Estimating the per-protocol effect of lithium on suicidality in a randomized trial of individuals with depression or bipolar disorder

锂(药物) 危险系数 安慰剂 精神科 萧条(经济学) 随机对照试验 双相情感障碍 医学 重性抑郁障碍 毒物控制 内科学 心理学 置信区间 急诊医学 心情 宏观经济学 病理 经济 替代医学
作者
Alejandro G. Szmulewicz,Arin L. Madenci,Ryan Ferguson,Matthew H. Liang,Robert Lew,Ira R. Katz,Miguel A. Hernán
出处
期刊:Journal of Psychopharmacology [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:37 (6): 539-544
标识
DOI:10.1177/02698811231166460
摘要

Background: The CSP590 randomized trial was designed to estimate the effect of lithium on suicidality. After a third of the intended number of participants were enrolled, the hazard ratio of suicidality was 1.10 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.55). Based on this, the trial was stopped for futility. However, only 17% of patients adhered to the specified protocol. Aims: The objective was to estimate the per-protocol effect of lithium on suicidality, that is, the effect of adhering to the treatment strategies as specified in the protocol. Methods: We stopped individuals’ follow-up if/when they showed evidence of nonadherence. We then conducted the analysis in the restricted sample, adjusting for prognostic factors that predict adherence via inverse probability weighting. The primary outcome was the 12-month risk of suicidality (including death from suicide, suicide attempt, interrupted attempt, hospitalization specifically to prevent suicide). Results: The estimated 12-month risk of suicidality was 18.8% for lithium, and 24.3% for placebo. The risk ratio was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.43, 1.37) and the risk difference −5.5 percentage points (95% CI: −17.5, 5.5). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: With one-third of the targeted sample size, lithium effects (compared with placebo) ranging between a 17.5% reduction and a 5.5% increase in the risk of suicidality were highly compatible with the data. Thus, a protective effect of lithium on suicidality among patients with bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder cannot be ruled out. Trials should incorporate adequate per-protocol analyses into the decision-making processes for stopping trials for futility.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
乐乐应助瘦瘦的艳采纳,获得10
刚刚
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
尔玉完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
桐桐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
CodeCraft应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
香蕉觅云应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
今后应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
2秒前
思源应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
小蘑菇应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
lh0907发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
CodeCraft应助Galaxy采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
衣吾余完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
爱吃大米饭完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
我是老大应助缓慢耳机采纳,获得10
4秒前
生信好难完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
浅忆晨曦发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
nan应助肘汁派采纳,获得10
7秒前
风趣静枫完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Vann完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
科研顺路发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
kiveeen发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
王智勇完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
lh0907完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
Pipeline and riser loss of containment 2001 - 2020 (PARLOC 2020) 1000
哈工大泛函分析教案课件、“72小时速成泛函分析:从入门到入土.PDF”等 660
Comparing natural with chemical additive production 500
The Leucovorin Guide for Parents: Understanding Autism’s Folate 500
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 500
A Manual for the Identification of Plant Seeds and Fruits : Second revised edition 500
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.) 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5207786
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4385675
关于积分的说明 13657801
捐赠科研通 4244340
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2328746
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1326528
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1278611