荟萃分析
心理信息
可靠性(半导体)
心理学
系统回顾
梅德林
等级间信度
临床心理学
医学
评定量表
发展心理学
功率(物理)
物理
量子力学
政治学
内科学
法学
作者
Lauren Shelley,Chris Jones,Effie Pearson,Caroline Richards,Hayley Crawford,Arianna Paricos,Courtney Greenhill,A.D. Woodhead,Joanne Tarver,Jane Waite
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102434
摘要
Behaviours that challenge (BtC) are common in people with intellectual disability (ID) and associated with negative long-term outcomes. Reliable characterisation of BtC and behavioural function is integral to person-centred interventions. This systematic review and meta-analytic study quantitatively synthesised the evidence-base for the internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability of measures of BtC and behavioural function in people with ID (PROSPERO: CRD42021239042). Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO and MEDLINE were searched from inception to March 2024. Retrieved records (n = 3691) were screened independently to identify studies assessing eligible measurement properties in people with ID. Data extracted from 83 studies, across 29 measures, were synthesised in a series of random-effects meta-analyses. Subgroup analyses assessed the influence of methodological quality and study-level characteristics on pooled estimates. COSMIN criteria were used to evaluate the measurement properties of each measure. Pooled estimates ranged across measures: internal consistency (0.41–0.97), inter-rater reliability (0.29–0.93) and test-retest reliability (0.52–0.98). The quantity and quality of evidence varied substantially across measures; evidence was frequently unavailable or limited to a single study. Based on current evidence, candidate measures with the most evidence for internal consistency and reliability are discussed; however, continued assessment of measurement properties in ID populations is a key priority.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI