The effect of cervical cerclage on the labor curve

宫颈环扎术 宫颈扩张 产科 医学 怀孕 子宫颈 生物 妊娠期 内科学 癌症 遗传学
作者
Kazuma Onishi,Jim Huang,Tetsuya Kawakita
出处
期刊:American Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:5 (4): 100858-100858 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100858
摘要

BACKGROUND Cervical cerclage is an effective intervention to prevent preterm birth among individuals with a history of cervical insufficiency, individuals with a short cervix and history of preterm birth, or individuals with second-trimester painless dilation. Although cerclage reduces the mechanical stress on the cervix by reinforcing it with sutures, cerclage could also cause scarring of the cervix, which may affect the progress of labor. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the labor curves between individuals who underwent cerclage and those who did not undergo cerclage. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals with singleton term pregnancy, vertex presentation, and vaginal delivery, using the data from the Consortium on Safe Labor. We excluded individuals with fetal anomalies, stillbirth, or abnormal perinatal outcomes, including 5-minute Apgar score of <7, birth injury, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. We modeled the course of cervical dilation using repeated-measures analysis with a polynomial function and generated smoothed labor curves. An interval-censored regression analysis was performed to estimate traverse times (the elapsed time between 2 cervical dilation measures). The traverse times were compared between individuals who underwent cerclage and those who did not undergo cerclage, controlling for induction of labor and parity. RESULTS There were 245 individuals who underwent cerclage and 110,080 individuals who did not undergo cerclage. Individuals who underwent cerclage compared with those who did not undergo cerclage had a similar traverse time from 1 to 6 cm (median, 9.1 vs 10.3 hours; adjusted P=.37) and from 6 to 10 cm (median, 1.5 vs 1.5 hours; adjusted P=.23). Individuals who underwent cerclage compared with those who did not undergo cerclage had a longer traverse time from rupture of membranes to delivery (median, 4.0 vs 3.0 hours; adjusted P<.01). CONCLUSION Cervical cerclage did not affect the overall progress of labor. Cervical cerclage is an effective intervention to prevent preterm birth among individuals with a history of cervical insufficiency, individuals with a short cervix and history of preterm birth, or individuals with second-trimester painless dilation. Although cerclage reduces the mechanical stress on the cervix by reinforcing it with sutures, cerclage could also cause scarring of the cervix, which may affect the progress of labor. This study aimed to compare the labor curves between individuals who underwent cerclage and those who did not undergo cerclage. This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals with singleton term pregnancy, vertex presentation, and vaginal delivery, using the data from the Consortium on Safe Labor. We excluded individuals with fetal anomalies, stillbirth, or abnormal perinatal outcomes, including 5-minute Apgar score of <7, birth injury, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. We modeled the course of cervical dilation using repeated-measures analysis with a polynomial function and generated smoothed labor curves. An interval-censored regression analysis was performed to estimate traverse times (the elapsed time between 2 cervical dilation measures). The traverse times were compared between individuals who underwent cerclage and those who did not undergo cerclage, controlling for induction of labor and parity. There were 245 individuals who underwent cerclage and 110,080 individuals who did not undergo cerclage. Individuals who underwent cerclage compared with those who did not undergo cerclage had a similar traverse time from 1 to 6 cm (median, 9.1 vs 10.3 hours; adjusted P=.37) and from 6 to 10 cm (median, 1.5 vs 1.5 hours; adjusted P=.23). Individuals who underwent cerclage compared with those who did not undergo cerclage had a longer traverse time from rupture of membranes to delivery (median, 4.0 vs 3.0 hours; adjusted P<.01). Cervical cerclage did not affect the overall progress of labor.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刘帅完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Niko_Mak完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
xxx完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
haha发布了新的文献求助100
2秒前
与落完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
dh完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
wkbenpao完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
科研民工完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
lllllllll完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
huynx23发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
speedness完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
孙七喜完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
宇宙的中心完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
藜誌发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
影川完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
文献求助完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
TW完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
瑶瑶完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
高兴晓槐完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
w9412完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
愤怒的树叶完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
池鱼完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
zq1992nl完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
一朵海棠花完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
栖琦完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
爱柠完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
林撞树完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
葛彬洁完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
kkk完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
yanchen完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Mezzanine发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
无声瀑布完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
小刀yeye完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
欧凯了家人们完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
啊呜发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Prompt Engineering for Clinicians: Harnessing AI in Everyday Medical Practice 600
University Physics for the Life Sciences 500
REAL-WORLD EFFICACY AND GENOMIC LANDSCAPE OF POLATUZUMA VEDOTIN-BASED FIRST-LINE THERAPY IN DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA: A FOCUS ON TP53 MUTATIONS AND TREATMENT RESPONSE 500
Handbook of Luminescence Dating 500
Safety Pharmacology 500
《KNN基无铅压电陶瓷电学性能优化与物理机理研究》 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6951248
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8635501
关于积分的说明 18310063
捐赠科研通 6393428
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3082001
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2127081
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2058885