亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Comparison of diagnostic value of SWE, FNA and BRAF gene detection in ACR TI-RADS 4 and 5 thyroid nodules.

医学 甲状腺结节 甲状腺 放射科 内科学 结核(地质) 细针穿刺 甲状腺癌 甲状腺癌 甲状腺炎 细胞学 核医学 恶性肿瘤 诊断准确性
作者
Wei-Bing Zhang,Wen-Fang Deng,Lun Mao,Bei-Li He,Hua Liu,Jian Chen,Yu Liu,Ting-Yue Qi
出处
期刊:Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation [IOS Press]
标识
DOI:10.3233/ch-211280
摘要

To compare the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE), fine needle aspiration (FNA) and BRAF gene detection (BRAFV600E gene mutation detection) in ACR TI-RADS 4 and 5 thyroid nodules.SWE images, FNA cytological results and BRAF detection results of ACR TI-RADS 4 and 5 thyroid nodules confirmed by pathology were analyzed retrospectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to determine the best cutoff value of SWE Emax. In the combined diagnosis of SWE, FNA and BRAF, firstly, the nodules with BRAF gene mutation were included in the positive ones, secondly, the nodules with benign and malignant FNA were included in the FNA + SWE or FNA + SWE + BRAF negative and positive ones respectively, finally, for FNA uncertain nodules: those whose SWE Emax were less than or equal to the cutoff value were included in FNA + SWE or FNA + SWE + BRAF negative ones, and those whose SWE Emax were greater than the cutoff value were included in positive ones. The diagnostic efficacy of SWE, FNA, SWE + FNA, FNA + BRAF and their combination in ACR TI-RADS 4 and 5 thyroid nodules were compared.The ROC curve showed that the best cutoff value of SWE Emax was 40.9 kpa, and the area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.842 (0.800∼0.885). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of SWE were 76.3% (270/354), 75.5% (80/106) and 76.1% (350/460), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FNA were 58.2% (206/354), 88.7% (94/106) and 65.2(300/460), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FNA + BRAF were 95.5% (338/354), 88.7% (94/106) and 93.9% (432/460), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of SWE + FNA were 85.9% (304/354), 98.1% (104/106) and 88.7% (408/460), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of SWE + FNA + BRAF were 98.3% (348/354), 98.1% (104/106) and 98.3% (452/460), respectively. For the diagnostic accuracy, SWE + FNA + BRAF > FNA + BRAF > FNA + SWE > SWE > FNA, the difference was statistically significant (all P > 0.05).For ACR TI-RADS 4 and 5 thyroid nodules, SWE and FNA have high diagnostic efficiency. For the diagnostic accuracy, FNA + BRAF is better than FNA + SWE. FNA combination with BRAF gene detection further improves the diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy of FNA. The combined application of the three is the best.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
端庄书雁发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Cpp完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
宇宙大王崔崔鲨完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
10秒前
小二郎应助白灼虾采纳,获得10
11秒前
yongziwu完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
热心小萱发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
缥缈夏彤完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
18秒前
OLIVIA完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
互助应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
22秒前
22秒前
白灼虾发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
ms发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
ohwhale完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
28秒前
Chris完成签到 ,获得积分0
29秒前
30秒前
热心小萱完成签到,获得积分20
31秒前
小二郎应助刻苦的雨莲采纳,获得30
33秒前
CQ发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
ms完成签到,获得积分20
36秒前
敏感的飞松完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
orixero应助yyy采纳,获得10
37秒前
40秒前
意已完成签到,获得积分20
43秒前
ss发布了新的文献求助10
44秒前
芒果完成签到 ,获得积分10
45秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助羽翼采纳,获得10
45秒前
45秒前
48秒前
52秒前
果果发布了新的文献求助10
53秒前
56秒前
56秒前
幼儿园老大完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 2000
The Social Psychology of Citizenship 1000
Streptostylie bei Dinosauriern nebst Bemerkungen über die 540
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 510
Brittle Fracture in Welded Ships 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5920637
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 6904064
关于积分的说明 15813973
捐赠科研通 5047597
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2716297
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1669669
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1606687