分散注意力
心理学
期望理论
价(化学)
认知心理学
任务(项目管理)
控制(管理)
背景(考古学)
注意力控制
认知
社会心理学
计算机科学
古生物学
人工智能
经济
物理
神经科学
生物
管理
量子力学
作者
Constantin Schmidts,Anna Foerster,Thomas Kleinsorge,Wilfried Kunde
出处
期刊:Cognition
[Elsevier]
日期:2019-09-11
卷期号:194: 104072-104072
被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104072
摘要
Unpleasant stimuli disrupt ongoing information processing, even when they are entirely task-irrelevant. We examined whether such affective disturbances can be controlled explicitly and proactively. Specifically, we studied two different mechanisms to induce proactive control: the experience of frequent affective distraction and cueing of upcoming affective distraction. We predicted that both mechanisms would shield the attentional system from affective disturbance. Participants solved a letter classification task while being exposed to neutral or negative distractor pictures. We varied whether the proportion of negative distractors was low or high and whether cues for the upcoming type of distractor valence were informative or uninformative. In three experiments (N = 114), we found support for the notion that experience-based control shields information processing from affective disturbances, whereas distractor valence expectations were not helpful. These data suggest that there is no explicit top-down influence on attentional control settings of affective distraction, just adjustments to the context.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI