How Well Do MWL and CEL Preparations Represent the Whole Hardwood Lignin?

Hardwood lignin preparations were isolated using classical milled wood lignin (MWL) and cellulolytic enzyme lignin (CEL) protocols. Furthermore, we managed to produce a lignin preparation of a very high yield, above 90%, with high purity and minimal structural degradation. This was achieved by dissolution and regeneration of milled wood prior to enzymatic hydrolysis, along with the use of 80% dioxane for lignin extraction. This preparation (RCEL-80) yield was about 4.5 and 2.5 times higher than the yields of the traditional MWL and CEL preparations, correspondingly, at the same milling time. The preparations obtained were comprehensively analyzed with state-of-the-art quantitative NMR techniques and wet chemistry methods. CELs were representative preparations for hardwood lignins as the S/G ratios in the CELs were equivalent to those in lignin in situ. Degradation of the main lignin subunits was very low. Importantly, the structures of CELs were independent of the preparation yield and were very similar to the structure of the high-yield lignin, RCEL-80. In contrast, the structures of MWLs were noticeably dependent on the preparation yield, especially when the yield was below 15–20% of total wood lignin. In particular, the S/G ratio increased with increasing MWL yield, but was still lower than the S/G ratios of the whole lignins in situ, even at high MWL yields. The amounts of β-O-4 lignin units in MWL were lower than those in the corresponding CEL preparations. It has been concluded that CEL preparations were representative of the whole wood lignin whereas MWLs represent a fraction with a lower S/G ratio.