The effect of cervical cerclage on the labor curve

宫颈环扎术 宫颈扩张 产科 医学 怀孕 子宫颈 生物 妊娠期 内科学 遗传学 癌症
作者
Kazuma Onishi,Jim Huang,Tetsuya Kawakita
出处
期刊:American Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:5 (4): 100858-100858 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100858
摘要

BACKGROUND Cervical cerclage is an effective intervention to prevent preterm birth among individuals with a history of cervical insufficiency, individuals with a short cervix and history of preterm birth, or individuals with second-trimester painless dilation. Although cerclage reduces the mechanical stress on the cervix by reinforcing it with sutures, cerclage could also cause scarring of the cervix, which may affect the progress of labor. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the labor curves between individuals who underwent cerclage and those who did not undergo cerclage. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals with singleton term pregnancy, vertex presentation, and vaginal delivery, using the data from the Consortium on Safe Labor. We excluded individuals with fetal anomalies, stillbirth, or abnormal perinatal outcomes, including 5-minute Apgar score of <7, birth injury, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. We modeled the course of cervical dilation using repeated-measures analysis with a polynomial function and generated smoothed labor curves. An interval-censored regression analysis was performed to estimate traverse times (the elapsed time between 2 cervical dilation measures). The traverse times were compared between individuals who underwent cerclage and those who did not undergo cerclage, controlling for induction of labor and parity. RESULTS There were 245 individuals who underwent cerclage and 110,080 individuals who did not undergo cerclage. Individuals who underwent cerclage compared with those who did not undergo cerclage had a similar traverse time from 1 to 6 cm (median, 9.1 vs 10.3 hours; adjusted P=.37) and from 6 to 10 cm (median, 1.5 vs 1.5 hours; adjusted P=.23). Individuals who underwent cerclage compared with those who did not undergo cerclage had a longer traverse time from rupture of membranes to delivery (median, 4.0 vs 3.0 hours; adjusted P<.01). CONCLUSION Cervical cerclage did not affect the overall progress of labor. Cervical cerclage is an effective intervention to prevent preterm birth among individuals with a history of cervical insufficiency, individuals with a short cervix and history of preterm birth, or individuals with second-trimester painless dilation. Although cerclage reduces the mechanical stress on the cervix by reinforcing it with sutures, cerclage could also cause scarring of the cervix, which may affect the progress of labor. This study aimed to compare the labor curves between individuals who underwent cerclage and those who did not undergo cerclage. This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals with singleton term pregnancy, vertex presentation, and vaginal delivery, using the data from the Consortium on Safe Labor. We excluded individuals with fetal anomalies, stillbirth, or abnormal perinatal outcomes, including 5-minute Apgar score of <7, birth injury, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. We modeled the course of cervical dilation using repeated-measures analysis with a polynomial function and generated smoothed labor curves. An interval-censored regression analysis was performed to estimate traverse times (the elapsed time between 2 cervical dilation measures). The traverse times were compared between individuals who underwent cerclage and those who did not undergo cerclage, controlling for induction of labor and parity. There were 245 individuals who underwent cerclage and 110,080 individuals who did not undergo cerclage. Individuals who underwent cerclage compared with those who did not undergo cerclage had a similar traverse time from 1 to 6 cm (median, 9.1 vs 10.3 hours; adjusted P=.37) and from 6 to 10 cm (median, 1.5 vs 1.5 hours; adjusted P=.23). Individuals who underwent cerclage compared with those who did not undergo cerclage had a longer traverse time from rupture of membranes to delivery (median, 4.0 vs 3.0 hours; adjusted P<.01). Cervical cerclage did not affect the overall progress of labor.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
由哎完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
大个应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
动听衬衫应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
CodeCraft应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
lalala应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
ding应助科研通管家采纳,获得150
1秒前
lalala应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
桐桐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
浮游应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
rosy发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
森淼发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
ccnnzzz完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
欢喜大地发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
swallow发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
跳跳熊完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
酷酷的书雁完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
rosy完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Ciel完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
可爱滴小花花完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
13秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
swallow完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
优秀画板完成签到 ,获得积分20
14秒前
123完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
南歌子完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
陈爽er完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
隐形曼青应助entang采纳,获得10
17秒前
赘婿应助jkq采纳,获得10
17秒前
123发布了新的文献求助20
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
FUNDAMENTAL STUDY OF ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS 500
微纳米加工技术及其应用 500
Nanoelectronics and Information Technology: Advanced Electronic Materials and Novel Devices 500
Performance optimization of advanced vapor compression systems working with low-GWP refrigerants using numerical and experimental methods 500
Constitutional and Administrative Law 500
PARLOC2001: The update of loss containment data for offshore pipelines 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5295803
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4445172
关于积分的说明 13835666
捐赠科研通 4329791
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2376755
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1372067
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1337408