A cluster randomised trial of strategies to increase cervical screening uptake at first invitation (STRATEGIC)

医学 星团(航天器) 整群随机对照试验 梅德林 宫颈筛查 随机对照试验 家庭医学 物理疗法 重症监护医学 内科学 宫颈癌 政治学 计算机科学 癌症 程序设计语言 法学
作者
Henry C Kitchener,Matthew Gittins,Oliver Rivero‐Arias,Apostolos Tsiachristas,Margaret Cruickshank,Alastair Gray,Loretta Brabin,David Torgerson,Emma J. Crosbie,Alexandra Sargent,Chris Roberts
出处
期刊:Health Technology Assessment [NIHR Journals Library]
卷期号:20 (68): 1-138 被引量:44
标识
DOI:10.3310/hta20680
摘要

Background Falling participation by young women in cervical screening has been observed at a time that has seen an increase in the incidence of cervical cancer in the UK in women aged < 35 years. Various barriers to screening have been documented, including fear, embarrassment and inconvenience. Objectives To measure the feasibility, clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a range of interventions to increase the uptake of cervical screening among young women. Design A cluster randomised trial based on general practices performed in two phases. Setting Primary care in Greater Manchester and the Grampian region in Scotland. Participants Phase 1: 20,879 women receiving their first invitation for cervical screening. Phase 2: 10,126 women who had not attended by 6 months. Interventions Phase 1: pre-invitation leaflet or not, and access to online booking (Manchester only). Phase 2: (1) vaginal self-sampling kits (SSKs) sent unrequested ( n = 1141); or (2) offered on request ( n = 1290); (3) provided with a timed appointment ( n = 1629); (4) offered access to a nurse navigator (NN) ( n = 1007); or (5) offered a choice between a NN or a SSK ( n = 1277); and 3782 women in control practices. Main outcome measures Uplift in screening compared with control practices, cost-effectiveness of interventions, and the women’s preferences explored in a discrete choice experiment. Results The pre-invitation leaflet and offer of online booking were ineffective when compared with control practices at 3 months, 18.8% versus 19.2% [odds ratio (OR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.06; p = 0.485] and 17.8% versus 17.2% (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.20; p = 0.802), respectively. The uptake of screening at 3 months was higher among previously human papillomavirus (HPV)-vaccinated women than unvaccinated women, 23.7% versus 11% (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.53; p < 0.001). Among non-attenders, the SSK sent intervention showed a statistically significant increase in uptake at 12 months post invitation, 21.3% versus 16.2% (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.91; p = 0.001), as did timed appointments, 19.8% versus 16.2% (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.74; p = 0.001). The offer of a NN, a SSK on request, and a choice between timed appointments and NN were ineffective. Overall, there was a gradual rather than prompt response, as demonstrated by uptake among control practices. A discrete choice experiment indicated that women invited who had not yet attended valued the attributes inherent in self-sampling. The health economic analysis showed that both timed appointments and unsolicited SSK sent were likely to be cost-effective at a cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained of £7593 and £8434, respectively, if extended across the national 25-year-old cohort throughout the duration of screening. The certainty of these being cost-effective at a ceiling ratio of £20,000 per QALY gained was > 90%. Conclusion Women receiving their initial screening invitation frequently delay taking up the offer and the net impact of interventions was small. Timed appointments and SSKs sent to non-attenders at 6 months are likely to be a cost-effective means of increasing uptake and should be considered further. HPV vaccination in the catch-up programme was associated with an increased uptake of cervical screening. Future work should focus on optimising self-sampling in terms of age range, timing of offer for non-attenders and use of urine testing instead of vaginal samples. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN52303479. Funding This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment ; Vol. 20, No. 68. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
荒年完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
豆浆烩面发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
科研通AI5应助carl采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
JDQW完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
烟花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
852应助Forest采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
4秒前
4秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
CYY发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
marktitov应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
4秒前
4秒前
爆米花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
打打应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
绿酒给绿酒的求助进行了留言
4秒前
在水一方应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
4秒前
所所应助霸气的南晴采纳,获得10
5秒前
香蕉觅云应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
顾矜应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
Aprilcc应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
乐乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
李云天完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
ISCN 2024 – An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2024) 3000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
105th Edition CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1600
Izeltabart tapatansine - AdisInsight 800
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3774819
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3320625
关于积分的说明 10201258
捐赠科研通 3035461
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1665536
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 796983
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 757677