亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Very Early Versus Delayed Mobilization After Stroke

医学 冲程(发动机) 康复 老年学 图书馆学 家庭医学 物理疗法 机械工程 计算机科学 工程类
作者
Julie Bernhardt,Matthew N.T. Thuy,Janice Collier,Lynn Legg
出处
期刊:Stroke [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:40 (7) 被引量:46
标识
DOI:10.1161/strokeaha.109.549899
摘要

HomeStrokeVol. 40, No. 7Very Early Versus Delayed Mobilization After Stroke Free AccessReview ArticlePDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessReview ArticlePDF/EPUBVery Early Versus Delayed Mobilization After Stroke Julie Bernhardt, PhD, Matthew N.T. Thuy, MBBS, Janice M. Collier, PhD and Lynn A. Legg, MPH Julie BernhardtJulie Bernhardt From the Very Early Rehabilitation Research Program (J.B.), National Stroke Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; the National Stroke Research Institute (M.N.T.T., J.M.C.), Melbourne, Australia; Research Fellow, and the Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine (L.A.L.), University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. , Matthew N.T. ThuyMatthew N.T. Thuy From the Very Early Rehabilitation Research Program (J.B.), National Stroke Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; the National Stroke Research Institute (M.N.T.T., J.M.C.), Melbourne, Australia; Research Fellow, and the Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine (L.A.L.), University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. , Janice M. CollierJanice M. Collier From the Very Early Rehabilitation Research Program (J.B.), National Stroke Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; the National Stroke Research Institute (M.N.T.T., J.M.C.), Melbourne, Australia; Research Fellow, and the Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine (L.A.L.), University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. and Lynn A. LeggLynn A. Legg From the Very Early Rehabilitation Research Program (J.B.), National Stroke Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; the National Stroke Research Institute (M.N.T.T., J.M.C.), Melbourne, Australia; Research Fellow, and the Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine (L.A.L.), University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. Originally published4 Jun 2009https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.549899Stroke. 2009;40:e489–e490Other version(s) of this articleYou are viewing the most recent version of this article. Previous versions: June 4, 2009: Previous Version 1 Care in a stroke unit results in reduced disability and an increased likelihood of returning home after stroke compared with other forms of care. The rehabilitation provided within stroke units is not well defined but is believed to be an important component of care. Very early mobilization (helping patients to get up out of bed within 24 to 48 hours of stroke symptom onset) is performed in some stroke units and is recommended in a number of acute stroke clinical guidelines. It is unclear whether very early mobilization improves outcome after stroke.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials to determine the benefits and harms of very early mobilization compared with conventional care.Search Strategy and Inclusion CriteriaWe searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched April 2008) and 25 databases, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2007), MEDLINE (1950 to August 2007), EMBASE (1980 to September 2007), CINAHL (1982 to December 2006), and AMED (1985 to January 2007). We also searched relevant ongoing trials and research registers (January 2007), the Chinese medical database Wanfangdata (March 2007), handsearched journals, searched reference lists, and contacted researchers in the field.Unconfounded randomized, controlled trials comparing an intervention group that started out-of-bed mobilization within 48 hours of stroke and aimed to reduce time to first mobilization and increase the amount or frequency (or both) of mobilization, with conventional care, were eligible. Studies comparing rehabilitation delivered in different care settings (eg, stroke units versus general medical wards) were excluded.Data CollectionOne reviewer eliminated obviously irrelevant records. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria to remaining studies.OutcomesThe primary outcome of interest was mortality or poor outcome (dependency or institutionalization). Secondary outcomes included activities of daily living, quality of life, time to walking, adverse events, and mood.Main ResultsThirty-nine trials of interest were identified, many of which came from Chinese language journals. There were 3 eligible trials; 2 of these trials are ongoing (Very Early Rehabilitation or Intensive Telemetry After Stroke [VERITAS], A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial [AVERT] III), leaving one eligible randomized, controlled trial (n=71). In this study, the experimental group had both earlier and a higher total dose of mobilization than controls (experimental group median time to mobilization 18.1 hours, total dose 167 minutes; control group median time to mobilization 30.8 hours, total dose 69 minutes). No significant effect for death and dependency was found for very early mobilization (OR 0.67, P=0.42; Figure). Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure. Death and poor outcome at 3 months.Reviewers' Conclusions and Implications for PracticeThere is insufficient evidence to make any recommendation on the practice. We found no evidence to suggest that the practice should be discontinued where very early mobilization is already a well-established part of stroke unit care. However, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that the practice should be adopted more broadly.Implications for ResearchDespite a significant body of potentially relevant research, few studies met inclusion criteria. A major problem identified during our search was that the term "early rehabilitation" was used to define interventions spanning a time interval up to 3 months poststroke. Larger, well-designed studies are needed in this field and the importance of clearly defining both the start time poststroke and the precise nature of the intervention needs to be stressed.Note: The full text of this review is available in the Cochrane Library. The full article should be cited as: Bernhardt J, Thuy MNT, Collier JM, Legg LA. Very early versus delayed mobilization after stroke. The Cochrane Library. 2009; Issue 1.FootnotesCorrespondence to Julie Bernhardt, PhD, National Stroke Research Institute, Level 2, Neurosciences Building, Austin Health, 300 Waterdale Road, Melbourne, Australia 3081. E-mail [email protected] Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Olkowski B, Binning M, Sanfillippo G, Arcaro M, Slotnick L, Veznedaroglu E, Liebman K and Warren A (2015) Early Mobilization in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Accelerates Recovery and Reduces Length of Stay, Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy, 10.1097/JAT.0000000000000008, 6:2, (47-55), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2015. Oczkowski W (2014) Pharmacological therapies to enhance motor recovery and walking after stroke: emerging strategies, Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 10.1586/14737175.2013.814940, 13:8, (903-909), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2013. Formisano R, Azicnuda E, Bivona U, Ciurli M, Gabrielli A and Catani S (2013) Neurorehabilitation Textbook of Neurointensive Care, 10.1007/978-1-4471-5226-2_43, (879-894), . Greifzu F, Schmidt S, Schmidt K, Kreikemeier K, Witte O and Löwel S (2011) Global impairment and therapeutic restoration of visual plasticity mechanisms after a localized cortical stroke, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 10.1073/pnas.1016458108, 108:37, (15450-15455), Online publication date: 13-Sep-2011. Stineman M, Kwong P, Xie D, Kurichi J, Ripley D, Brooks D, Bidelspach D and Bates B (2010) Prognostic Differences for Functional Recovery After Major Lower Limb Amputation: Effects of the Timing and Type of Inpatient Rehabilitation Services in the Veterans Health Administration, PM&R, 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.01.012, 2:4, (232-243), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2010. July 2009Vol 40, Issue 7 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.549899 Manuscript receivedFebruary 8, 2009Manuscript acceptedFebruary 24, 2009Originally publishedJune 4, 2009 Keywordsearly rehabilitationcerebrovascular accidentsystematic reviewexerciseambulationPDF download Advertisement

