眼科
有晶状体人工晶状体
人工晶状体
显著性差异
医学
瞳孔大小
光学
验光服务
眼病
物理
折射误差
小学生
内科学
作者
Giacomo Savini,Enrico Lupardi,Kenneth J. Hoffer,Jaime Aramberri,Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello
出处
期刊:Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2022-05-26
卷期号:48 (11): 1292-1296
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000976
摘要
Purpose: To compare phakic intraocular lens size calculations based on corneal diameter (CD) measurements by 3 instruments. Setting: G.B. Bietti Foundation I.R.C.C.S., Rome, Italy. Design: Retrospective interventional case series. Methods: Preoperatively, CD was measured with the Aladdin, IOLMaster 700, and Pentacam AXL Wave. The simulated ICL size was computed by entering CD measurements into the manufacturer's calculator. Postoperatively, vaulting was measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography. The optimal ICL size (OIS) was calculated and compared with the commercially available OIS (CAOIS). Results: 54 eyes (29 patients) with the implantable collamer lens (ICL) were enrolled. The mean CD was 12.02 ± 0.36 mm with the Aladdin, 12.35 ± 0.39 mm with the IOLMaster 700, and 12.22 ± 0.41 mm with the Pentacam AXL Wave ( P < .0001), with the closest agreement between the Pentacam AXL Wave and IOLMaster 700 (95% limits of agreement: −0.43 to +0.17 mm). Vaulting (mean: 558 ± 261 μm) was within 251 and 1000 μm in 49 eyes (83.3%). The mean difference between the simulated ICL size and OIS ranged between −0.11 ± 0.35 mm and 0.10 ± 0.30 mm ( P < .0001), with no statistically significant difference between the IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL Wave. The simulated ICL size was equal to CAOIS in 38 eyes (70.37%) with the Aladdin, 37 eyes (68.52%) with the IOLMaster 700, and 39 eyes (72.22%) with the Pentacam AXL Wave, without any statistically significant difference. Conclusions: CD measurements by the 3 devices lead to similar percentages of eyes with an ICL size equal to the OIS. Agreement is closer between the IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL Wave.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI