已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Peripheral Nerve Blocks in the Preoperative Management of Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

医学 荟萃分析 置信区间 神经阻滞 随机对照试验 麻醉 相对风险 外科 内科学
作者
Minoru Hayashi,Norio Yamamoto,Naoto Kuroda,Kenichi Kano,Takanori Miura,Yuji Kamimura,Akihiro Shiroshita
出处
期刊:Annals of Emergency Medicine [Elsevier]
被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.024
摘要

Study objective

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative efficacy of peripheral nerve block types for preoperative pain management of hip fractures.

Methods

We searched Cochrane, Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar for randomized clinical trials. We included participants aged more than 16 years with hip fractures who received peripheral nerve blocks or analgesics for preoperative pain management. The primary outcomes were defined as absolute pain score 2 hours after block placement, preoperative consumption of morphine equivalents, and length of hospital stay. We used a random-effects network meta-analysis conceptualized in the Bayesian framework. Confidence of evidence was assessed using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA).

Results

We included 63 randomized controlled studies (4,778 participants), of which only a few had a low risk of bias. The femoral nerve block, 3-in-1 block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and pericapsular nerve group block yielded significantly lowered pain scores at 2 hours after block placement compared with those with no block (standardized mean differences [SMD]: −1.1; 95% credible interval [CrI]: −1.7 to −0.48, [confidence of evidence: low]; SMD: −1.8; 95% CrI: −3.0 to −0.55, [low]; SMD: −1.4; 95% CrI: −2.0 to −0.72, [low]; SMD: −2.3; 95% CrI: −3.2 to −1.4, [moderate], respectively). The pericapsular nerve group block, 3-in-1 block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and femoral nerve block resulted in lower pain scores than the no-block group. Additionally, the pericapsular nerve group block yielded a lower pain score than femoral nerve block or fascia iliaca compartment block (SMD: −1.21; 95% CrI: −2.18 to −0.23, [very low]: SMD: −0.92; 95% CrI: −1.70 to −0.16, [low]). However, both the fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block did not show a reduction in morphine consumption compared with no block. To our knowledge, no studies have compared the pericapsular nerve group block with other methods regarding morphine consumption. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between peripheral nerve blocks and no block in terms of the length of hospital stay.

Conclusions

Compared with no block, preoperative peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures appear to reduce pain 2 hours after block placement. Comparing different blocks, pericapsular nerve group block might be superior to fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block for pain relief, though the confidence evidence was low in most comparisons because of the moderate to high risk of bias in many of the included studies and the high heterogeneity of treatment strategies across studies. Therefore, further high-quality research is needed.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
伏伏伏发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
yao完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
豆子给aspire的求助进行了留言
2秒前
3秒前
罗瑞发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
淘宝叮咚完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
articlechaser发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
小孙发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
x123发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
goodesBright应助林林采纳,获得30
12秒前
aaa大个完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
ninalee发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
科研通AI2S应助LX采纳,获得10
15秒前
香蕉凌柏完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
honeylaker完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
小雪发布了新的文献求助20
18秒前
Ava应助冲刺的仙人掌采纳,获得10
19秒前
美满的鲂完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
Akim应助司空秋烟采纳,获得10
19秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
李爱国应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
Nothing关注了科研通微信公众号
21秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
华仔应助puff采纳,获得10
21秒前
24秒前
24秒前
深情安青应助冷面采纳,获得10
25秒前
烟花应助复杂静竹采纳,获得10
26秒前
27秒前
kkk发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
愤怒的紫青完成签到,获得积分20
29秒前
科研通AI2S应助平萱采纳,获得10
29秒前
Spine完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
正函数完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
念清宸发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in ’Tides Chemistry 2000
Studien zur Ideengeschichte der Gesetzgebung 1000
The ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication 1000
TM 5-855-1(Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons) 1000
Handbook of the Mammals of the World – Volume 3: Primates 805
Ethnicities: Media, Health, and Coping 800
Gerard de Lairesse : an artist between stage and studio 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3072376
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2726162
关于积分的说明 7492979
捐赠科研通 2373785
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1258716
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 610362
版权声明 596952