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
忐忑的方盒完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
嘻嘻哈哈应助彭进水采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Ryan完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
饼干完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
xbb0905发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
xbb0905完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
追风发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
理想家完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
Hello应助追风采纳,获得10
3分钟前
3分钟前
QQQQ发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
QQQQ完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
追风发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
Tree_QD完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
喜悦的小土豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
ding应助追风采纳,获得10
4分钟前
我是老大应助君寻采纳,获得10
5分钟前
失眠呆呆鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
lushanxihai完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
isjj完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
Lucas应助阿七奶呼呼的采纳,获得10
5分钟前
5分钟前
追风发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
光光发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
光光完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
科目三应助追风采纳,获得10
7分钟前
7分钟前
yuyuan发布了新的文献求助10
7分钟前
Francis发布了新的文献求助10
7分钟前
7分钟前
追风发布了新的文献求助10
7分钟前
8分钟前
qc发布了新的文献求助10
8分钟前
所所应助qc采纳,获得10
8分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Lewis’s Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: A Comprehensive Textbook Sixth Edition 2000
Wolffs Headache and Other Head Pain 9th Edition 1000
Continuing Syntax 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
荧光膀胱镜诊治膀胱癌 500
First trimester ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abnormalities 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6223445
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8048730
关于积分的说明 16779460
捐赠科研通 5308143
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2827681
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1805712
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1664844