医学
吉西他滨
内科学
培美曲塞
肿瘤科
肺癌
阶段(地层学)
放射治疗
癌
化疗
存活率
单变量分析
放化疗
多元分析
顺铂
生物
古生物学
作者
Yinyin Qin,Guoying Gao,Xiaohong Xie,Zheng Zhu,Weijun Guan,Xinqing Lin,Zhanhong Xie,Ming Ouyang,Rongchang Chen,Nanshan Zhong,Shiyue Li,Chengzhi Zhou
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2018.12.014
摘要
Pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PLELC) is a rare subtype of lung cancer that is less reported and not well-understood.We investigated the clinical features of 85 patients with PLELC to determine the prognostic factors.PLELC preferentially affected the young (71.8%) and nonsmokers (72.9%), without a significant difference in gender. Most (50.6%) patients were at the early stage with opportunity for operation, and patients at advanced stages mainly received multimodality treatment. The median follow-up duration was 17 months (range, 1-39 months) for the whole group, and the 3-year overall survival rate for patients in the early stage was 100%, whereas the 1-year and 2-year overall survival rate for patients in the advanced stage were 93% and 77%, respectively. The tumor stages (P = .031), distant lymph node metastasis (P = .035) and performance status (P = .008) were associated with progression-free survival in the univariate analysis, whereas performance status was an independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis (P = .016). The median progression-free survival in the paclitaxel plus platinum (12 months) group and gemcitabine plus platinum (10 months) group were significantly longer than that in the pemetrexed plus platinum (5 months) group (P = .001).PLELC had a better prognosis compared with other types of non-small-cell lung cancer and was sensitive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Gemcitabine plus platinum and paclitaxel plus platinum should be used as first-line treatment of PLELC, whereas the second-line treatment, if necessary, was always decided by the managing oncologist. The tumor stages and performance status were predictive in the prognosis of patients with PLELC.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI