医学
观察研究
随机对照试验
介入性疼痛治疗
医学物理学
金标准(测试)
报告审判综合标准
系统回顾
可靠性(半导体)
内部有效性
梅德林
物理疗法
重症监护医学
疼痛管理
外科
病理
放射科
功率(物理)
法学
物理
量子力学
政治学
作者
Laxmaiah Manchikanti,Hirsch Ja,Heavner Je,Cohen Sp,Benyamin Rm,Nalini Sehgal,Falco Fj,Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo,Obi Onyewu,Jianguo Zhu,Kaye Ad,MV Boswell,Standiford Helm,Candido Kd,Sudhir Diwan,Simopoulos Tt,Singh,Pampati,Racz Gb,Raj P
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:2014-05-23
卷期号:17 (3): E291-317
被引量:21
摘要
The major component of a systematic review is assessment of the methodologic quality and bias of randomized and nonrandomized trials. While there are multiple instruments available to assess the methodologic quality and bias for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), there is a lack of extensively utilized instruments for observational studies, specifically for interventional pain management (IPM) techniques. Even Cochrane review criteria for randomized trials is considered not to be a "gold standard," but merely an indication of the current state of the art review methodology. Recently a specific instrument to assess the methodologic quality of randomized trials has been developed for interventional techniques.Our objective was to develop an IPM specific instrument to assess the methodological quality of nonrandomized trials or observational studies of interventional techniques.The item generation for the instrument was based on a definition of quality, to the extent to which the design and conduct of the trial were congruent with the objectives of the study. Applicability was defined as the extent to which procedures produced by the study could be applied using contemporary IPM techniques. Multiple items based on Cochrane review criteria and Interventional Pain Management Techniques - Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment for Nonrandomized Studies (IPM-QRBNR) were utilized.A total of 16 items were developed which formed the IPM-QRBNR tool. The assessment was performed in multiple stages. The final assessment was 4 nonrandomized studies. The inter-rater agreement was moderate to good for IPM-QRBNR criteria.Limited validity or accuracy assessment of the instrument and the large number of items to be scored were limitations.We have developed a new comprehensive instrument to assess the methodological quality of nonrandomized studies of interventional techniques. This instrument provides extensive information specific to interventional techniques is useful in assessing the methodological quality and bias of observational studies of interventional techniques.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI