伊瓦卡夫托
中止
医学
耐受性
临时的
不利影响
置信区间
中期分析
内科学
囊性纤维化
临床试验
历史
考古
囊性纤维化跨膜传导调节器
作者
Cori Daines,Elizabeth Tullis,Stefano Costa,Rachel W. Linnemann,Marcus Mall,Edward F. McKone,Deepika Polineni,Bradley S. Quon,Felix C. Ringshausen,Steven M. Rowe,Hiran Selvadurai,Jennifer L. Taylor‐Cousar,Nicholas Withers,Neil Ahluwalia,Samuel M. Moskowitz,Valentin Prieto-Centurion,Yaoyuan Vincent Tan,Simon Tian,Tanya G. Weinstock,Fengjuan Xuan,Yaohua Zhang,Bonnie W. Ramsey,Matthias Griese
出处
期刊:The European respiratory journal
[European Respiratory Society]
日期:2023-11-09
卷期号:62 (6): 2202029-2202029
被引量:26
标识
DOI:10.1183/13993003.02029-2022
摘要
Background In two pivotal phase 3 trials, up to 24 weeks of treatment with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) was efficacious and safe in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) ≥12 years of age who have at least one F508del allele. The aim of this study is to assess long-term safety and efficacy of ELX/TEZ/IVA in these patients. Methods In this phase 3, open-label, single-arm extension study, participants with F508del –minimal function (from a 24-week parent study; n=399) or F508del – F508del (from a 4-week parent study; n=107) genotypes receive ELX/TEZ/IVA at the same dose (ELX 200 mg once daily, TEZ 100 mg once daily and IVA 150 mg every 12 h). The primary end-point is safety and tolerability. A prespecified interim analysis was conducted when the last participant reached the Week 144 visit. Results At the Week 144 interim analysis, mean duration of exposure to ELX/TEZ/IVA in the extension study was 151.1 weeks. Exposure-adjusted rates of adverse events (AEs) (586.6 events per 100 participant-years) and serious AEs (22.4 events per 100 participant-years) were lower than in the ELX/TEZ/IVA treatment group in the 24-week parent study (1096.0 and 36.9 events per 100 participant-years, respectively); most participants had AEs classified as mild (16.4% of participants) or moderate (60.3% of participants) in severity. 14 participants (2.8%) had AEs that led to treatment discontinuation. Following initiation of ELX/TEZ/IVA, participants had increases in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) percentage predicted, Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised respiratory domain score and body mass index, and had decreases in sweat chloride concentration and pulmonary exacerbation rates that were maintained over the interim analysis period. The mean annualised rate of change in FEV 1 % pred was +0.07 (95% CI −0.12–0.26) percentage points among the participants. Conclusions ELX/TEZ/IVA was generally safe and well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with the 24-week parent study. Participants had sustained improvements in lung function, respiratory symptoms, CF transmembrane conductance regulator function, pulmonary exacerbation rates and nutritional status. These results support the favourable safety profile and durable, disease-modifying clinical benefits of ELX/TEZ/IVA.