漏斗图
医学
荟萃分析
背景(考古学)
出版偏见
致盲
类阿片
安慰剂
随机对照试验
梅德林
数据提取
置信区间
羟考酮
麻醉
外科
内科学
替代医学
病理
生物
古生物学
受体
政治学
法学
作者
Anne Wolf,Matthias Unterberg,Andrea Witowski,Michael Adamzik,Alexander Wolf
出处
期刊:PLOS ONE
[Public Library of Science]
日期:2024-02-29
卷期号:19 (2): e0299320-e0299320
标识
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0299320
摘要
This will be the first meta-analysis on the efficacy, safety, and side effects of oliceridine on postoperative pain. Our aim with this work is to evaluate the clinical utility of this relatively new substance in a broad postoperative context. Oliceridine is a new so-called bias opioid that is approved for severe pain requiring an opioid. Due to its biased agonism, it is said to have fewer side effects than conventional opioids. This systematic review and meta-analysis will analyze the efficacy, safety, and side effects of oliceridine compared to placebo or morphine in acute postoperative pain for up to 72 hours. In January 2024, an extensive search in various databases will be performed without restrictions for randomized controlled trials with at least single blinding. After data extraction, data will be pooled and meta-analytic calculations performed. A random-effects model will be used. Dichotomous data will be presented as risk ratio and continuous data as standardized mean difference. Dose-dependent side effects will be evaluated with meta-regression. Heterogeneity will be assessed via the Q statistic and prediction interval in case of a sufficient number of included studies. Publication bias will be examined using funnel plot and Duval and Tweedie’s trim and fill method.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI