亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Peripheral Nerve Blocks in the Preoperative Management of Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

医学 荟萃分析 周围神经 外围设备 外科 内科学 解剖
作者
Minoru Hayashi,Norio Yamamoto,Naoto Kuroda,Kenichi Kano,Takanori Miura,Yuji Kamimura,Akihiro Shiroshita
出处
期刊:Annals of Emergency Medicine [Elsevier]
卷期号:83 (6): 522-538 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.024
摘要

Study objective

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative efficacy of peripheral nerve block types for preoperative pain management of hip fractures.

Methods

We searched Cochrane, Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar for randomized clinical trials. We included participants aged more than 16 years with hip fractures who received peripheral nerve blocks or analgesics for preoperative pain management. The primary outcomes were defined as absolute pain score 2 hours after block placement, preoperative consumption of morphine equivalents, and length of hospital stay. We used a random-effects network meta-analysis conceptualized in the Bayesian framework. Confidence of evidence was assessed using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA).

Results

We included 63 randomized controlled studies (4,778 participants), of which only a few had a low risk of bias. The femoral nerve block, 3-in-1 block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and pericapsular nerve group block yielded significantly lowered pain scores at 2 hours after block placement compared with those with no block (standardized mean differences [SMD]: −1.1; 95% credible interval [CrI]: −1.7 to −0.48, [confidence of evidence: low]; SMD: −1.8; 95% CrI: −3.0 to −0.55, [low]; SMD: −1.4; 95% CrI: −2.0 to −0.72, [low]; SMD: −2.3; 95% CrI: −3.2 to −1.4, [moderate], respectively). The pericapsular nerve group block, 3-in-1 block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and femoral nerve block resulted in lower pain scores than the no-block group. Additionally, the pericapsular nerve group block yielded a lower pain score than femoral nerve block or fascia iliaca compartment block (SMD: −1.21; 95% CrI: −2.18 to −0.23, [very low]: SMD: −0.92; 95% CrI: −1.70 to −0.16, [low]). However, both the fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block did not show a reduction in morphine consumption compared with no block. To our knowledge, no studies have compared the pericapsular nerve group block with other methods regarding morphine consumption. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between peripheral nerve blocks and no block in terms of the length of hospital stay.

Conclusions

Compared with no block, preoperative peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures appear to reduce pain 2 hours after block placement. Comparing different blocks, pericapsular nerve group block might be superior to fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block for pain relief, though the confidence evidence was low in most comparisons because of the moderate to high risk of bias in many of the included studies and the high heterogeneity of treatment strategies across studies. Therefore, further high-quality research is needed.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
大半个菜鸟完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
大个应助ceeray23采纳,获得20
26秒前
34秒前
CipherSage应助ceeray23采纳,获得20
41秒前
41秒前
46秒前
49秒前
54秒前
害怕的板凳完成签到 ,获得积分10
58秒前
BowieHuang应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
BowieHuang应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
寻道图强应助科研通管家采纳,获得50
1分钟前
ceeray23应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1分钟前
BowieHuang应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
ceeray23应助科研通管家采纳,获得300
1分钟前
爱科研的小凡完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
稳重的冷亦完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
caca完成签到,获得积分0
1分钟前
星辰大海应助ceeray23采纳,获得20
1分钟前
柳行天完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
汉堡包应助Cmqq采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Kraghc发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
Kraghc完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
kkw发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
OnlyHarbour发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Cmqq发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
小洛完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
凸迩丝儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
大模型应助ceeray23采纳,获得20
2分钟前
反恐分子应助ceeray23采纳,获得20
2分钟前
OnlyHarbour完成签到,获得积分20
2分钟前
我是老大应助Cmqq采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems Third Edition 2000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 临床微生物学程序手册,多卷,第5版 2000
人脑智能与人工智能 1000
King Tyrant 720
Silicon in Organic, Organometallic, and Polymer Chemistry 500
Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing, 3rd Edition 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5599776
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4685512
关于积分的说明 14838542
捐赠科研通 4670527
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2538202
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1505527
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1470904