The effect of cervical cerclage on the labor curve

宫颈环扎术 宫颈扩张 产科 医学 怀孕 子宫颈 生物 妊娠期 内科学 癌症 遗传学
作者
Kazuma Onishi,Jim Huang,Tetsuya Kawakita
出处
期刊:American Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm [Elsevier]
卷期号:5 (4): 100858-100858 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100858
摘要

BACKGROUND Cervical cerclage is an effective intervention to prevent preterm birth among individuals with a history of cervical insufficiency, individuals with a short cervix and history of preterm birth, or individuals with second-trimester painless dilation. Although cerclage reduces the mechanical stress on the cervix by reinforcing it with sutures, cerclage could also cause scarring of the cervix, which may affect the progress of labor. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the labor curves between individuals who underwent cerclage and those who did not undergo cerclage. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals with singleton term pregnancy, vertex presentation, and vaginal delivery, using the data from the Consortium on Safe Labor. We excluded individuals with fetal anomalies, stillbirth, or abnormal perinatal outcomes, including 5-minute Apgar score of <7, birth injury, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. We modeled the course of cervical dilation using repeated-measures analysis with a polynomial function and generated smoothed labor curves. An interval-censored regression analysis was performed to estimate traverse times (the elapsed time between 2 cervical dilation measures). The traverse times were compared between individuals who underwent cerclage and those who did not undergo cerclage, controlling for induction of labor and parity. RESULTS There were 245 individuals who underwent cerclage and 110,080 individuals who did not undergo cerclage. Individuals who underwent cerclage compared with those who did not undergo cerclage had a similar traverse time from 1 to 6 cm (median, 9.1 vs 10.3 hours; adjusted P=.37) and from 6 to 10 cm (median, 1.5 vs 1.5 hours; adjusted P=.23). Individuals who underwent cerclage compared with those who did not undergo cerclage had a longer traverse time from rupture of membranes to delivery (median, 4.0 vs 3.0 hours; adjusted P<.01). CONCLUSION Cervical cerclage did not affect the overall progress of labor. Cervical cerclage is an effective intervention to prevent preterm birth among individuals with a history of cervical insufficiency, individuals with a short cervix and history of preterm birth, or individuals with second-trimester painless dilation. Although cerclage reduces the mechanical stress on the cervix by reinforcing it with sutures, cerclage could also cause scarring of the cervix, which may affect the progress of labor. This study aimed to compare the labor curves between individuals who underwent cerclage and those who did not undergo cerclage. This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals with singleton term pregnancy, vertex presentation, and vaginal delivery, using the data from the Consortium on Safe Labor. We excluded individuals with fetal anomalies, stillbirth, or abnormal perinatal outcomes, including 5-minute Apgar score of <7, birth injury, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. We modeled the course of cervical dilation using repeated-measures analysis with a polynomial function and generated smoothed labor curves. An interval-censored regression analysis was performed to estimate traverse times (the elapsed time between 2 cervical dilation measures). The traverse times were compared between individuals who underwent cerclage and those who did not undergo cerclage, controlling for induction of labor and parity. There were 245 individuals who underwent cerclage and 110,080 individuals who did not undergo cerclage. Individuals who underwent cerclage compared with those who did not undergo cerclage had a similar traverse time from 1 to 6 cm (median, 9.1 vs 10.3 hours; adjusted P=.37) and from 6 to 10 cm (median, 1.5 vs 1.5 hours; adjusted P=.23). Individuals who underwent cerclage compared with those who did not undergo cerclage had a longer traverse time from rupture of membranes to delivery (median, 4.0 vs 3.0 hours; adjusted P<.01). Cervical cerclage did not affect the overall progress of labor.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Liar应助大胆海瑶采纳,获得20
刚刚
刚刚
Niar完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
远山完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
hui发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
大有阳光发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
顾矜应助大力的新蕾采纳,获得10
2秒前
4秒前
烟花应助犹豫若云采纳,获得20
4秒前
学术竹发布了新的文献求助20
5秒前
SweetyTian发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
8秒前
痴痴的噜完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
千逐发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
了解了l发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
11秒前
情怀应助ZeSheng采纳,获得10
12秒前
Owen应助英俊的小松鼠采纳,获得10
12秒前
zxcvbnm完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
爆米花应助yu_Panda采纳,获得10
12秒前
小白菜完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
潇潇暮雨完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
我可厉害了完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助星光采纳,获得10
15秒前
Hello应助良辰美景采纳,获得10
16秒前
自信的红酒应助嗷嗷嗷采纳,获得10
16秒前
sun完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
anyuanli发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
九点半上课了完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
急求大佬帮助的科研小白完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
JamesPei应助潇洒的涵双采纳,获得30
20秒前
x夏冬雨发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
高分求助中
The late Devonian Standard Conodont Zonation 2000
Nickel superalloy market size, share, growth, trends, and forecast 2023-2030 2000
The Lali Section: An Excellent Reference Section for Upper - Devonian in South China 1500
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 890
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 800
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 800
Fundamentals of Dispersed Multiphase Flows 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3258508
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2900361
关于积分的说明 8309903
捐赠科研通 2569594
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1395833
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 653314
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 631201