作者
Eric L. Simpson,Robert Bissonnette,Lawrence F. Eichenfield,Emma Guttman‐Yassky,Brett King,Jonathan I. Silverberg,Lisa A. Beck,Thomas Bieber,Kristian Reich,Kenji Kabashima,M.M.B. Seyger,Elaine C. Siegfried,Georg Stingl,Steven R. Feldman,Alan Menter,Peter van de Kerkhof,Gil Yosipovitch,C. Paul,Philippe Martel,Ariane Dubost-Brama,John Armstrong,Rajeev Chavda,Steve Frey,Y. Joubert,M. Milutinovic,Anne Parneix,Henrique D. Teixeira,Chen-Yen Lin,Luna Sun,Paul Klekotka,Brian J. Nickoloff,Yves Dutronc,Lotus Mallbris,Jonathan Janes,Amy M. DeLozier,Fabio P. Nunes,Amy S. Paller
摘要
BackgroundAn Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) is recommended by health agencies for drug registration in atopic dermatitis (AD). Current IGA scales lack standardization.ObjectivesTo develop an IGA scale, training module, and clinical certification examination for use in AD trials; establish content validity; and assess reliability.MethodsExpert dermatologists participated in the development of the validated IGA for AD (vIGA-ADTM). Reliability (interrater and intrarater) was assessed by 2 web-based surveys. Clinical certification for investigators consisted of a training module and examination.ResultsExpert consensus was achieved around a 5-point IGA scale including morphologic descriptions, and content validity was established. Survey 1 showed strong interrater reliability (Kendall's coefficient of concordance W [Kendall's W], 0.809; intraclass correlation [ICC], 0.817) and excellent agreement (weighted kappa, 0.857). Survey 2, completed 5 months after training of dermatologists, showed improvements in scale reliability (Kendall's W, 0.819; ICC, 0.852; weighted kappa, 0.889). In this study, 627 investigators completed vIGA-AD training and certification.LimitationsRatings were assessed on photographs.ConclusionA validated IGA scale and training module were developed with the intent of harmonizing assessment of disease severity in AD trials. Strong reliability and excellent agreement between assessments were observed.