Executive Summary: Guidelines on Use of Corticosteroids in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, and Community-Acquired Pneumonia Focused Update 2024

医学 重症监护医学 急性呼吸窘迫综合征 败血症 感染性休克 肺炎 人口 重症监护 随机对照试验 批判性评价 替代医学 内科学 病理 环境卫生
作者
Dipayan Chaudhuri,Andrea M. Nei,Bram Rochwerg,R.A. Balk,Karim Asehnoune,Rhonda Cadena,Joseph A. Carcillo,Ricardo Correa,Katherine Drover,Annette Esper,Hayley B. Gershengorn,Naomi Hammond,Namita Jayaprakash,Kusum Menon,Lama Nazer,Tyler Pitre,Zaffer Qasim,James A. Russell,Ariel Santos,Aarti Sarwal
出处
期刊:Critical Care Medicine [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:52 (5): 833-836 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1097/ccm.0000000000006171
摘要

Critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) is a state of systemic inflammation with associated dysregulation of the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis, altered cortisol metabolism, and tissue glucocorticoid resistance (1) that is common in acutely ill patients requiring hospitalization. A multispecialty task force of international experts in critical care medicine and endocrinology from the membership of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine previously issued guidelines on the diagnosis of and management of CIRCI across a number of clinical conditions, first in 2008 (2) and then in 2017 (3,4). Since then, multiple new trials examining the use of corticosteroids in the acutely ill have been published, creating a need to update recommendations inclusive of new evidence. This executive summary provides an update on the previous guidelines on CIRCI, with a focus on sepsis and septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), which were prioritized as the most common diagnoses in which corticosteroids are considered and those with sufficient new data that reevaluation was warranted. After development of five focused Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes questions for this focused update, the panel conducted systematic reviews to identify the best available evidence addressing each question. We evaluated the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach and formulated recommendation using the evidence-to-decision framework. The strength of each recommendation was designated as strong (signified by "we recommend") or conditional (signified by "we suggest"). The panel sought to provide recommendations in both adult and pediatric patient populations, as appropriate, based on available evidence. A summary of recommendations is provided in Table 1. A full description of the recommendations is provided in the complete guidelines document. TABLE 1. - Summary of Recommendations Recommendations Recommendation Strength, Quality of Evidence Septic shock 1A. We "suggest" administering corticosteroids to adult patients with septic shock Conditional recommendation, low certainty evidence 1B. We "recommend against" administration of high dose/short duration corticosteroids (> 400 mg/d hydrocortisone equivalent for less than 3 d) for adult patients with septic shock (strong recommendation, low certainty) Strong recommendation, moderate certainty evidence Acute respiratory distress syndrome 2A. We "suggest" administering corticosteroids to adult hospitalized patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome Conditional recommendation, moderate certainty evidence Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia 3A. We "recommend" administering corticosteroids to adult patients hospitalized with severe bacterial community acquired pneumonia Strong recommendation, moderate certainty evidence Corticosteroids in Sepsis and Septic Shock Recommendation 1A) We suggest administering corticosteroids to adult patients with septic shock (conditional recommendation, low certainty). 1B) We recommend against administration of high dose/short duration corticosteroids (defined as > 400 mg/d of hydrocortisone equivalent for < 3 d) for adult patients with septic shock (strong recommendation, moderate certainty). Remark: We make no recommendation for corticosteroid use in pediatric patients with sepsis. Rationale Most studies included patients with septic shock and showed small to moderate desirable effects. Although there was only a small reduction in mortality with low to moderate certainty evidence, there was a larger reduction in shock reversal and organ dysfunction with high certainty evidence (3,5–10). The panel felt that given the high prevalence of septic shock worldwide, even a small reduction in mortality can have a large effect and that the reduction in shock reversal and organ dysfunction can have important implications in resource utilization. Undesirable effects were felt to be uncertain but anticipated to be small. Further, the intervention was deemed feasible, equitable and acceptable to healthcare providers. The panel did not make a specific recommendation regarding corticosteroid regimen, but recommended against use of high dose, short duration corticosteroids given the risk of adverse effects. Although the panel did not make a specific recommendation on sepsis without shock, if patients present with sepsis and severe CAP or sepsis with ARDS, we suggest administering corticosteroids. Finally, the recommendation for corticosteroid use in sepsis has uncertain generalizability to the pediatric population due to limited available studies. Corticosteroids in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Recommendations 2A) We "suggest" administering corticosteroids to adult critically ill patients with ARDS (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty). Remark: We make no recommendation for corticosteroid use in pediatric patients with ARDS. Rationale Corticosteroids provide moderate desirable effects, driven primarily by moderate certainty evidence that it reduces hospital mortality (3,11–15). This effect is more pronounced when corticosteroids are given for more than 7 days. However, the ideal corticosteroid dose, timing, and type remains unknown and left up to clinician comfort and other considerations. This is in contrast to the previous recommendation in 2017 that suggested giving methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg within 14 days of diagnosis of ARDS (3). Undesirable effects of corticosteroids and their cost-effectiveness remain unknown. However, corticosteroid use was deemed feasible and acceptable to healthcare providers. Overall, the panel felt that the benefits of corticosteroid use outweighed its risks. The recommendation has uncertain generalizability to pediatric patients as there were no randomized controlled trials in this population. Corticosteroids in Community-Acquired Pneumonia Recommendations 3A) We "recommend" administering corticosteroids for adult patients hospitalized with severe bacterial community-acquired pneumonia (strong recommendation, moderate certainty). Remark: We make no recommendation for corticosteroid use in pediatric patients with CAP. Rationale Corticosteroids provide large desirable effects in severe CAP with moderate certainty evidence indicating a decrease in hospital mortality and need for invasive mechanical ventilation (4,16,17). The same mortality benefit is not seen in patients with less severe CAP (4,18,19). Undesirable effects, while unknown as with ARDS and sepsis, are anticipated to be small. Use of corticosteroids in CAP was felt to be feasible, acceptable and may be associated with cost savings (20). As with sepsis and ARDS, the panel was unable to make recommendations on use of corticosteroids for CAP in pediatric patients due to lack of available literature.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
踏实的怜菡完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
qwerty完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
墨墨叻发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
科研通AI6应助Mm林采纳,获得10
1秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
包子发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
VIOLET完成签到 ,获得积分20
4秒前
tinatian270发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
不知名选手完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
orixero应助南城花开采纳,获得10
5秒前
碎碎发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
mogeko完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
啊嚏发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
哈基咪发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
英姑应助尕辉采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
小李完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
xs发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
伞下铭发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
caihong1发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
昏睡的蟠桃应助调皮凤妖采纳,获得40
13秒前
14秒前
包子完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
龚文亮完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
熬夜波比应助清浅采纳,获得10
15秒前
喵了个咪发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
alvis完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Translanguaging in Action in English-Medium Classrooms: A Resource Book for Teachers 700
Exploring Nostalgia 500
Natural Product Extraction: Principles and Applications 500
Exosomes Pipeline Insight, 2025 500
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 500
Advanced Memory Technology: Functional Materials and Devices 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5666928
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4883518
关于积分的说明 15118330
捐赠科研通 4825864
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2583597
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1537760
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1495956