电休克疗法
蒙特利尔认知评估
重性抑郁障碍
认知
克朗巴赫阿尔法
不利影响
医学
精神科
心理学
临床心理学
内科学
认知障碍
心理测量学
作者
Xinyu Liu,Sixiang Liang,Jun Liu,Sha Sha,Ling Zhang,Wei Jiang,Changqing Jiang,Adriana P. Hermida,Yi‐lang Tang,William M. McDonald,Yanping Ren,Gang Wang
出处
期刊:Journal of Ect
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2023-11-27
标识
DOI:10.1097/yct.0000000000000977
摘要
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective somatic treatment, but it may be limited by cognitive adverse effects. The existing cognitive screening instruments often lack specificity to ECT-associated cognitive deficits. The ElectroConvulsive Therapy Cognitive Assessment was developed and validated in a clinical setting, but the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of ElectroConvulsive Therapy Cognitive Assessment (ECCA-C) have not been studied in a large clinical sample.The ECCA-C and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were administered to patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) undergoing ECT at 3 time points: pretreatment (baseline), before the fifth treatment, and 1 week posttreatment. The instruments were also administered to a sample of healthy subjects.Sixty-five patients with MDD and 50 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were recruited in this study. Overall, the patient group had statistically significantly lower MoCA and ECCA-C scores than the control group (both P values <0.001). The Cronbach α of the ECCA-C was 0.88 at baseline. Statistically significant decreases over time were observed in ECCA-C: pre-ECT (23.9 ± 4.0) > mid-ECT (21.3 ± 3.4) > post-ECT (18.7 ± 4.8) (all P values <0.001), whereas no statistically significant changes in MoCA scores were found at these 3 time points (F = 1.86, P = 0.165). A cutoff score of 26.5 on the ECCA-C was found to best differentiate between MDD patients and healthy controls.The ECCA-C showed satisfactory psychometric properties and may be a more sensitive instrument than the MoCA to assess cognitive impairment associated with ECT.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI