医学
慢性荨麻疹
考试(生物学)
皮肤病科
生物
古生物学
作者
Connor Prosty,Sofianne Gabrielli,Pasquale Mulé,Nuzha Noorah,Sharon Baum,Shoshana Greenberger,Luís Felipe Ensina,Xun Zhang,Elena Netchiporouk,Moshe Ben‐Shoshan
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2022.07.037
摘要
ABSTRACT
Background
Few validated tools exist to evaluate chronic urticaria (CU) control in children. While the Urticaria Control Test (UCT) exhibits favourable clinometric properties in adult CU, it is not yet validated in children. Objective
We sought to evaluate the validity of the UCT for the assessment of pediatric CU. Methods
Children presenting with CU were consecutively recruited and completed both the UCT and the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) at study entry. Using the CLDQI as an anchor, we assessed the internal consistency, convergent and known-groups validity, and screening accuracy of the UCT at study entry and at follow-up. Results
A total of 52 children with CU were recruited. The UCT exhibited respectable internal consistency in the evaluation of CU (Cronbach's α=0.73 [95%CI: 0.62, 0.85]). UCT and CDLQI scores strongly correlated (r=-0.74, P<0.01). The UCT distinguished between different strata of disease severities established by the CDLQI (P<0.01). Screening accuracy of the UCT was excellent in the discrimination of poorly controlled CU (area under the curve=0.82). An optimal cut-off of ≤10 was determined for defining poorly controlled CU (sensitivity=95.5%, specificity=63.3%). Data at follow-up were consistent with data at study entry. Subgroup analyses of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) were consistent with overall estimates of validity. Conclusion
The UCT is a valid tool for the assessment of pediatric CU and CSU, as evidenced by the acceptable internal consistency, convergent and known-groups validity, and screening accuracy at multiple time points.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI