Peripheral Nerve Blocks in the Preoperative Management of Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

医学 荟萃分析 周围神经 外围设备 外科 内科学 解剖
作者
Minoru Hayashi,Norio Yamamoto,Naoto Kuroda,Kenichi Kano,Takanori Miura,Yuji Kamimura,Akihiro Shiroshita
出处
期刊:Annals of Emergency Medicine [Elsevier]
卷期号:83 (6): 522-538 被引量:24
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.024
摘要

Study objective

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative efficacy of peripheral nerve block types for preoperative pain management of hip fractures.

Methods

We searched Cochrane, Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar for randomized clinical trials. We included participants aged more than 16 years with hip fractures who received peripheral nerve blocks or analgesics for preoperative pain management. The primary outcomes were defined as absolute pain score 2 hours after block placement, preoperative consumption of morphine equivalents, and length of hospital stay. We used a random-effects network meta-analysis conceptualized in the Bayesian framework. Confidence of evidence was assessed using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA).

Results

We included 63 randomized controlled studies (4,778 participants), of which only a few had a low risk of bias. The femoral nerve block, 3-in-1 block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and pericapsular nerve group block yielded significantly lowered pain scores at 2 hours after block placement compared with those with no block (standardized mean differences [SMD]: −1.1; 95% credible interval [CrI]: −1.7 to −0.48, [confidence of evidence: low]; SMD: −1.8; 95% CrI: −3.0 to −0.55, [low]; SMD: −1.4; 95% CrI: −2.0 to −0.72, [low]; SMD: −2.3; 95% CrI: −3.2 to −1.4, [moderate], respectively). The pericapsular nerve group block, 3-in-1 block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and femoral nerve block resulted in lower pain scores than the no-block group. Additionally, the pericapsular nerve group block yielded a lower pain score than femoral nerve block or fascia iliaca compartment block (SMD: −1.21; 95% CrI: −2.18 to −0.23, [very low]: SMD: −0.92; 95% CrI: −1.70 to −0.16, [low]). However, both the fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block did not show a reduction in morphine consumption compared with no block. To our knowledge, no studies have compared the pericapsular nerve group block with other methods regarding morphine consumption. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between peripheral nerve blocks and no block in terms of the length of hospital stay.

Conclusions

Compared with no block, preoperative peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures appear to reduce pain 2 hours after block placement. Comparing different blocks, pericapsular nerve group block might be superior to fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block for pain relief, though the confidence evidence was low in most comparisons because of the moderate to high risk of bias in many of the included studies and the high heterogeneity of treatment strategies across studies. Therefore, further high-quality research is needed.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
orixero应助年轻就要气盛采纳,获得10
1秒前
violet完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
充电宝应助健忘的雨安采纳,获得10
4秒前
dfggg发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
饱满的问丝完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
大水完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
Akira完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
隐形曼青应助是ok耶采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
11111发布了新的文献求助20
11秒前
大水发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
小蘑菇应助保持科研热情采纳,获得10
13秒前
所所应助蓦然采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
爱科研的小蜗啊完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
从容梦山发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
luo完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
HQQ完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
Ava应助夏洛采纳,获得10
20秒前
小二郎应助violet采纳,获得10
20秒前
乐观的灭绝完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
文艺大白菜完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
难过的谷芹应助无为采纳,获得10
21秒前
情怀应助Ljh采纳,获得10
22秒前
23秒前
23秒前
23秒前
赘婿应助秋qiu采纳,获得10
23秒前
24秒前
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
从k到英国情人 1500
Ägyptische Geschichte der 21.–30. Dynastie 1100
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1100
Real World Research, 5th Edition 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5737586
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5373212
关于积分的说明 15335749
捐赠科研通 4880965
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2623199
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1572027
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1528848