已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Peripheral Nerve Blocks in the Preoperative Management of Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

医学 荟萃分析 周围神经 外围设备 外科 内科学 解剖
作者
Minoru Hayashi,Norio Yamamoto,Naoto Kuroda,Kenichi Kano,Takanori Miura,Yuji Kamimura,Akihiro Shiroshita
出处
期刊:Annals of Emergency Medicine [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:83 (6): 522-538 被引量:24
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.024
摘要

Study objective

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative efficacy of peripheral nerve block types for preoperative pain management of hip fractures.

Methods

We searched Cochrane, Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar for randomized clinical trials. We included participants aged more than 16 years with hip fractures who received peripheral nerve blocks or analgesics for preoperative pain management. The primary outcomes were defined as absolute pain score 2 hours after block placement, preoperative consumption of morphine equivalents, and length of hospital stay. We used a random-effects network meta-analysis conceptualized in the Bayesian framework. Confidence of evidence was assessed using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA).

Results

We included 63 randomized controlled studies (4,778 participants), of which only a few had a low risk of bias. The femoral nerve block, 3-in-1 block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and pericapsular nerve group block yielded significantly lowered pain scores at 2 hours after block placement compared with those with no block (standardized mean differences [SMD]: −1.1; 95% credible interval [CrI]: −1.7 to −0.48, [confidence of evidence: low]; SMD: −1.8; 95% CrI: −3.0 to −0.55, [low]; SMD: −1.4; 95% CrI: −2.0 to −0.72, [low]; SMD: −2.3; 95% CrI: −3.2 to −1.4, [moderate], respectively). The pericapsular nerve group block, 3-in-1 block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and femoral nerve block resulted in lower pain scores than the no-block group. Additionally, the pericapsular nerve group block yielded a lower pain score than femoral nerve block or fascia iliaca compartment block (SMD: −1.21; 95% CrI: −2.18 to −0.23, [very low]: SMD: −0.92; 95% CrI: −1.70 to −0.16, [low]). However, both the fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block did not show a reduction in morphine consumption compared with no block. To our knowledge, no studies have compared the pericapsular nerve group block with other methods regarding morphine consumption. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between peripheral nerve blocks and no block in terms of the length of hospital stay.

Conclusions

Compared with no block, preoperative peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures appear to reduce pain 2 hours after block placement. Comparing different blocks, pericapsular nerve group block might be superior to fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block for pain relief, though the confidence evidence was low in most comparisons because of the moderate to high risk of bias in many of the included studies and the high heterogeneity of treatment strategies across studies. Therefore, further high-quality research is needed.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Daya完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
qqqq发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Leung完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Han完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
日出完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
大气的柜子完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被make217采纳,获得10
9秒前
遇见一只鹿完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
xiuwenli发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
学术雷锋发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
忧郁小刺猬完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
重要静柏完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
传奇3的应助被学术雷锋采纳,获得20
13秒前
77完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
惊霰完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
LW完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
王世缘完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
Cathy完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
殷勤的亦竹完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
yangyang发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
文静凝芙完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
初景的应助被学术雷锋采纳,获得20
26秒前
26秒前
远赴倒悬山完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
ohh完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
英俊的铭的应助被samosa采纳,获得10
31秒前
雾昂完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
GingerF的应助被Dafu采纳,获得50
31秒前
踏实完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
Jourmore完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
37秒前
C.Cat的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
38秒前
慕青的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
39秒前
may的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
39秒前
搜集达人的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
39秒前
尊嘟假嘟的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得30
39秒前
C.Cat的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
39秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Spec 401: Standards for Jet Fuel Facility and Equipment Commissioning and Flushing at Airports, 2026.1 (Original Issue) 1000
Spec 103: Standard for Jet Fuel Quality Control at Airports, Revision 2026.1 1000
The Future of Digital Well-Being 800
5th World Conference on Detergents: Reinventing the Industry : Opportunities and Challenges 500
Erzählte Gnade 500
Butadiene hydroxytelechelic oligomers PBHT 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8102490
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9512688
关于积分的说明 21483192
捐赠科研通 7678403
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3408839
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2536494
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2448796