMatthew N.T. Thuy From the Very Early Rehabilitation Research Program (J.B.), National Stroke Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; the National Stroke Research Institute (M.N.T.T., J.M.C.), Melbourne, Australia; Research Fellow, and the Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine (L.A.L.), University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. , Janice M. CollierJanice M. Collier From the Very Early Rehabilitation Research Program (J.B.), National Stroke Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; the National Stroke Research Institute (M.N.T.T., J.M.C.), Melbourne, Australia; Research Fellow, and the Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine (L.A.L.), University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. and Lynn A. LeggLynn A. Legg From the Very Early Rehabilitation Research Program (J.B.), National Stroke Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; the National Stroke Research Institute (M.N.T.T., J.M.C.), Melbourne, Australia; Research Fellow, and the Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine (L.A.L.), University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. Originally published4 Jun 2009https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.549899Stroke. 2009;40:e489–e490Other version(s) of this articleYou are viewing the most recent version of this article. Previous versions: June 4, 2009: Previous Version 1 Care in a stroke unit results in reduced disability and an increased likelihood of returning home after stroke compared with other forms of care. The rehabilitation provided within stroke units is not well defined but is believed to be an important component of care. Very early mobilization (helping patients to get up out of bed within 24 to 48 hours of stroke symptom onset) is performed in some stroke units and is recommended in a number of acute stroke clinical guidelines. It is unclear whether very early mobilization improves outcome after stroke.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials to determine the benefits and harms of very early mobilization compared with conventional care.Search Strategy and Inclusion CriteriaWe searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched April 2008) and 25 databases, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2007), MEDLINE (1950 to August 2007), EMBASE (1980 to September 2007), CINAHL (1982 to December 2006), and AMED (1985 to January 2007). We also searched relevant ongoing trials and research registers (January 2007), the Chinese medical database Wanfangdata (March 2007), handsearched journals, searched reference lists, and contacted researchers in the field.Unconfounded randomized, controlled trials comparing an intervention group that started out-of-bed mobilization within 48 hours of stroke and aimed to reduce time to first mobilization and increase the amount or frequency (or both) of mobilization, with conventional care, were eligible. Studies comparing rehabilitation delivered in different care settings (eg, stroke units versus general medical wards) were excluded.Data CollectionOne reviewer eliminated obviously irrelevant records. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria to remaining studies.OutcomesThe primary outcome of interest was mortality or poor outcome (dependency or institutionalization). Secondary outcomes included activities of daily living, quality of life, time to walking, adverse events, and mood.Main ResultsThirty-nine trials of interest were identified, many of which came from Chinese language journals. There were 3 eligible trials; 2 of these trials are ongoing (Very Early Rehabilitation or Intensive Telemetry After Stroke [VERITAS], A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial [AVERT] III), leaving one eligible randomized, controlled trial (n=71). In this study, the experimental group had both earlier and a higher total dose of mobilization than controls (experimental group median time to mobilization 18.1 hours, total dose 167 minutes; control group median time to mobilization 30.8 hours, total dose 69 minutes). No significant effect for death and dependency was found for very early mobilization (OR 0.67, P=0.42; Figure). Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure. Death and poor outcome at 3 months.Reviewers' Conclusions and Implications for PracticeThere is insufficient evidence to make any recommendation on the practice. We found no evidence to suggest that the practice should be discontinued where very early mobilization is already a well-established part of stroke unit care. However, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that the practice should be adopted more broadly.Implications for ResearchDespite a significant body of potentially relevant research, few studies met inclusion criteria. A major problem identified during our search was that the term "early rehabilitation" was used to define interventions spanning a time interval up to 3 months poststroke. Larger, well-designed studies are needed in this field and the importance of clearly defining both the start time poststroke and the precise nature of the intervention needs to be stressed.Note: The full text of this review is available in the Cochrane Library. The full article should be cited as: Bernhardt J, Thuy MNT, Collier JM, Legg LA. Very early versus delayed mobilization after stroke. The Cochrane Library. 2009; Issue 1.FootnotesCorrespondence to Julie Bernhardt, PhD, National Stroke Research Institute, Level 2, Neurosciences Building, Austin Health, 300 Waterdale Road, Melbourne, Australia 3081. E-mail [email protected] Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Olkowski B, Binning M, Sanfillippo G, Arcaro M, Slotnick L, Veznedaroglu E, Liebman K and Warren A (2015) Early Mobilization in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Accelerates Recovery and Reduces Length of Stay, Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy, 10.1097/JAT.0000000000000008, 6:2, (47-55), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2015. Oczkowski W (2014) Pharmacological therapies to enhance motor recovery and walking after stroke: emerging strategies, Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 10.1586/14737175.2013.814940, 13:8, (903-909), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2013. Formisano R, Azicnuda E, Bivona U, Ciurli M, Gabrielli A and Catani S (2013) Neurorehabilitation Textbook of Neurointensive Care, 10.1007/978-1-4471-5226-2_43, (879-894), . Greifzu F, Schmidt S, Schmidt K, Kreikemeier K, Witte O and Löwel S (2011) Global impairment and therapeutic restoration of visual plasticity mechanisms after a localized cortical stroke, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 10.1073/pnas.1016458108, 108:37, (15450-15455), Online publication date: 13-Sep-2011. Stineman M, Kwong P, Xie D, Kurichi J, Ripley D, Brooks D, Bidelspach D and Bates B (2010) Prognostic Differences for Functional Recovery After Major Lower Limb Amputation: Effects of the Timing and Type of Inpatient Rehabilitation Services in the Veterans Health Administration, PM&R, 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.01.012, 2:4, (232-243), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2010. July 2009Vol 40, Issue 7 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.549899 Manuscript receivedFebruary 8, 2009Manuscript acceptedFebruary 24, 2009Originally publishedJune 4, 2009 Keywordsearly rehabilitationcerebrovascular accidentsystematic reviewexerciseambulationPDF download Advertisement

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
黄超完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
一颗甜柚完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
研友_89NQqL发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
369ninja的应助被111采纳,获得10
3秒前
fsznc完成签到 ,获得积分0
3秒前
所所的应助被cchenn采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
young完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
queky完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
qianduo发布了新的文献求助60
7秒前
7秒前
cchenn完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
小二郎的应助被京阿尼采纳,获得10
9秒前
11秒前
ZSY完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
zheijie完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
tomqas完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
凡之完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
明天很好的应助被缓慢的念之采纳,获得10
13秒前
红烧肉耶完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
melody发布了新的文献求助40
13秒前
Echo完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
隐形曼青的应助被缓慢的念之采纳,获得10
13秒前
15秒前
16秒前
leebai2006发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
Elaine完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
布丁完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
李健的小迷弟的应助被橙子采纳,获得10
19秒前
京阿尼发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
lx的应助被叶嘉桢采纳,获得10
19秒前
springlrt的应助被能干晓啸采纳,获得20
20秒前
cbb发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
卢敏明发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Modern Artificial Intelligence 1000
Das Matthäusevangelium: Kapitel 1:1–17 1000
IRTSD: Open-Source Data and Toolset for Electromagnetic Transient Analysis of Disturbances and IBR Control Malfunctions in Transmission Systems 1000
Transcriptional Profiling Shows that Gcn4p Is a Master Regulator of Gene Expression during Amino Acid Starvation in Yeast 750
Entre Praga y Madrid : los contactos checoslovaco-españoles (1948-1977) 600
A REVIEW OF THE V-22 DYNAMICS VALIDATION PROGRAM 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8125143
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9528544
关于积分的说明 21573472
捐赠科研通 7704746
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3416338
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2542148
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2457333