The effect of cervical cerclage on the labor curve

宫颈环扎术 宫颈扩张 产科 医学 怀孕 子宫颈 生物 妊娠期 内科学 癌症 遗传学
作者
Kazuma Onishi,Jim Huang,Tetsuya Kawakita
出处
期刊:American Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:5 (4): 100858-100858 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100858
摘要

BACKGROUND Cervical cerclage is an effective intervention to prevent preterm birth among individuals with a history of cervical insufficiency, individuals with a short cervix and history of preterm birth, or individuals with second-trimester painless dilation. Although cerclage reduces the mechanical stress on the cervix by reinforcing it with sutures, cerclage could also cause scarring of the cervix, which may affect the progress of labor. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the labor curves between individuals who underwent cerclage and those who did not undergo cerclage. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals with singleton term pregnancy, vertex presentation, and vaginal delivery, using the data from the Consortium on Safe Labor. We excluded individuals with fetal anomalies, stillbirth, or abnormal perinatal outcomes, including 5-minute Apgar score of <7, birth injury, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. We modeled the course of cervical dilation using repeated-measures analysis with a polynomial function and generated smoothed labor curves. An interval-censored regression analysis was performed to estimate traverse times (the elapsed time between 2 cervical dilation measures). The traverse times were compared between individuals who underwent cerclage and those who did not undergo cerclage, controlling for induction of labor and parity. RESULTS There were 245 individuals who underwent cerclage and 110,080 individuals who did not undergo cerclage. Individuals who underwent cerclage compared with those who did not undergo cerclage had a similar traverse time from 1 to 6 cm (median, 9.1 vs 10.3 hours; adjusted P=.37) and from 6 to 10 cm (median, 1.5 vs 1.5 hours; adjusted P=.23). Individuals who underwent cerclage compared with those who did not undergo cerclage had a longer traverse time from rupture of membranes to delivery (median, 4.0 vs 3.0 hours; adjusted P<.01). CONCLUSION Cervical cerclage did not affect the overall progress of labor. Cervical cerclage is an effective intervention to prevent preterm birth among individuals with a history of cervical insufficiency, individuals with a short cervix and history of preterm birth, or individuals with second-trimester painless dilation. Although cerclage reduces the mechanical stress on the cervix by reinforcing it with sutures, cerclage could also cause scarring of the cervix, which may affect the progress of labor. This study aimed to compare the labor curves between individuals who underwent cerclage and those who did not undergo cerclage. This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals with singleton term pregnancy, vertex presentation, and vaginal delivery, using the data from the Consortium on Safe Labor. We excluded individuals with fetal anomalies, stillbirth, or abnormal perinatal outcomes, including 5-minute Apgar score of <7, birth injury, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. We modeled the course of cervical dilation using repeated-measures analysis with a polynomial function and generated smoothed labor curves. An interval-censored regression analysis was performed to estimate traverse times (the elapsed time between 2 cervical dilation measures). The traverse times were compared between individuals who underwent cerclage and those who did not undergo cerclage, controlling for induction of labor and parity. There were 245 individuals who underwent cerclage and 110,080 individuals who did not undergo cerclage. Individuals who underwent cerclage compared with those who did not undergo cerclage had a similar traverse time from 1 to 6 cm (median, 9.1 vs 10.3 hours; adjusted P=.37) and from 6 to 10 cm (median, 1.5 vs 1.5 hours; adjusted P=.23). Individuals who underwent cerclage compared with those who did not undergo cerclage had a longer traverse time from rupture of membranes to delivery (median, 4.0 vs 3.0 hours; adjusted P<.01). Cervical cerclage did not affect the overall progress of labor.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
在水一方应助HEI采纳,获得10
刚刚
4秒前
爱科研的小虞完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
夏渃浠完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
馅饼完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
vans如意完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
zz完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
英俊的小懒虫完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
打工给猫买罐头完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
xxz完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
初晴完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
xianer发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
31秒前
小米完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
陌桑子完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
36秒前
HEI发布了新的文献求助10
39秒前
六包辣条完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
Jzag完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
六包辣条发布了新的文献求助10
44秒前
仙林AK47完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
xue完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
ABJ完成签到 ,获得积分10
48秒前
星尘完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
54秒前
cgl155410完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
天天快乐应助HEI采纳,获得10
57秒前
谢东轩发布了新的文献求助10
59秒前
1分钟前
谢东轩完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
嘟嘟杜完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
搬砖的化学男完成签到 ,获得积分0
1分钟前
fishhh完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
眼睛大的莫英完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
xianer完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
研友_8K2QJZ完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
科研通AI6.3应助xianer采纳,获得10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Handbuch Trainingswissenschaft – Trainingslehre 500
Additive Manufacturing Design and Applications (ASM Handbook, Volume 24A) 500
Variations: A More Diverse Picture of Contemporary Art 400
A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Fourth Edition 400
Induction Heating and Heat Treatment (ASM Handbook, Volume 4C) 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7586274
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9164575
关于积分的说明 19612384
捐赠科研通 7166909
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3266638
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2431657
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2258420