单链构象多态性
免疫染色
免疫组织化学
卵巢癌
生物
癌症研究
染色
癌症
抗体
突变
分子生物学
病理
医学
内科学
基因
遗传学
作者
Ivo Meinhold‐Heerlein,Elena Ninci,Hans Ikenberg,Thomas Brandstëtter,Christian Ihling,Ildiko Schwenk,Alexander Straub,B. Schmitt,Herta Bettendorf,Richard Iggo,Thomas Bauknecht
出处
期刊:Oncology
[S. Karger AG]
日期:2001-01-01
卷期号:60 (2): 176-188
被引量:33
摘要
The p53 status is increasingly regarded as a marker predictive of response to particular cancer therapies, but for this approach it is self-evident that the p53 status must be determined correctly.We have tested ovarian cancers with single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis (SSCP), immunohistochemical staining with DO-1 anti-p53 antibody (IHC), and yeast p53 functional assay (FASAY).These techniques commonly used to detect p53 mutations showed important differences in their sensitivity. Of 53 tumors tested with three indirect techniques, 27 (50%), 33 (62%) and 41 (77%) were positive by SSCP, IHC, and FASAY, respectively. In a subset of 32 tumors strongly suspected of containing mutations, 25 (78%), 26 (81%), 29 (91%) and 30 (94%) were positive by SSCP, immunostaining, DNA sequencing and yeast assay, respectively.Under comparable routine conditions, the FASAY reached the highest sensitivity. Since no single technique detected all mutations, we recommend the use of at least two different techniques in situations where the p53 status will affect patient management.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI